Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
North Carolina 6,10 70.7 (69.9, 71.4) 7,562 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 62.4 (62.3, 62.6) 214,614 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Camden County 6,10 41.1 (26.3, 61.9) 5 stable stable trend 8.5 (-26.4, 60.0)
Graham County 6,10 48.8 (33.5, 70.1) 7 stable stable trend 17.5 (-0.1, 38.3)
Polk County 6,10 50.3 (40.3, 62.8) 19 stable stable trend -3.2 (-35.6, 45.4)
Watauga County 6,10 51.4 (42.9, 61.4) 26 stable stable trend 2.7 (-19.9, 31.7)
Gates County 6,10 51.8 (37.1, 71.0) 8 stable stable trend -11.4 (-32.9, 17.0)
Chatham County 6,10 53.0 (46.6, 60.0) 52 stable stable trend 2.9 (-5.2, 11.7)
Transylvania County 6,10 53.6 (45.5, 63.1) 33 stable stable trend 11.1 (-5.6, 30.9)
Wake County 6,10 55.9 (53.4, 58.5) 406 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Madison County 6,10 56.5 (45.2, 70.2) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-29.9, 38.7)
Orange County 6,10 57.5 (51.3, 64.1) 69 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.8, 1.0)
Washington County 6,10 58.6 (44.1, 77.2) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-23.6, 31.3)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 59.4 (56.9, 61.9) 452 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.2, 1.6)
Henderson County 6,10 59.9 (54.9, 65.4) 109 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.4, 1.8)
Durham County 6,10 61.1 (56.7, 65.8) 147 stable stable trend -9.0 (-21.6, 5.6)
Duplin County 6,10 62.0 (54.1, 70.9) 45 stable stable trend 7.3 (-6.9, 23.7)
Alleghany County 6,10 62.4 (47.4, 81.9) 12 stable stable trend 10.7 (-20.4, 54.0)
Union County 6,10 62.9 (57.6, 68.5) 113 stable stable trend 0.6 (-12.9, 16.3)
Pitt County 6,10 62.9 (57.3, 69.0) 95 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.2, 3.9)
Bladen County 6,10 64.1 (54.0, 75.7) 30 stable stable trend -5.6 (-22.8, 15.5)
Jackson County 6,10 64.9 (55.2, 76.0) 33 stable stable trend -7.9 (-34.3, 29.1)
Avery County 6,10 65.5 (52.1, 81.9) 17 stable stable trend 3.8 (-15.2, 27.0)
Edgecombe County 6,10 65.8 (57.5, 75.1) 47 stable stable trend -1.5 (-15.2, 14.4)
Chowan County 6,10 66.1 (51.5, 84.2) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-18.6, 25.1)
New Hanover County 6,10 66.2 (61.6, 71.0) 158 stable stable trend -4.9 (-13.4, 4.3)
Buncombe County 6,10 66.2 (62.2, 70.5) 211 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.4, 2.1)
Dare County 6,10 66.3 (55.9, 78.2) 31 stable stable trend -7.7 (-19.9, 6.5)
Martin County 6,10 68.0 (56.2, 81.9) 24 stable stable trend -4.7 (-24.8, 20.8)
Hertford County 6,10 68.3 (56.1, 82.6) 22 stable stable trend -15.8 (-31.4, 3.3)
Catawba County 6,10 68.8 (63.4, 74.4) 126 stable stable trend 2.5 (-11.2, 18.2)
Pasquotank County 6,10 68.8 (58.4, 80.7) 32 stable stable trend -4.0 (-28.5, 29.0)
Halifax County 6,10 68.9 (60.6, 78.0) 51 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.9, 14.7)
Perquimans County 6,10 68.9 (53.9, 87.6) 15 stable stable trend -5.1 (-28.0, 25.1)
Robeson County 6,10 69.2 (63.0, 75.9) 95 stable stable trend 2.4 (-9.5, 15.8)
Clay County 6,10 69.3 (53.5, 89.8) 14 stable stable trend -14.3 (-43.7, 30.7)
Bertie County 6,10 69.7 (56.6, 85.3) 20 stable stable trend 4.1 (-17.2, 30.8)
Brunswick County 6,10 69.8 (64.1, 75.9) 127 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.5, 1.9)
Ashe County 6,10 70.1 (59.0, 82.9) 30 stable stable trend -2.9 (-21.8, 20.5)
Johnston County 6,10 70.1 (64.4, 76.3) 116 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Greene County 6,10 70.2 (55.8, 87.2) 17 stable stable trend -16.2 (-37.4, 12.1)
Haywood County 6,10 70.2 (62.7, 78.5) 67 stable stable trend 7.0 (-12.5, 31.0)
Guilford County 6,10 70.3 (67.0, 73.6) 367 stable stable trend -3.2 (-9.8, 3.9)
Caswell County 6,10 70.4 (57.7, 85.3) 22 rising rising trend 5.3 (3.0, 7.6)
Pender County 6,10 70.9 (62.1, 80.6) 49 stable stable trend -7.1 (-22.1, 10.8)
Forsyth County 6,10 70.9 (67.2, 74.8) 277 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.8, 3.1)
Vance County 6,10 71.0 (61.2, 82.0) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-20.2, 25.2)
Wilson County 6,10 71.2 (63.9, 79.2) 71 stable stable trend -5.4 (-17.9, 9.0)
Alamance County 6,10 71.3 (65.9, 77.0) 131 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.9, 6.3)
Montgomery County 6,10 71.3 (59.4, 85.1) 26 stable stable trend -2.5 (-19.7, 18.3)
Lincoln County 6,10 71.6 (63.9, 80.1) 65 stable stable trend 1.9 (-5.2, 9.4)
Cleveland County 6,10 72.3 (65.6, 79.4) 90 stable stable trend -3.5 (-10.1, 3.5)
Northampton County 6,10 72.4 (59.6, 87.4) 24 stable stable trend -5.9 (-26.8, 21.0)
Nash County 6,10 72.8 (65.9, 80.3) 85 stable stable trend -5.4 (-11.2, 0.8)
Lenoir County 6,10 73.0 (64.7, 82.2) 57 stable stable trend -8.9 (-27.7, 14.7)
Cumberland County 6,10 73.3 (68.8, 78.1) 202 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.8, 7.4)
Moore County 6,10 73.7 (67.4, 80.5) 108 stable stable trend 3.7 (-3.2, 11.0)
Iredell County 6,10 73.9 (68.2, 79.9) 131 stable stable trend -5.3 (-12.3, 2.2)
Macon County 6,10 75.4 (65.7, 86.4) 46 stable stable trend -3.4 (-12.5, 6.6)
Alexander County 6,10 75.7 (64.8, 88.1) 36 stable stable trend -6.5 (-22.5, 12.8)
Carteret County 6,10 76.1 (68.5, 84.5) 77 stable stable trend -7.4 (-18.2, 4.9)
Franklin County 6,10 76.3 (67.2, 86.3) 53 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.5, 5.5)
Lee County 6,10 76.6 (67.3, 86.8) 51 falling falling trend -10.4 (-15.2, -5.3)
Wayne County 6,10 76.6 (70.1, 83.5) 105 stable stable trend 3.0 (-8.1, 15.4)
Cabarrus County 6,10 76.9 (71.1, 83.0) 135 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.1, 1.8)
Wilkes County 6,10 77.2 (69.5, 85.7) 75 stable stable trend 2.5 (-10.8, 17.6)
Sampson County 6,10 77.7 (69.0, 87.2) 60 stable stable trend -4.0 (-14.7, 7.9)
Currituck County 6,10 78.6 (64.1, 95.4) 22 falling falling trend -12.6 (-16.4, -8.7)
Cherokee County 6,10 79.1 (68.0, 91.8) 39 stable stable trend 5.9 (-22.4, 44.6)
Rutherford County 6,10 79.4 (71.4, 88.0) 76 stable stable trend -2.1 (-10.5, 7.1)
Stanly County 6,10 80.4 (71.8, 90.0) 64 stable stable trend -4.1 (-22.9, 19.4)
Anson County 6,10 80.5 (67.1, 96.0) 26 stable stable trend 5.1 (-4.6, 15.7)
Craven County 6,10 81.0 (74.1, 88.5) 103 stable stable trend -1.1 (-17.1, 18.0)
Mitchell County 6,10 81.4 (66.2, 99.8) 20 stable stable trend -7.4 (-23.7, 12.4)
Davie County 6,10 81.6 (71.4, 93.1) 47 stable stable trend 1.7 (-9.6, 14.4)
Warren County 6,10 81.7 (67.8, 98.0) 26 stable stable trend -13.9 (-29.7, 5.3)
Yadkin County 6,10 82.2 (71.4, 94.4) 42 stable stable trend 7.0 (-11.4, 29.2)
Granville County 6,10 82.3 (72.8, 92.8) 56 stable stable trend -2.7 (-10.7, 5.9)
Columbus County 6,10 82.6 (73.4, 92.7) 61 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.1, 13.6)
Surry County 6,10 82.9 (75.1, 91.4) 83 stable stable trend -2.8 (-14.7, 10.7)
Caldwell County 6,10 82.9 (75.2, 91.2) 89 falling falling trend -6.3 (-10.4, -1.9)
Burke County 6,10 83.1 (75.8, 90.8) 100 stable stable trend 0.4 (-14.6, 18.0)
Pamlico County 6,10 83.3 (66.8, 103.6) 19 stable stable trend 11.3 (-16.0, 47.4)
Beaufort County 6,10 83.5 (73.9, 94.2) 58 stable stable trend -3.2 (-10.3, 4.6)
Hyde County 6,10 83.6 (56.4, 120.5) 6 stable stable trend -7.7 (-36.4, 34.0)
Davidson County 6,10 83.9 (78.3, 89.9) 170 stable stable trend -4.3 (-10.7, 2.5)
Scotland County 6,10 84.5 (72.4, 98.1) 36 stable stable trend 3.5 (-13.9, 24.4)
Person County 6,10 84.6 (73.4, 97.2) 42 stable stable trend 1.5 (-8.4, 12.4)
Onslow County 6,10 85.5 (78.1, 93.4) 101 stable stable trend 0.0 (-13.5, 15.7)
Richmond County 6,10 85.7 (75.2, 97.4) 49 stable stable trend -3.6 (-18.1, 13.5)
Rowan County 6,10 85.9 (79.7, 92.6) 144 stable stable trend 0.8 (-7.0, 9.1)
Harnett County 6,10 86.3 (78.5, 94.6) 93 stable stable trend -0.3 (-9.8, 10.3)
Yancey County 6,10 86.3 (71.5, 103.9) 25 stable stable trend 16.6 (-29.0, 91.4)
Jones County 6,10 86.4 (66.8, 110.9) 13 stable stable trend -12.9 (-27.1, 4.1)
Randolph County 6,10 86.5 (80.3, 93.1) 147 stable stable trend -5.3 (-12.7, 2.8)
Gaston County 6,10 87.2 (82.0, 92.8) 211 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.7, 8.5)
McDowell County 6,10 88.6 (78.2, 100.2) 54 stable stable trend 1.4 (-10.1, 14.3)
Rockingham County 6,10 89.9 (82.6, 97.8) 113 stable stable trend -0.7 (-11.7, 11.7)
Stokes County 6,10 90.6 (80.4, 101.9) 58 stable stable trend 0.4 (-8.0, 9.6)
Swain County 6,10 95.5 (76.7, 118.0) 18 stable stable trend -13.0 (-27.4, 4.4)
Hoke County 6,10 96.9 (82.2, 113.3) 34 stable stable trend -2.7 (-27.3, 30.3)
Tyrrell County 6,10 97.5 (64.7, 143.1) 6 stable stable trend -6.7 (-46.0, 61.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2016 9:36 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top