Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Cervix, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
North Carolina 6,10 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) 360 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.6, 7.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 7.6 (7.5, 7.7) 12,404 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)
Sampson County 6,10 16.4 (10.7, 24.1) 5 stable stable trend 5.3 (-49.9, 121.3)
Lenoir County 6,10 13.9 (8.3, 21.6) 4 stable stable trend 24.7 (-29.5, 120.4)
Richmond County 6,10 13.7 (7.9, 22.3) 3
*
*
Vance County 6,10 11.7 (6.6, 19.4) 3
*
*
Harnett County 6,10 11.3 (7.7, 15.9) 6 stable stable trend -5.6 (-22.4, 14.8)
Cleveland County 6,10 10.1 (6.4, 15.0) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-40.7, 71.3)
Rowan County 6,10 9.9 (6.9, 13.7) 7 stable stable trend 15.7 (-24.9, 78.2)
Haywood County 6,10 9.9 (5.4, 16.5) 3
*
*
Duplin County 6,10 9.6 (5.4, 15.8) 3
*
*
Gaston County 6,10 9.1 (6.8, 12.0) 10 stable stable trend -4.7 (-31.2, 32.1)
Johnston County 6,10 9.0 (6.4, 12.3) 8 stable stable trend 8.5 (-48.1, 126.7)
Caldwell County 6,10 8.4 (4.8, 13.6) 3
*
*
Brunswick County 6,10 8.3 (5.0, 12.9) 4 stable stable trend 7.2 (-28.9, 61.7)
Burke County 6,10 8.3 (4.9, 13.0) 4 stable stable trend 5.3 (-56.0, 151.9)
Wilson County 6,10 8.2 (4.8, 13.1) 4 stable stable trend 29.9 (-29.4, 138.9)
Moore County 6,10 8.1 (4.7, 12.9) 4 stable stable trend -10.5 (-46.6, 50.0)
Surry County 6,10 8.0 (4.6, 13.2) 3
*
*
Cumberland County 6,10 8.0 (6.2, 10.2) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-13.1, 13.3)
Lincoln County 6,10 7.7 (4.4, 12.4) 3
*
*
Buncombe County 6,10 7.6 (5.7, 10.1) 11 stable stable trend -19.1 (-46.7, 22.9)
Randolph County 6,10 7.3 (4.8, 10.7) 5 stable stable trend 7.1 (-3.6, 19.0)
Wayne County 6,10 7.3 (4.6, 10.9) 5 stable stable trend -16.8 (-46.4, 29.3)
Durham County 6,10 7.0 (5.1, 9.3) 10 stable stable trend -10.0 (-43.2, 42.5)
Union County 6,10 6.9 (4.8, 9.6) 7 stable stable trend -24.9 (-66.1, 66.7)
Craven County 6,10 6.8 (3.8, 11.2) 3
*
*
Alamance County 6,10 6.8 (4.4, 9.9) 5 stable stable trend 12.8 (-25.6, 70.9)
Onslow County 6,10 6.8 (4.3, 10.1) 5 stable stable trend -5.0 (-40.2, 50.8)
Orange County 6,10 6.7 (4.1, 10.2) 4 stable stable trend 28.1 (-17.4, 98.6)
Cabarrus County 6,10 6.3 (4.2, 9.1) 6 rising rising trend 33.2 (0.2, 77.0)
Mecklenburg County 6,10 6.2 (5.3, 7.3) 31 stable stable trend -10.6 (-35.9, 24.8)
Wake County 6,10 6.0 (5.0, 7.1) 29 stable stable trend 9.2 (-25.8, 60.9)
Guilford County 6,10 5.9 (4.7, 7.4) 16 stable stable trend 10.6 (-18.2, 49.6)
New Hanover County 6,10 5.9 (4.0, 8.4) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-51.6, 97.7)
Rockingham County 6,10 5.8 (3.3, 9.6) 3
*
*
Pitt County 6,10 5.8 (3.7, 8.7) 5 stable stable trend 10.6 (-7.7, 32.7)
Robeson County 6,10 5.8 (3.5, 9.0) 4 rising rising trend 17.4 (7.7, 28.0)
Iredell County 6,10 5.8 (3.7, 8.6) 5 rising rising trend 19.8 (7.0, 34.2)
Forsyth County 6,10 5.7 (4.3, 7.4) 11 stable stable trend 7.9 (-2.0, 18.7)
Catawba County 6,10 5.7 (3.6, 8.5) 5 stable stable trend 10.7 (-48.2, 136.6)
Nash County 6,10 5.5 (3.1, 9.1) 3
*
*
Davidson County 6,10 5.5 (3.4, 8.2) 5 stable stable trend 5.2 (-25.7, 48.9)
Henderson County 6,10 5.4 (3.0, 9.1) 4 stable stable trend 5.7 (-20.0, 39.6)
Alexander County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alleghany County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Anson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ashe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaufort County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bertie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bladen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carteret County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caswell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chatham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chowan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbus County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Currituck County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dare County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edgecombe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gates County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Graham County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granville County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Halifax County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hertford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hoke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Macon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Northampton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pamlico County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pasquotank County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pender County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perquimans County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Person County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rutherford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanly County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stokes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swain County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Transylvania County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyrrell County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watauga County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yadkin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yancey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/29/2016 3:53 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top