Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Dakota by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota 6 122.0 (117.4, 126.8) N/A 556 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.2, 7.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Mercer County 6 215.7 (167.2, 275.9) 1 (1, 12) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 5.1)
Eddy County 6 190.6 (110.6, 319.0) 2 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Hettinger County 6 186.1 (114.7, 299.7) 3 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.6, 8.4)
Grant County 6 175.3 (109.6, 287.4) 4 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Wells County 6 172.0 (116.4, 253.8) 5 (1, 32) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.8, 3.1)
Dunn County 6 164.5 (103.0, 251.4) 6 (1, 34) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.6, 6.3)
McLean County 6 151.7 (117.2, 196.0) 7 (2, 28) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.5)
McIntosh County 6 146.4 (82.0, 256.9) 8 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.3, 6.7)
Burleigh County 6 146.0 (131.8, 161.4) 9 (4, 21) 81 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.1)
Ward County 6 145.0 (127.3, 164.6) 10 (4, 23) 50 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.2, 0.0)
Kidder County 6 144.2 (83.3, 246.5) 11 (1, 37) 3
*
*
Emmons County 6 143.1 (89.2, 229.9) 12 (1, 36) 5
*
*
Morton County 6 142.2 (118.6, 169.3) 13 (3, 26) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.7)
Foster County 6 140.9 (84.1, 230.2) 14 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-9.2, 3.4)
Stark County 6 135.1 (110.5, 163.6) 15 (4, 29) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.2)
Ramsey County 6 135.0 (102.5, 176.0) 16 (3, 32) 12 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.3, -1.2)
Bottineau County 6 134.3 (93.4, 190.9) 17 (2, 35) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.9, -0.3)
Traill County 6 133.3 (95.4, 183.6) 18 (2, 34) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.2, -0.6)
Walsh County 6 130.8 (99.0, 171.6) 19 (3, 33) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.8, 4.6)
Pembina County 6 130.1 (92.5, 181.7) 20 (3, 35) 8
*
*
Mountrail County 6 125.2 (86.3, 175.9) 21 (3, 36) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.8, 1.8)
Ransom County 6 120.9 (77.9, 183.2) 22 (2, 37) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 1.9)
Cass County 6 114.2 (104.1, 125.1) 23 (15, 30) 100 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.8, -2.4)
Nelson County 6 113.8 (66.0, 198.9) 24 (2, 37) 3
*
*
Richland County 6 108.2 (82.1, 140.9) 25 (8, 36) 12 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.6)
McHenry County 6 104.5 (67.4, 158.7) 26 (5, 37) 5 stable stable trend -4.3 (-12.1, 2.3)
Pierce County 6 102.3 (61.3, 168.1) 27 (5, 37) 4
*
*
Grand Forks County 6 100.3 (85.6, 116.8) 28 (18, 35) 35 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.6, -2.0)
Sargent County 6 96.1 (54.6, 163.5) 29 (5, 37) 3 falling falling trend -11.4 (-26.8, -7.0)
LaMoure County 6 94.2 (57.3, 156.0) 30 (7, 37) 4 stable stable trend -5.5 (-12.8, 0.7)
Benson County 6 93.1 (55.2, 148.6) 31 (6, 37) 4
*
*
Cavalier County 6 90.9 (51.6, 158.0) 32 (6, 37) 3
*
*
Williams County 6 89.7 (69.0, 114.4) 33 (19, 37) 15 rising rising trend 14.4 (0.5, 26.7)
Stutsman County 6 89.7 (68.3, 116.1) 34 (18, 37) 13 falling falling trend -11.8 (-25.9, -6.3)
Rolette County 6 78.7 (51.7, 115.2) 35 (18, 37) 6 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.3, -2.2)
Barnes County 6 75.1 (51.3, 108.6) 36 (21, 37) 7 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.1, -2.6)
McKenzie County 6 64.4 (36.7, 103.6) 37 (21, 37) 4 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.6, -0.8)
Adams County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickey County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Divide County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Griggs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towner County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 6:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adams, Billings, Bowman, Burke, Dickey, Divide, Golden Valley, Griggs, Logan, Oliver, Renville, Sheridan, Sioux, Slope, Steele, Towner

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top