Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 470.0 (468.4, 471.6) N/A 70,429 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Adams County 6 Rural 521.2 (487.5, 556.9) 6 (1, 54) 191 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Allen County 6 Urban 452.6 (436.0, 469.8) 69 (37, 82) 603 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Ashland County 6 Rural 474.7 (451.4, 499.0) 47 (10, 76) 339 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 467.1 (450.4, 484.4) 55 (22, 76) 638 falling falling trend -0.9 (-3.9, -0.4)
Athens County 6 Rural 484.1 (459.4, 509.8) 39 (6, 73) 311 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 444.4 (420.1, 469.8) 71 (29, 86) 271 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.1, -0.7)
Belmont County 6 Urban 490.5 (469.8, 511.8) 30 (6, 64) 473 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Brown County 6 Urban 496.9 (470.7, 524.3) 19 (3, 67) 290 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Butler County 6 Urban 462.7 (453.5, 471.9) 60 (41, 72) 2,077 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Carroll County 6 Urban 468.8 (437.6, 502.0) 53 (7, 83) 188 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Champaign County 6 Rural 485.5 (458.4, 514.0) 35 (5, 74) 257 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Clark County 6 Urban 492.3 (477.6, 507.4) 27 (8, 51) 919 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 0.9)
Clermont County 6 Urban 475.7 (463.6, 488.0) 46 (20, 66) 1,257 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.1)
Clinton County 6 Rural 491.8 (465.0, 519.9) 28 (4, 70) 269 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 4.2)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 469.3 (453.0, 486.0) 52 (19, 74) 694 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 483.3 (455.3, 512.7) 40 (5, 76) 242 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Crawford County 6 Rural 457.9 (433.0, 483.9) 64 (17, 84) 278 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.3, 0.7)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 476.4 (471.6, 481.3) 44 (32, 55) 8,023 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Darke County 6 Rural 402.8 (381.6, 425.0) 86 (76, 87) 292 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Defiance County 6 Rural 477.2 (450.1, 505.7) 42 (6, 78) 248 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Delaware County 6 Urban 452.9 (440.6, 465.6) 68 (46, 80) 1,063 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Erie County 6 Urban 466.7 (448.2, 485.8) 57 (21, 78) 542 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 471.0 (457.1, 485.2) 50 (22, 71) 911 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Fayette County 6 Rural 506.0 (473.0, 540.8) 10 (1, 68) 187 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.5)
Franklin County 6 Urban 455.9 (450.6, 461.2) 65 (54, 74) 6,011 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.2)
Fulton County 6 Urban 435.7 (410.4, 462.3) 77 (39, 86) 242 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Gallia County 6 Rural 522.5 (489.9, 556.9) 4 (1, 49) 206 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Geauga County 6 Urban 466.0 (449.1, 483.4) 58 (22, 77) 646 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.6, 4.5)
Greene County 6 Urban 458.0 (444.7, 471.6) 63 (39, 77) 967 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 505.7 (477.7, 535.0) 11 (2, 61) 268 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 470.8 (464.6, 477.1) 51 (36, 61) 4,619 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Hancock County 6 Rural 431.2 (412.3, 450.9) 81 (56, 86) 414 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Hardin County 6 Rural 492.7 (460.2, 527.1) 25 (2, 75) 180 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Harrison County 6 Rural 500.6 (456.8, 547.8) 15 (1, 79) 109 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
Henry County 6 Rural 438.5 (407.9, 471.0) 75 (28, 87) 164 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 0.9)
Highland County 6 Rural 500.1 (473.6, 527.9) 16 (3, 63) 286 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 2.0)
Hocking County 6 Urban 475.7 (444.5, 508.7) 45 (4, 82) 188 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Holmes County 6 Rural 340.0 (316.0, 365.3) 88 (87, 88) 156 falling falling trend -2.5 (-7.3, -0.3)
Huron County 6 Rural 480.1 (457.5, 503.7) 41 (8, 74) 360 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Jackson County 6 Rural 516.2 (484.7, 549.3) 8 (1, 57) 215 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 516.3 (495.0, 538.4) 7 (2, 37) 501 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 3.8)
Knox County 6 Rural 493.1 (470.8, 516.2) 24 (5, 62) 401 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Lake County 6 Urban 488.5 (477.4, 499.7) 32 (12, 51) 1,624 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.5)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 566.0 (542.1, 590.9) 1 (1, 7) 450 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Licking County 6 Urban 496.8 (483.4, 510.5) 20 (7, 46) 1,105 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Logan County 6 Rural 432.3 (408.4, 457.2) 79 (50, 87) 268 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Lorain County 6 Urban 487.6 (477.8, 497.6) 33 (14, 51) 2,031 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.9)
Lucas County 6 Urban 477.1 (468.5, 485.7) 43 (24, 59) 2,531 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Madison County 6 Urban 484.4 (458.1, 511.9) 37 (5, 75) 264 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 438.8 (428.3, 449.5) 74 (63, 84) 1,480 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.8, 4.8)
Marion County 6 Rural 495.1 (473.7, 517.3) 22 (4, 59) 427 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Medina County 6 Urban 489.1 (476.4, 502.2) 31 (10, 53) 1,196 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Meigs County 6 Rural 505.4 (469.8, 543.2) 12 (1, 71) 164 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Mercer County 6 Rural 436.5 (410.9, 463.4) 76 (34, 87) 239 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Miami County 6 Urban 473.5 (457.1, 490.3) 48 (16, 72) 677 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Monroe County 6 Rural 503.9 (458.8, 552.6) 14 (1, 80) 105 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 487.4 (479.8, 495.1) 34 (15, 45) 3,387 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 2.4)
Morgan County 6 Rural 492.3 (448.7, 539.5) 26 (1, 82) 104 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Morrow County 6 Urban 444.6 (417.2, 473.6) 70 (26, 86) 210 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.2)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 509.4 (490.3, 529.2) 9 (3, 44) 571 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Noble County 6 Rural 373.4 (331.8, 419.2) 87 (71, 88) 85 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 497.9 (472.3, 524.7) 17 (3, 63) 338 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Paulding County 6 Rural 430.0 (394.0, 468.8) 82 (26, 87) 113 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Perry County 6 Urban 504.3 (474.7, 535.4) 13 (2, 64) 234 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 4.2)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 493.7 (470.6, 517.8) 23 (4, 63) 354 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.1)
Pike County 6 Rural 553.3 (518.1, 590.4) 2 (1, 19) 197 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.9)
Portage County 6 Urban 455.8 (442.2, 469.8) 66 (41, 79) 923 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Preble County 6 Rural 495.8 (469.2, 523.7) 21 (3, 69) 282 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Putnam County 6 Rural 443.0 (414.8, 472.6) 72 (26, 86) 200 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Richland County 6 Urban 484.5 (469.2, 500.2) 36 (11, 61) 821 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 3.5)
Ross County 6 Rural 521.9 (501.6, 542.9) 5 (2, 28) 525 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.5)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 471.1 (449.3, 493.9) 49 (13, 78) 381 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Scioto County 6 Rural 484.1 (464.1, 504.8) 38 (8, 69) 469 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Seneca County 6 Rural 491.3 (467.9, 515.7) 29 (4, 69) 358 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Shelby County 6 Rural 439.0 (414.7, 464.4) 73 (37, 86) 263 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Stark County 6 Urban 454.5 (445.9, 463.2) 67 (50, 76) 2,345 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Summit County 6 Urban 461.9 (454.6, 469.3) 61 (44, 71) 3,299 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.8)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 424.9 (413.9, 436.1) 84 (72, 86) 1,271 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -1.2)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 458.8 (441.5, 476.6) 62 (29, 80) 582 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Union County 6 Urban 464.4 (440.8, 488.9) 59 (15, 82) 305 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 431.8 (402.1, 463.3) 80 (32, 87) 169 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Vinton County 6 Rural 497.0 (449.3, 548.7) 18 (1, 83) 87 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Warren County 6 Urban 466.9 (455.4, 478.6) 56 (32, 71) 1,309 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 5.0)
Washington County 6 Rural 544.3 (521.7, 567.6) 3 (1, 15) 486 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 4.0)
Wayne County 6 Rural 434.7 (419.3, 450.5) 78 (59, 86) 651 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Williams County 6 Rural 417.4 (391.9, 444.2) 85 (59, 87) 215 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Wood County 6 Urban 468.1 (452.3, 484.4) 54 (22, 74) 707 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.9)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 425.9 (392.6, 461.5) 83 (34, 87) 131 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/08/2024 2:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top