Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota 6 226.1 (221.0, 231.3) N/A 1,637 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 225.0 (224.8, 225.3) N/A 726,500 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
Barnes County 6 227.7 (186.0, 276.5) 20 (2, 40) 25 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.1)
Benson County 6 244.9 (187.9, 313.4) 10 (1, 41) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.6)
Bottineau County 6 263.2 (204.9, 333.5) 6 (1, 38) 17 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.6)
Bowman County 6 223.5 (149.9, 322.1) 24 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.2, 5.2)
Burke County 6 134.7 (73.8, 230.3) 44 (9, 47) 3 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.7, 1.7)
Burleigh County 6 234.3 (220.1, 249.3) 15 (7, 29) 220 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.5)
Cass County 6 241.0 (230.0, 252.5) 11 (6, 25) 380 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Cavalier County 6 207.4 (141.7, 294.9) 32 (1, 46) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.4)
Dickey County 6 161.4 (112.2, 225.9) 41 (11, 47) 8 stable stable trend -3.2 (-10.3, 3.2)
Divide County 6 146.2 (87.3, 237.8) 43 (8, 47) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-8.4, 7.4)
Dunn County 6 101.9 (64.8, 154.5) 47 (38, 47) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.9, 0.5)
Eddy County 6 216.7 (134.2, 334.1) 27 (1, 46) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-7.8, 6.2)
Emmons County 6 254.7 (179.7, 354.4) 7 (1, 43) 10 rising rising trend 5.0 (0.1, 11.0)
Foster County 6 220.4 (148.3, 316.9) 25 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -7.9 (-32.6, 0.9)
Golden Valley County 6 225.0 (126.5, 371.4) 22 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.4, 7.2)
Grand Forks County 6 231.8 (213.6, 251.0) 16 (6, 31) 135 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Grant County 6 207.8 (128.8, 322.9) 31 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Griggs County 6 224.7 (140.4, 346.6) 23 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Hettinger County 6 231.2 (152.2, 339.8) 17 (1, 46) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.3, 7.4)
Kidder County 6 173.6 (102.4, 278.1) 40 (2, 47) 4
*
*
LaMoure County 6 200.0 (139.0, 280.8) 35 (2, 46) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.7)
McHenry County 6 207.4 (156.4, 270.6) 33 (2, 44) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 3.0)
McIntosh County 6 228.7 (149.8, 340.7) 19 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.5)
McKenzie County 6 152.6 (122.6, 187.7) 42 (29, 47) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 3.6)
McLean County 6 290.5 (241.4, 347.4) 1 (1, 27) 30 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Mercer County 6 274.4 (223.4, 334.0) 3 (1, 32) 25 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.0, 5.9)
Morton County 6 239.6 (214.8, 266.7) 12 (3, 31) 75 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.5)
Mountrail County 6 249.5 (205.8, 299.7) 8 (1, 36) 25 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.7)
Nelson County 6 211.3 (143.4, 305.8) 29 (1, 46) 8
*
*
Pembina County 6 230.1 (180.3, 290.7) 18 (1, 42) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.4)
Pierce County 6 263.4 (193.0, 352.4) 5 (1, 41) 11 rising rising trend 9.9 (1.1, 37.8)
Ramsey County 6 225.6 (186.5, 270.8) 21 (3, 40) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 1.9)
Ransom County 6 181.9 (134.2, 242.9) 37 (7, 46) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.7, 0.9)
Renville County 6 283.9 (192.2, 406.8) 2 (1, 42) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 6.7)
Richland County 6 219.4 (185.8, 257.5) 26 (4, 40) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Rolette County 6 249.4 (211.5, 292.2) 9 (1, 35) 34 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.1)
Sargent County 6 266.9 (195.6, 357.2) 4 (1, 40) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.6)
Sioux County 6 133.0 (86.3, 195.9) 45 (23, 47) 5 falling falling trend -8.2 (-20.4, -3.6)
Stark County 6 211.2 (187.1, 237.6) 30 (10, 39) 61 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.8)
Steele County 6 174.9 (96.3, 296.3) 39 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.0, 9.9)
Stutsman County 6 201.9 (174.6, 232.5) 34 (11, 41) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Towner County 6 131.3 (75.2, 222.8) 46 (13, 47) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-8.0, 1.3)
Traill County 6 239.3 (192.0, 295.4) 13 (1, 39) 21 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.2, 5.7)
Walsh County 6 181.3 (145.8, 223.4) 38 (14, 45) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.1)
Ward County 6 236.2 (218.5, 254.9) 14 (6, 30) 142 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 0.5)
Wells County 6 212.8 (149.1, 297.2) 28 (1, 45) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 5.1)
Williams County 6 198.9 (177.2, 222.6) 36 (17, 40) 64 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.6)
Adams County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/19/2024 5:20 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top