Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 241.3 (240.0, 242.6) N/A 29,814 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Adams County 6 Rural 278.3 (250.9, 308.2) 5 (1, 62) 84 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.5)
Allen County 6 Urban 230.6 (217.1, 244.7) 68 (29, 85) 245 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Ashland County 6 Rural 238.8 (219.6, 259.2) 56 (9, 85) 130 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 233.1 (219.8, 247.2) 64 (22, 83) 257 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Athens County 6 Rural 242.1 (223.2, 262.3) 49 (7, 84) 134 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 4.7)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 226.2 (206.4, 247.4) 74 (17, 87) 108 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.3, 0.0)
Belmont County 6 Urban 262.5 (245.1, 281.0) 15 (2, 61) 194 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Brown County 6 Urban 263.7 (242.2, 286.7) 14 (2, 70) 125 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.4)
Butler County 6 Urban 233.7 (226.7, 240.9) 63 (38, 79) 916 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Carroll County 6 Urban 252.8 (226.1, 282.0) 27 (2, 84) 78 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Champaign County 6 Rural 249.0 (227.1, 272.5) 36 (3, 82) 108 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Clark County 6 Urban 248.0 (235.8, 260.6) 38 (11, 71) 350 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.3)
Clermont County 6 Urban 242.2 (232.7, 252.0) 48 (19, 74) 547 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Clinton County 6 Rural 251.3 (230.1, 274.1) 32 (3, 81) 115 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 251.3 (237.6, 265.7) 31 (7, 69) 287 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 254.2 (230.8, 279.4) 23 (2, 82) 98 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Crawford County 6 Rural 240.0 (219.1, 262.4) 53 (7, 85) 110 stable stable trend 0.0 (-9.3, 2.0)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 247.3 (243.4, 251.3) 39 (24, 52) 3,361 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Darke County 6 Rural 197.1 (179.8, 215.7) 86 (71, 87) 109 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Defiance County 6 Rural 237.3 (215.5, 260.9) 59 (9, 86) 97 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Delaware County 6 Urban 219.4 (210.5, 228.6) 80 (60, 86) 478 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Erie County 6 Urban 232.4 (217.0, 248.7) 65 (20, 85) 200 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 239.9 (229.1, 251.1) 54 (20, 78) 397 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Fayette County 6 Rural 257.2 (230.9, 285.8) 20 (2, 83) 77 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.1)
Franklin County 6 Urban 230.8 (227.0, 234.7) 67 (54, 77) 2,885 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Fulton County 6 Urban 236.8 (215.9, 259.3) 61 (9, 85) 107 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.3, 2.2)
Gallia County 6 Rural 265.4 (238.7, 294.3) 12 (1, 77) 82 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Geauga County 6 Urban 242.9 (228.7, 257.9) 47 (11, 79) 259 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.3)
Greene County 6 Urban 230.4 (219.7, 241.4) 71 (34, 84) 394 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 281.7 (257.6, 307.4) 3 (1, 47) 115 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.4)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 238.8 (233.9, 243.8) 57 (36, 68) 2,001 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.5)
Hancock County 6 Rural 216.3 (201.2, 232.3) 84 (44, 87) 169 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Hardin County 6 Rural 241.3 (216.0, 268.8) 50 (4, 86) 73 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Harrison County 6 Rural 260.7 (223.9, 302.2) 16 (1, 85) 43 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Henry County 6 Rural 217.3 (192.9, 244.1) 83 (17, 87) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Highland County 6 Rural 263.7 (241.8, 287.1) 13 (1, 72) 119 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Hocking County 6 Urban 245.3 (219.9, 273.0) 45 (3, 86) 78 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Holmes County 6 Rural 155.1 (137.3, 174.4) 88 (87, 88) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Huron County 6 Rural 245.4 (227.3, 264.6) 43 (7, 82) 151 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Jackson County 6 Rural 267.8 (242.6, 294.9) 10 (1, 68) 91 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 5.2)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 280.5 (262.0, 300.2) 4 (1, 33) 202 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 4.8)
Knox County 6 Rural 244.3 (226.4, 263.4) 46 (8, 82) 156 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Lake County 6 Urban 248.4 (239.3, 257.9) 37 (14, 66) 642 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.3)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 306.1 (286.2, 327.2) 1 (1, 9) 194 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Licking County 6 Urban 254.4 (243.9, 265.2) 22 (8, 58) 487 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.4)
Logan County 6 Rural 228.5 (209.1, 249.2) 72 (15, 86) 116 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Lorain County 6 Urban 257.0 (248.9, 265.2) 21 (9, 46) 859 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.6, 4.1)
Lucas County 6 Urban 245.3 (238.5, 252.2) 44 (21, 61) 1,101 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.4)
Madison County 6 Urban 235.0 (215.8, 255.7) 62 (12, 86) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 222.6 (213.7, 231.7) 79 (53, 85) 558 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Marion County 6 Rural 250.3 (233.4, 268.1) 33 (6, 77) 178 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Medina County 6 Urban 249.1 (238.9, 259.7) 35 (12, 64) 502 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Meigs County 6 Rural 259.8 (230.8, 291.7) 17 (1, 83) 66 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.8)
Mercer County 6 Rural 238.9 (217.3, 262.1) 55 (8, 85) 104 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Miami County 6 Urban 252.5 (238.9, 266.8) 28 (6, 66) 283 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.7)
Monroe County 6 Rural 252.1 (213.9, 295.6) 30 (1, 87) 36 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.7)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 254.1 (247.9, 260.5) 24 (13, 48) 1,402 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Morgan County 6 Rural 268.2 (231.2, 310.1) 9 (1, 84) 44 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3)
Morrow County 6 Urban 222.9 (201.6, 246.1) 78 (20, 87) 90 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.5)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 276.0 (260.1, 292.6) 6 (1, 35) 253 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.7)
Noble County 6 Rural 259.7 (217.9, 307.6) 18 (1, 86) 40 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.8)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 266.2 (243.5, 290.6) 11 (1, 65) 128 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Paulding County 6 Rural 209.1 (180.7, 240.9) 85 (22, 87) 44 stable stable trend -11.0 (-21.8, 0.4)
Perry County 6 Urban 252.3 (229.7, 276.7) 29 (3, 83) 102 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 238.3 (221.0, 256.6) 58 (11, 84) 150 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Pike County 6 Rural 300.3 (271.6, 331.4) 2 (1, 27) 89 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.0, 3.6)
Portage County 6 Urban 230.5 (219.7, 241.8) 70 (34, 83) 391 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Preble County 6 Rural 253.6 (232.1, 276.7) 25 (3, 81) 116 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 1.9)
Putnam County 6 Rural 218.6 (196.7, 242.5) 82 (21, 87) 83 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Richland County 6 Urban 252.9 (240.2, 266.2) 26 (8, 64) 326 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.8)
Ross County 6 Rural 259.0 (243.4, 275.4) 19 (4, 65) 226 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 247.0 (229.0, 266.1) 40 (7, 81) 160 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Scioto County 6 Rural 270.6 (253.7, 288.3) 7 (2, 45) 210 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Seneca County 6 Rural 237.2 (218.7, 256.9) 60 (10, 85) 139 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.3)
Shelby County 6 Rural 230.6 (211.1, 251.4) 69 (16, 86) 116 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Stark County 6 Urban 240.4 (233.2, 247.8) 52 (27, 72) 958 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Summit County 6 Urban 240.4 (234.5, 246.5) 51 (30, 68) 1,393 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 225.8 (216.4, 235.5) 75 (47, 85) 502 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 246.4 (231.8, 261.8) 41 (10, 77) 240 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.7)
Union County 6 Urban 245.5 (228.4, 263.7) 42 (8, 81) 157 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 218.8 (194.7, 245.2) 81 (20, 87) 67 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
Vinton County 6 Rural 249.3 (212.1, 291.8) 34 (1, 87) 37 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 3.9)
Warren County 6 Urban 227.3 (218.9, 235.9) 73 (49, 84) 587 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 4.4)
Washington County 6 Rural 269.2 (250.5, 288.9) 8 (1, 54) 181 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.6)
Wayne County 6 Rural 223.0 (210.4, 236.3) 77 (44, 86) 261 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Williams County 6 Rural 195.6 (175.7, 217.2) 87 (65, 88) 80 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Wood County 6 Urban 232.1 (219.7, 245.0) 66 (28, 84) 289 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.3)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 224.5 (196.8, 255.3) 76 (8, 87) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 9:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top