Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 *** 104.2 (103.2, 105.3) N/A 7,402 stable stable trend 0.6 (-4.9, 6.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 104.5 (104.3, 104.7) N/A 192,918 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.5, 5.0)
Delaware County 6 *** 132.9 (122.7, 143.7) 1 (1, 14) 137 stable stable trend 5.3 (-1.7, 12.8)
Van Wert County 6 *** 131.7 (108.9, 158.3) 2 (1, 44) 24 stable stable trend 17.2 (-13.0, 58.0)
Medina County 6 *** 131.5 (122.0, 141.6) 3 (1, 14) 150 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Mercer County 6 *** 128.0 (109.0, 149.6) 4 (1, 43) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Putnam County 6 *** 126.1 (105.4, 150.0) 5 (1, 50) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Cuyahoga County 6 *** 124.4 (120.8, 128.0) 6 (2, 13) 959 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.4)
Franklin County 6 *** 123.3 (119.1, 127.7) 7 (2, 14) 704 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.5)
Allen County 6 *** 122.9 (110.8, 135.9) 8 (1, 30) 80 stable stable trend 11.8 (0.0, 25.0)
Auglaize County 6 *** 115.2 (98.4, 134.2) 9 (1, 58) 35 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.8)
Morrow County 6 *** 115.2 (95.9, 137.6) 10 (1, 65) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.7)
Lucas County 6 *** 114.8 (108.8, 121.1) 11 (5, 27) 294 stable stable trend 0.9 (-7.9, 10.5)
Lorain County 6 *** 114.6 (107.9, 121.7) 12 (4, 28) 227 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.8)
Monroe County 6 *** 114.2 (87.8, 147.5) 13 (1, 83) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.3)
Hamilton County 6 *** 113.8 (109.3, 118.5) 14 (7, 26) 509 stable stable trend 1.9 (-5.1, 9.5)
Fulton County 6 *** 112.7 (95.0, 133.0) 15 (1, 63) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.3)
Knox County 6 *** 112.5 (97.9, 128.8) 16 (1, 61) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.5)
Fairfield County 6 *** 112.2 (102.4, 122.7) 17 (3, 42) 102 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
Defiance County 6 *** 111.8 (93.5, 133.0) 18 (1, 67) 28 stable stable trend 1.7 (-14.4, 20.9)
Tuscarawas County 6 *** 111.3 (99.8, 124.0) 19 (3, 52) 70 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Stark County 6 *** 108.7 (102.9, 114.8) 20 (9, 38) 270 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Gallia County 6 *** 108.2 (88.6, 131.1) 21 (1, 79) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.7)
Ottawa County 6 *** 107.5 (92.6, 124.8) 22 (2, 67) 39 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.4)
Clinton County 6 *** 105.3 (87.5, 125.8) 23 (2, 76) 26 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.4)
Harrison County 6 *** 105.2 (80.6, 136.5) 24 (1, 86) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.4)
Union County 6 *** 102.3 (85.6, 121.3) 25 (2, 79) 29 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.0)
Licking County 6 *** 102.1 (93.5, 111.3) 26 (11, 58) 109 stable stable trend 6.4 (-8.8, 24.2)
Portage County 6 *** 102.0 (93.1, 111.6) 27 (10, 62) 101 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Highland County 6 *** 101.4 (84.6, 120.6) 28 (2, 81) 27 rising rising trend 15.3 (0.9, 31.9)
Richland County 6 *** 101.4 (91.7, 111.9) 29 (10, 62) 83 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.8)
Wood County 6 *** 101.3 (90.9, 112.7) 30 (9, 66) 73 falling falling trend -9.2 (-15.8, -2.1)
Wayne County 6 *** 100.8 (90.6, 111.8) 31 (11, 65) 74 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Warren County 6 *** 100.5 (92.5, 109.0) 32 (13, 60) 125 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.8, -2.7)
Jackson County 6 *** 100.3 (81.1, 123.1) 33 (2, 85) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
Summit County 6 *** 99.6 (94.9, 104.6) 34 (20, 53) 346 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.9)
Trumbull County 6 *** 99.2 (91.9, 107.0) 35 (17, 60) 144 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.8, -3.1)
Mahoning County 6 *** 99.2 (92.3, 106.5) 36 (17, 59) 162 falling falling trend -5.7 (-7.0, -4.3)
Montgomery County 6 *** 98.1 (93.3, 103.2) 37 (22, 56) 320 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.3, 0.3)
Ashland County 6 *** 97.3 (83.2, 113.2) 38 (8, 80) 35 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Geauga County 6 *** 96.8 (86.6, 108.1) 39 (14, 74) 69 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.2, -3.0)
Carroll County 6 *** 96.8 (79.0, 118.2) 40 (3, 85) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -0.3)
Muskingum County 6 *** 96.8 (85.3, 109.5) 41 (11, 75) 53 rising rising trend 24.2 (7.9, 42.9)
Paulding County 6 *** 96.3 (73.6, 124.5) 42 (1, 87) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.8, 2.4)
Sandusky County 6 *** 96.0 (82.7, 111.0) 43 (10, 80) 39 stable stable trend 10.8 (-2.3, 25.7)
Huron County 6 *** 95.9 (81.7, 111.9) 44 (8, 81) 35 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.7)
Logan County 6 *** 95.7 (80.4, 113.4) 45 (7, 83) 29 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.1)
Champaign County 6 *** 95.7 (78.9, 115.3) 46 (5, 85) 24 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.7)
Henry County 6 *** 92.8 (73.5, 116.1) 47 (5, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.3)
Erie County 6 *** 92.7 (81.9, 104.9) 48 (14, 79) 54 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -1.7)
Hancock County 6 *** 92.7 (80.4, 106.4) 49 (16, 81) 43 falling falling trend -8.6 (-12.2, -4.8)
Hardin County 6 *** 92.6 (73.5, 115.5) 50 (4, 87) 17 stable stable trend 13.0 (-18.0, 55.8)
Madison County 6 *** 92.6 (76.2, 111.6) 51 (8, 86) 24 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.7, -0.2)
Scioto County 6 *** 92.5 (80.6, 105.8) 52 (16, 81) 45 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.5, -3.7)
Belmont County 6 *** 92.0 (80.3, 105.3) 53 (15, 82) 46 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.0, -1.8)
Meigs County 6 *** 91.7 (71.8, 116.2) 54 (4, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.1)
Athens County 6 *** 91.6 (76.8, 108.7) 55 (11, 86) 29 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.8, -2.2)
Lake County 6 *** 90.0 (83.3, 97.1) 56 (30, 74) 142 falling falling trend -6.1 (-7.9, -4.1)
Butler County 6 *** 89.9 (83.9, 96.1) 57 (33, 73) 183 falling falling trend -7.0 (-9.8, -4.0)
Greene County 6 *** 88.8 (80.6, 97.6) 58 (27, 79) 91 falling falling trend -7.2 (-9.7, -4.6)
Ross County 6 *** 88.5 (76.6, 101.8) 59 (20, 85) 42 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 1.0)
Jefferson County 6 *** 88.4 (76.9, 101.4) 60 (22, 84) 45 stable stable trend 4.3 (-15.0, 28.2)
Vinton County 6 *** 88.1 (61.4, 123.5) 61 (1, 88) 8 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.8, -0.2)
Guernsey County 6 *** 87.1 (71.9, 105.0) 62 (15, 87) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.7)
Preble County 6 *** 86.2 (71.2, 103.8) 63 (15, 87) 24 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.7)
Columbiana County 6 *** 83.5 (74.4, 93.6) 64 (36, 85) 64 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.0, -4.1)
Adams County 6 *** 83.5 (65.2, 105.8) 65 (11, 87) 15 stable stable trend 9.1 (-11.2, 33.9)
Brown County 6 *** 83.5 (69.1, 100.3) 66 (19, 87) 24 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.7, -1.9)
Lawrence County 6 *** 82.1 (69.9, 96.1) 67 (25, 87) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.2)
Pickaway County 6 *** 82.0 (68.6, 97.2) 68 (24, 87) 28 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.1)
Miami County 6 *** 81.8 (72.4, 92.2) 69 (36, 86) 57 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.3, -3.1)
Fayette County 6 *** 81.3 (63.4, 103.1) 70 (14, 87) 15 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.0, -0.9)
Pike County 6 *** 80.7 (63.2, 101.9) 71 (14, 87) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.3)
Clermont County 6 *** 80.1 (73.0, 87.8) 72 (48, 85) 100 falling falling trend -9.0 (-11.7, -6.2)
Washington County 6 *** 79.5 (68.0, 92.8) 73 (34, 87) 35 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.4, -3.8)
Coshocton County 6 *** 78.8 (64.1, 96.3) 74 (25, 87) 21 rising rising trend 18.7 (5.3, 33.9)
Holmes County 6 *** 78.6 (62.3, 97.7) 75 (19, 87) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.2)
Seneca County 6 *** 77.5 (64.9, 92.1) 76 (30, 87) 28 falling falling trend -8.7 (-12.6, -4.7)
Shelby County 6 *** 76.8 (63.1, 92.8) 77 (27, 87) 23 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.8, -2.2)
Crawford County 6 *** 76.6 (63.2, 92.4) 78 (33, 87) 23 falling falling trend -7.4 (-11.1, -3.6)
Ashtabula County 6 *** 76.5 (67.3, 86.7) 79 (50, 87) 52 falling falling trend -7.1 (-9.4, -4.7)
Wyandot County 6 *** 75.8 (57.4, 98.9) 80 (18, 88) 12 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.4, -1.9)
Williams County 6 *** 75.2 (60.4, 93.0) 81 (32, 88) 18 stable stable trend 9.0 (-9.2, 30.9)
Marion County 6 *** 74.9 (63.5, 87.9) 82 (46, 87) 33 stable stable trend 9.0 (-9.8, 31.9)
Perry County 6 *** 73.7 (58.6, 91.8) 83 (30, 88) 18 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.2, 1.5)
Clark County 6 *** 73.6 (65.8, 82.2) 84 (59, 87) 67 falling falling trend -8.4 (-12.5, -4.1)
Morgan County 6 *** 71.6 (51.2, 98.9) 85 (19, 88) 8 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.5, -1.2)
Hocking County 6 *** 71.1 (55.5, 90.3) 86 (32, 88) 15 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.2, -2.3)
Darke County 6 *** 70.5 (58.6, 84.3) 87 (52, 88) 25 falling falling trend -6.7 (-9.2, -4.2)
Noble County 6 *** 42.1 (28.4, 62.9) 88 (82, 88) 7 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.6, -2.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2021 7:12 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top