Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 *** 242.9 (241.6, 244.1) N/A 29,925 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 227.6 (227.4, 227.9) N/A 750,329 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Pike County 6 *** 307.4 (278.6, 338.5) 1 (1, 20) 91 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.0, 3.3)
Vinton County 6 *** 306.7 (264.7, 353.9) 2 (1, 59) 43 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.5)
Lawrence County 6 *** 303.1 (283.5, 323.7) 3 (1, 11) 195 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.0, 10.3)
Hardin County 6 *** 281.2 (253.7, 311.0) 4 (1, 58) 84 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 2.9)
Jefferson County 6 *** 278.7 (260.4, 298.0) 5 (1, 34) 205 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.8)
Scioto County 6 *** 275.7 (259.0, 293.3) 6 (1, 37) 220 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Adams County 6 *** 273.4 (246.3, 302.9) 7 (1, 64) 82 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.5)
Ottawa County 6 *** 271.8 (249.0, 296.3) 8 (1, 60) 131 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.1, 6.5)
Gallia County 6 *** 271.7 (245.8, 299.8) 9 (1, 69) 90 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.8)
Muskingum County 6 *** 271.6 (255.9, 287.9) 10 (2, 39) 249 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Guernsey County 6 *** 269.3 (246.2, 294.1) 11 (1, 64) 113 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Fayette County 6 *** 266.4 (239.8, 295.3) 12 (1, 76) 81 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.1, 3.4)
Brown County 6 *** 265.2 (244.2, 287.7) 13 (2, 66) 129 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Meigs County 6 *** 265.1 (235.9, 297.1) 14 (1, 79) 68 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Marion County 6 *** 265.0 (247.8, 283.3) 15 (3, 59) 191 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Clark County 6 *** 264.7 (252.2, 277.7) 16 (4, 48) 374 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 264.4 (239.7, 291.1) 17 (2, 75) 92 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Washington County 6 *** 264.3 (245.9, 283.8) 18 (3, 62) 177 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Preble County 6 *** 264.2 (242.3, 287.8) 19 (2, 72) 120 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Hocking County 6 *** 261.9 (236.0, 290.2) 20 (1, 79) 83 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Highland County 6 *** 259.7 (238.0, 282.9) 21 (3, 75) 116 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.0)
Ross County 6 *** 256.4 (241.1, 272.6) 22 (5, 66) 225 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Union County 6 *** 255.5 (237.1, 275.0) 23 (4, 73) 147 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Lake County 6 *** 253.8 (244.6, 263.3) 24 (11, 55) 651 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 1.4)
Licking County 6 *** 253.7 (243.2, 264.6) 25 (9, 61) 474 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Allen County 6 *** 252.8 (238.9, 267.4) 26 (7, 70) 274 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Lorain County 6 *** 252.7 (244.7, 260.9) 27 (13, 54) 834 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Columbiana County 6 *** 252.7 (239.1, 267.0) 28 (8, 68) 294 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.3)
Cuyahoga County 6 *** 252.0 (248.0, 256.0) 29 (19, 44) 3,441 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.3, 0.9)
Knox County 6 *** 251.3 (233.2, 270.5) 30 (5, 75) 161 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Richland County 6 *** 250.2 (237.5, 263.4) 31 (10, 68) 322 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.6)
Medina County 6 *** 249.7 (239.5, 260.4) 32 (13, 64) 491 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Perry County 6 *** 249.3 (226.9, 273.4) 33 (4, 83) 100 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.3)
Montgomery County 6 *** 247.3 (241.2, 253.6) 34 (21, 58) 1,366 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 3.9)
Lucas County 6 *** 247.1 (240.4, 254.0) 35 (19, 60) 1,129 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.5)
Morgan County 6 *** 247.1 (211.8, 287.1) 36 (1, 87) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Champaign County 6 *** 246.3 (224.5, 269.9) 37 (5, 83) 104 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Tuscarawas County 6 *** 246.1 (231.6, 261.2) 38 (11, 77) 243 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Huron County 6 *** 245.5 (227.3, 264.8) 39 (8, 82) 149 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.5)
Pickaway County 6 *** 245.4 (227.7, 264.3) 40 (8, 81) 150 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Logan County 6 *** 245.2 (225.2, 266.5) 41 (6, 82) 125 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Sandusky County 6 *** 245.0 (227.3, 263.7) 42 (8, 83) 161 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Miami County 6 *** 244.2 (230.7, 258.4) 43 (13, 77) 269 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.8)
Crawford County 6 *** 243.8 (222.8, 266.4) 44 (5, 84) 111 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Coshocton County 6 *** 243.5 (220.7, 268.0) 45 (5, 85) 95 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Fairfield County 6 *** 243.3 (232.3, 254.7) 46 (18, 74) 392 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Monroe County 6 *** 243.2 (207.4, 283.9) 47 (2, 87) 38 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 2.9)
Erie County 6 *** 242.6 (226.8, 259.3) 48 (13, 81) 205 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Morrow County 6 *** 242.5 (220.1, 266.7) 49 (5, 85) 97 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4)
Ashtabula County 6 *** 241.7 (228.1, 255.9) 50 (14, 80) 266 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Hamilton County 6 *** 241.7 (236.7, 246.6) 51 (32, 64) 2,018 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.6)
Clinton County 6 *** 240.7 (220.0, 263.0) 52 (7, 85) 109 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 240.6 (236.7, 244.6) 53 (36, 63) 2,937 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
Clermont County 6 *** 240.0 (230.6, 249.7) 54 (24, 73) 538 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Trumbull County 6 *** 237.9 (228.3, 247.8) 55 (26, 78) 535 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Henry County 6 *** 237.6 (211.6, 266.1) 56 (5, 87) 68 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Fulton County 6 *** 237.2 (216.3, 259.7) 57 (8, 86) 107 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.0)
Portage County 6 *** 237.1 (226.2, 248.3) 58 (27, 80) 405 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.6)
Stark County 6 *** 237.0 (229.9, 244.2) 59 (33, 73) 960 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Summit County 6 *** 236.5 (230.7, 242.4) 60 (38, 73) 1,398 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
Defiance County 6 *** 236.2 (214.2, 260.0) 61 (10, 86) 94 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Carroll County 6 *** 235.1 (209.9, 262.8) 62 (5, 87) 74 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Mercer County 6 *** 235.0 (213.7, 257.9) 63 (9, 86) 103 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Belmont County 6 *** 233.4 (217.6, 250.2) 64 (19, 85) 185 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Athens County 6 *** 231.3 (213.0, 250.7) 65 (17, 86) 131 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Hancock County 6 *** 231.3 (215.9, 247.6) 66 (21, 85) 184 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Wyandot County 6 *** 230.4 (202.7, 261.1) 67 (7, 87) 55 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Geauga County 6 *** 230.2 (216.3, 244.8) 68 (27, 85) 243 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Madison County 6 *** 229.2 (210.1, 249.7) 69 (16, 87) 111 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Paulding County 6 *** 229.2 (199.0, 262.9) 70 (6, 88) 47 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Putnam County 6 *** 228.3 (205.9, 252.7) 71 (14, 87) 85 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Wood County 6 *** 227.2 (215.1, 239.9) 72 (36, 86) 288 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Wayne County 6 *** 227.1 (214.4, 240.3) 73 (36, 86) 267 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.4)
Seneca County 6 *** 226.2 (208.1, 245.5) 74 (23, 87) 131 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Butler County 6 *** 225.8 (218.9, 232.9) 75 (55, 83) 865 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Ashland County 6 *** 225.8 (207.3, 245.5) 76 (23, 87) 124 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 2.9)
Mahoning County 6 *** 225.0 (216.2, 234.0) 77 (51, 85) 582 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Warren County 6 *** 223.1 (214.5, 231.9) 78 (55, 85) 537 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Delaware County 6 *** 222.8 (213.6, 232.3) 79 (54, 85) 458 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Greene County 6 *** 219.6 (209.2, 230.4) 80 (55, 87) 374 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Shelby County 6 *** 219.3 (200.6, 239.2) 81 (36, 87) 112 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
Auglaize County 6 *** 219.0 (199.8, 239.7) 82 (29, 87) 107 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Van Wert County 6 *** 214.5 (190.8, 240.6) 83 (24, 88) 66 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Williams County 6 *** 208.3 (187.9, 230.5) 84 (46, 88) 86 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Harrison County 6 *** 206.2 (175.1, 241.8) 85 (18, 88) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Darke County 6 *** 204.8 (187.0, 223.9) 86 (61, 88) 109 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.5)
Noble County 6 *** 204.1 (170.0, 243.7) 87 (13, 88) 35 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.2)
Holmes County 6 *** 175.9 (157.3, 196.1) 88 (84, 88) 69 stable stable trend -7.1 (-15.0, 1.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2021 2:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top