Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 18.0 (17.7, 18.4) N/A 2,648 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Williams County 6 Rural 11.8 (7.8, 17.2) 87 (38, 87) 6 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.6, 1.0)
Geauga County 6 Urban 13.2 (10.5, 16.4) 86 (48, 87) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.2)
Holmes County 6 Rural 14.0 (9.4, 20.1) 85 (17, 87) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.5)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 14.3 (12.3, 16.5) 84 (51, 87) 41 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Knox County 6 Rural 14.4 (10.9, 18.9) 83 (25, 87) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 4.6)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 14.7 (11.9, 18.0) 82 (37, 87) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-10.2, -0.1)
Belmont County 6 Urban 15.1 (11.7, 19.2) 81 (26, 87) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.3)
Wayne County 6 Rural 15.3 (12.4, 18.7) 80 (28, 87) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.2)
Fayette County 6 Rural 15.5 (10.0, 22.9) 79 (6, 87) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.9)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 15.5 (12.7, 18.8) 78 (30, 87) 24 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.4)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 15.6 (12.5, 19.3) 77 (26, 87) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.5)
Erie County 6 Urban 15.7 (12.3, 19.8) 76 (24, 87) 18 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.4, 5.1)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 15.8 (11.4, 21.6) 75 (14, 87) 10 stable stable trend 19.3 (-2.5, 35.9)
Greene County 6 Urban 15.9 (13.5, 18.6) 74 (34, 87) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Delaware County 6 Urban 15.9 (13.6, 18.4) 73 (36, 86) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.5)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 16.1 (15.2, 17.0) 72 (52, 80) 261 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.8)
Summit County 6 Urban 16.1 (14.8, 17.6) 71 (44, 83) 113 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 16.2 (14.1, 18.5) 70 (35, 85) 50 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.3)
Stark County 6 Urban 16.3 (14.7, 18.1) 69 (42, 84) 82 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 16.5 (11.0, 23.9) 68 (7, 87) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.7, 7.5)
Licking County 6 Urban 16.6 (14.2, 19.4) 67 (27, 85) 36 stable stable trend -2.1 (-12.7, 0.3)
Lake County 6 Urban 16.7 (14.7, 19.0) 66 (29, 84) 54 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.6)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 17.0 (12.0, 23.6) 65 (6, 87) 8 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.6, 6.4)
Franklin County 6 Urban 17.1 (16.1, 18.2) 64 (40, 75) 224 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.5)
Ashland County 6 Rural 17.3 (12.8, 23.0) 63 (9, 87) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.1, 6.8)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 17.4 (13.3, 22.4) 62 (10, 87) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.4)
Union County 6 Urban 17.5 (13.2, 22.7) 61 (11, 87) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 4.3)
Carroll County 6 Urban 17.5 (11.8, 25.3) 60 (4, 87) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 5.3)
Fulton County 6 Urban 17.5 (12.7, 23.6) 59 (7, 87) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.3, 6.1)
Warren County 6 Urban 17.6 (15.4, 20.0) 58 (24, 82) 49 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.5)
Wood County 6 Urban 17.6 (14.6, 21.1) 57 (16, 85) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Medina County 6 Urban 17.7 (15.3, 20.3) 56 (20, 82) 44 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.0, 3.6)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 17.7 (15.1, 20.7) 55 (20, 84) 35 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.3, 0.8)
Darke County 6 Rural 17.8 (13.5, 23.1) 54 (8, 87) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.6)
Paulding County 6 Rural 17.8 (11.4, 27.0) 53 (2, 87) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.1, 6.4)
Portage County 6 Urban 17.9 (15.3, 21.0) 52 (18, 82) 36 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 4.0)
Logan County 6 Rural 18.1 (13.5, 23.8) 51 (6, 87) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.4)
Preble County 6 Rural 18.2 (13.4, 24.4) 50 (5, 87) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.1, 5.2)
Hancock County 6 Rural 18.2 (14.4, 22.8) 49 (9, 86) 17 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 4.9)
Perry County 6 Urban 18.3 (13.0, 25.3) 48 (4, 87) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-18.3, 0.8)
Henry County 6 Rural 18.6 (12.6, 26.5) 47 (2, 87) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 6.1)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 18.6 (17.4, 20.0) 46 (27, 64) 179 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 1.9)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 18.8 (12.6, 27.3) 45 (2, 87) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.3, 1.1)
Allen County 6 Urban 19.2 (15.8, 23.1) 44 (9, 83) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.6)
Marion County 6 Rural 19.2 (15.1, 24.0) 43 (6, 85) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.4)
Vinton County 6 Rural 19.3 (10.9, 32.2) 42 (1, 87) 3
*
*
Lorain County 6 Urban 19.3 (17.4, 21.4) 41 (18, 67) 79 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.2)
Seneca County 6 Rural 19.4 (14.7, 25.1) 40 (4, 86) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.2)
Richland County 6 Urban 19.5 (16.4, 22.9) 39 (10, 78) 32 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.1, 5.6)
Lucas County 6 Urban 19.6 (17.9, 21.5) 38 (18, 63) 104 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.8, 3.8)
Morrow County 6 Urban 19.7 (14.3, 26.8) 37 (2, 87) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 7.1)
Madison County 6 Urban 19.8 (14.8, 26.0) 36 (4, 86) 11 stable stable trend -12.7 (-27.9, 2.4)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 20.0 (18.4, 21.6) 35 (17, 57) 134 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.0, 3.2)
Clinton County 6 Rural 20.1 (14.9, 26.6) 34 (3, 86) 11
*
*
Clermont County 6 Urban 20.2 (17.8, 22.9) 33 (10, 66) 53 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.6)
Putnam County 6 Rural 20.4 (14.7, 27.7) 32 (2, 87) 9
*
*
Adams County 6 Rural 20.5 (14.1, 28.9) 31 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.2, 9.0)
Clark County 6 Urban 20.5 (17.4, 24.0) 30 (7, 74) 36 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 20.7 (15.6, 27.1) 29 (2, 85) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.4, 6.0)
Gallia County 6 Rural 20.9 (14.5, 29.2) 28 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.4, 9.8)
Butler County 6 Urban 21.0 (19.1, 23.1) 27 (11, 54) 94 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.5)
Mercer County 6 Rural 21.1 (15.6, 28.0) 26 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.8, 6.5)
Monroe County 6 Rural 21.1 (12.2, 34.5) 25 (1, 87) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.5, 9.8)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 21.2 (16.3, 27.3) 24 (2, 83) 14 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.1, 14.0)
Miami County 6 Urban 21.6 (18.1, 25.5) 23 (5, 72) 30 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.4, 5.4)
Defiance County 6 Rural 21.6 (15.8, 28.8) 22 (1, 84) 10 stable stable trend 3.4 (0.0, 7.3)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 21.8 (16.0, 29.0) 21 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.9, 6.7)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 21.8 (17.8, 26.4) 20 (3, 74) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.4)
Huron County 6 Rural 22.1 (17.3, 27.9) 19 (2, 81) 16 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.2, 7.9)
Morgan County 6 Rural 22.2 (13.3, 35.4) 18 (1, 87) 4
*
*
Champaign County 6 Rural 22.5 (16.8, 29.6) 17 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.4)
Hocking County 6 Urban 22.5 (16.0, 30.9) 16 (1, 85) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.3, 9.2)
Athens County 6 Rural 22.8 (17.7, 29.1) 15 (1, 80) 14 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 8.0)
Shelby County 6 Rural 23.2 (17.9, 29.7) 14 (1, 77) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.3, 5.9)
Ross County 6 Rural 23.3 (19.1, 28.2) 13 (2, 63) 23 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.0)
Highland County 6 Rural 23.3 (17.8, 30.1) 12 (1, 78) 13 stable stable trend -15.9 (-37.1, 5.4)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 23.7 (18.9, 29.4) 11 (1, 69) 18 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.5)
Scioto County 6 Rural 24.6 (20.1, 29.8) 10 (1, 53) 23 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 5.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 24.6 (19.6, 30.6) 9 (1, 63) 19 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.7, 5.0)
Pike County 6 Rural 24.7 (17.6, 33.7) 8 (1, 82) 9 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.1, 6.9)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 25.3 (20.3, 31.2) 7 (1, 58) 20 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 4.9)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 26.4 (21.5, 32.2) 6 (1, 46) 24 falling falling trend -18.3 (-33.2, -4.8)
Meigs County 6 Rural 27.4 (19.7, 37.6) 5 (1, 72) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.3, 7.4)
Brown County 6 Urban 28.0 (21.9, 35.3) 4 (1, 55) 16 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.7, 7.2)
Jackson County 6 Rural 28.7 (21.3, 37.9) 3 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.7, 7.4)
Harrison County 6 Rural 29.6 (19.1, 44.2) 2 (1, 83) 6
*
*
Hardin County 6 Rural 31.2 (23.1, 41.1) 1 (1, 50) 11 rising rising trend 7.0 (3.2, 12.6)
Noble County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/13/2024 7:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top