Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 *** 113.3 (112.1, 114.4) N/A 7,804 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.6, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.1 (105.9, 106.3) N/A 209,535 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Noble County 6 *** 91.6 (61.0, 131.9) 84 (2, 88) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.6, 5.4)
Harrison County 6 *** 89.2 (62.2, 123.6) 86 (7, 88) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.3)
Monroe County 6 *** 111.2 (80.2, 150.1) 54 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 4.5)
Morgan County 6 *** 123.8 (91.7, 163.4) 23 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Paulding County 6 *** 102.3 (76.7, 133.5) 70 (3, 88) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.2)
Wyandot County 6 *** 107.9 (84.1, 136.4) 69 (3, 88) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.9, 3.7)
Van Wert County 6 *** 88.1 (68.7, 111.1) 85 (22, 88) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.1)
Vinton County 6 *** 184.3 (144.0, 232.4) 1 (1, 35) 14 rising rising trend 5.5 (2.6, 8.6)
Holmes County 6 *** 71.4 (56.9, 88.1) 88 (79, 88) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1)
Williams County 6 *** 88.2 (71.0, 108.3) 87 (31, 88) 18 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.2)
Gallia County 6 *** 109.6 (88.4, 134.3) 63 (4, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Meigs County 6 *** 138.6 (111.9, 169.9) 6 (1, 83) 19 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 4.6)
Henry County 6 *** 122.2 (98.8, 149.5) 25 (2, 86) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.5)
Carroll County 6 *** 124.3 (100.6, 152.0) 22 (1, 86) 19 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.4)
Putnam County 6 *** 105.8 (86.1, 128.6) 73 (6, 88) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.0)
Hocking County 6 *** 123.5 (100.8, 149.9) 24 (1, 86) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.4)
Adams County 6 *** 131.0 (107.3, 158.5) 11 (1, 85) 21 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.0)
Jackson County 6 *** 112.8 (92.7, 136.0) 46 (3, 87) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.4)
Fayette County 6 *** 135.3 (111.5, 162.6) 8 (1, 82) 23 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.4, 6.6)
Perry County 6 *** 104.8 (86.4, 126.0) 76 (7, 88) 23 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.6)
Defiance County 6 *** 110.3 (91.3, 132.0) 60 (5, 87) 24 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Morrow County 6 *** 115.0 (95.3, 137.7) 44 (3, 87) 24 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Coshocton County 6 *** 118.5 (98.3, 141.7) 31 (2, 86) 24 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.2)
Mercer County 6 *** 110.5 (91.5, 132.1) 59 (5, 87) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.5)
Hardin County 6 *** 143.1 (118.6, 170.9) 4 (1, 72) 24 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.4)
Pike County 6 *** 149.0 (123.8, 177.7) 2 (1, 61) 25 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 4.8)
Crawford County 6 *** 105.7 (88.0, 125.9) 74 (8, 87) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Clinton County 6 *** 107.6 (89.9, 127.8) 67 (8, 87) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Champaign County 6 *** 120.5 (101.1, 142.6) 29 (2, 85) 28 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.3)
Ottawa County 6 *** 133.8 (112.4, 158.0) 9 (1, 79) 28 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.4)
Logan County 6 *** 109.8 (92.6, 129.2) 62 (7, 87) 29 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 2.9)
Auglaize County 6 *** 110.9 (93.6, 130.5) 56 (7, 87) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.8)
Guernsey County 6 *** 133.4 (112.6, 157.0) 10 (1, 80) 29 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.7)
Fulton County 6 *** 126.0 (106.6, 147.8) 19 (2, 83) 30 rising rising trend 7.6 (4.7, 10.5)
Preble County 6 *** 127.2 (107.6, 149.2) 15 (2, 83) 30 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.3)
Brown County 6 *** 115.9 (98.1, 136.0) 36 (3, 86) 30 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.7)
Darke County 6 *** 107.6 (91.2, 126.0) 71 (9, 87) 31 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Madison County 6 *** 104.4 (88.6, 122.2) 77 (9, 87) 31 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Shelby County 6 *** 115.5 (98.5, 134.6) 39 (5, 86) 33 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.5)
Ashland County 6 *** 115.5 (98.7, 134.2) 40 (5, 86) 34 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.5, 6.2)
Athens County 6 *** 103.6 (88.3, 120.7) 80 (12, 87) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.9)
Highland County 6 *** 136.0 (116.4, 158.0) 7 (1, 75) 35 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.6)
Seneca County 6 *** 117.7 (101.0, 136.3) 33 (4, 85) 36 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.1, 7.7)
Sandusky County 6 *** 113.9 (98.4, 131.2) 47 (5, 85) 39 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.3)
Pickaway County 6 *** 106.6 (92.1, 122.7) 72 (11, 87) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Knox County 6 *** 117.5 (101.6, 135.1) 32 (4, 84) 40 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.6)
Belmont County 6 *** 103.9 (90.1, 119.2) 82 (18, 87) 41 stable stable trend 11.9 (-1.6, 27.2)
Washington County 6 *** 129.9 (113.1, 148.3) 12 (2, 77) 44 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.8)
Huron County 6 *** 129.4 (112.8, 147.7) 13 (2, 78) 44 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 4.6)
Erie County 6 *** 110.7 (96.6, 126.3) 57 (9, 86) 45 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Union County 6 *** 120.5 (105.4, 137.2) 27 (3, 83) 46 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Hancock County 6 *** 109.4 (95.9, 124.2) 61 (10, 86) 48 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.1)
Marion County 6 *** 120.2 (105.5, 136.5) 30 (4, 82) 49 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Jefferson County 6 *** 138.8 (122.0, 157.3) 5 (1, 49) 50 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.3)
Lawrence County 6 *** 149.4 (132.1, 168.4) 3 (1, 34) 55 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.8)
Ross County 6 *** 112.5 (99.7, 126.6) 52 (11, 85) 56 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Scioto County 6 *** 127.2 (113.0, 142.8) 16 (3, 75) 58 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Geauga County 6 *** 114.6 (101.7, 128.8) 35 (7, 84) 59 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Ashtabula County 6 *** 104.7 (93.1, 117.4) 79 (23, 86) 60 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.5, 0.8)
Tuscarawas County 6 *** 116.0 (103.2, 129.9) 41 (7, 84) 60 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Muskingum County 6 *** 126.7 (113.0, 141.5) 17 (3, 72) 63 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Allen County 6 *** 116.1 (104.0, 129.2) 37 (8, 83) 67 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Wayne County 6 *** 108.8 (97.6, 120.9) 64 (17, 85) 70 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.2)
Wood County 6 *** 103.1 (92.8, 114.2) 83 (31, 87) 75 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Miami County 6 *** 125.5 (113.2, 138.7) 20 (4, 70) 77 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.7, 2.9)
Columbiana County 6 *** 129.2 (116.6, 142.7) 14 (3, 66) 78 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.4)
Richland County 6 *** 116.7 (105.6, 128.6) 34 (8, 80) 82 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 2.8)
Clark County 6 *** 125.4 (114.3, 137.3) 21 (4, 69) 95 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 2.9)
Portage County 6 *** 108.5 (99.0, 118.7) 65 (20, 85) 99 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.5)
Greene County 6 *** 107.9 (98.5, 117.8) 66 (20, 85) 101 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Fairfield County 6 *** 115.0 (105.6, 125.1) 42 (11, 79) 110 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Licking County 6 *** 115.5 (106.4, 125.1) 38 (11, 79) 121 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Trumbull County 6 *** 114.7 (106.0, 124.0) 43 (15, 78) 130 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Medina County 6 *** 120.1 (111.0, 129.8) 28 (8, 72) 131 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.7)
Mahoning County 6 *** 104.7 (96.8, 112.9) 78 (34, 85) 134 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Clermont County 6 *** 113.4 (105.2, 122.1) 48 (15, 79) 141 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3)
Delaware County 6 *** 104.0 (96.5, 112.1) 81 (39, 85) 143 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Warren County 6 *** 105.4 (98.1, 113.0) 75 (34, 85) 158 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Lake County 6 *** 126.2 (117.7, 135.1) 18 (6, 54) 168 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.2, 3.2)
Lorain County 6 *** 122.9 (115.8, 130.4) 26 (9, 56) 224 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.9)
Stark County 6 *** 111.6 (105.3, 118.2) 53 (26, 78) 237 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.3)
Butler County 6 *** 107.2 (101.2, 113.4) 68 (34, 83) 241 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Lucas County 6 *** 110.4 (104.6, 116.4) 55 (28, 79) 278 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.4)
Montgomery County 6 *** 114.5 (109.1, 120.0) 45 (22, 72) 349 stable stable trend 1.0 (-6.6, 9.1)
Summit County 6 *** 112.3 (107.2, 117.7) 51 (26, 75) 360 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.8, 1.9)
Hamilton County 6 *** 112.5 (108.2, 116.9) 50 (29, 71) 532 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 1.4)
Cuyahoga County 6 *** 112.4 (108.9, 115.9) 49 (33, 70) 819 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.3)
Franklin County 6 *** 109.8 (106.6, 113.1) 58 (38, 74) 897 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/24/2022 6:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top