Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 *** 505.2 (502.7, 507.7) N/A 33,788 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 487.4 (486.9, 487.8) N/A 859,984 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Noble County 6 *** 308.2 (261.5, 362.2) 88 (87, 88) 44 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.5, 7.2)
Holmes County 6 *** 403.4 (365.2, 444.4) 87 (72, 88) 85 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Harrison County 6 *** 431.4 (376.4, 493.0) 86 (22, 87) 48 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Wyandot County 6 *** 435.7 (387.4, 488.8) 85 (30, 87) 62 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.9, -2.6)
Shelby County 6 *** 447.7 (412.1, 485.5) 84 (45, 87) 126 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Greene County 6 *** 448.4 (428.9, 468.5) 83 (66, 87) 425 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Darke County 6 *** 455.1 (422.2, 490.0) 82 (43, 87) 149 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Wayne County 6 *** 456.7 (434.0, 480.5) 81 (56, 87) 318 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Belmont County 6 *** 457.3 (429.3, 486.9) 80 (47, 87) 213 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Williams County 6 *** 460.1 (420.9, 502.3) 79 (21, 87) 107 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Butler County 6 *** 461.6 (447.8, 475.7) 78 (64, 86) 900 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Geauga County 6 *** 464.0 (439.5, 489.6) 77 (46, 86) 294 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Auglaize County 6 *** 468.0 (432.3, 506.1) 76 (23, 87) 134 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Delaware County 6 *** 472.9 (453.1, 493.4) 75 (46, 84) 468 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2)
Warren County 6 *** 474.0 (456.0, 492.5) 74 (48, 84) 560 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Miami County 6 *** 475.8 (451.5, 501.1) 73 (37, 85) 305 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.5, 10.7)
Mahoning County 6 *** 476.3 (460.4, 492.7) 72 (47, 83) 725 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Putnam County 6 *** 482.3 (440.0, 527.9) 71 (11, 87) 102 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Ashland County 6 *** 483.2 (449.6, 518.9) 70 (17, 85) 162 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Carroll County 6 *** 483.5 (439.6, 531.1) 69 (9, 87) 97 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.4)
Summit County 6 *** 484.4 (473.3, 495.7) 68 (49, 78) 1,548 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Hocking County 6 *** 484.8 (439.6, 533.6) 67 (8, 86) 91 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Morgan County 6 *** 485.1 (425.1, 552.1) 66 (3, 87) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Portage County 6 *** 490.2 (469.6, 511.6) 65 (26, 80) 455 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.6, -0.7)
Clermont County 6 *** 491.1 (472.4, 510.3) 64 (31, 79) 566 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Defiance County 6 *** 492.2 (451.7, 535.5) 63 (9, 86) 116 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Erie County 6 *** 493.0 (465.8, 521.5) 62 (16, 83) 266 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Stark County 6 *** 493.3 (480.3, 506.6) 61 (36, 74) 1,155 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Crawford County 6 *** 493.7 (456.5, 533.4) 60 (11, 85) 138 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Mercer County 6 *** 495.0 (455.8, 536.8) 59 (9, 85) 126 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Tuscarawas County 6 *** 495.2 (469.3, 522.2) 58 (17, 81) 291 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Ashtabula County 6 *** 495.2 (470.4, 521.2) 57 (19, 81) 315 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Columbiana County 6 *** 496.8 (473.0, 521.6) 56 (17, 80) 350 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.2, 9.1)
Hancock County 6 *** 499.5 (469.7, 530.7) 55 (11, 81) 221 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Trumbull County 6 *** 500.7 (483.4, 518.5) 54 (23, 73) 679 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Monroe County 6 *** 501.3 (442.1, 567.4) 53 (2, 87) 56 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Van Wert County 6 *** 501.4 (455.1, 551.5) 52 (5, 86) 90 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Seneca County 6 *** 502.1 (467.6, 538.6) 51 (9, 84) 169 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Wood County 6 *** 502.1 (477.7, 527.5) 50 (15, 78) 338 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Fairfield County 6 *** 502.4 (480.9, 524.7) 49 (17, 76) 431 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Henry County 6 *** 502.9 (455.2, 554.5) 48 (4, 86) 86 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Montgomery County 6 *** 503.9 (492.5, 515.6) 47 (29, 66) 1,550 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Lake County 6 *** 504.4 (487.8, 521.5) 46 (20, 70) 741 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Paulding County 6 *** 505.7 (448.4, 568.6) 45 (2, 86) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Ottawa County 6 *** 508.5 (472.5, 546.8) 44 (7, 81) 167 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Sandusky County 6 *** 510.6 (477.6, 545.3) 43 (6, 82) 190 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Brown County 6 *** 512.8 (475.2, 552.8) 42 (6, 81) 144 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Franklin County 6 *** 515.1 (506.4, 524.0) 41 (21, 53) 2,871 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Clark County 6 *** 515.9 (493.7, 538.9) 40 (11, 70) 431 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.2, 6.4)
Hamilton County 6 *** 516.5 (506.6, 526.6) 39 (20, 54) 2,187 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.1, 4.8)
Champaign County 6 *** 517.1 (476.0, 561.0) 38 (3, 82) 124 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Lucas County 6 *** 517.3 (503.9, 530.9) 37 (16, 58) 1,227 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Jefferson County 6 *** 518.0 (487.7, 549.9) 36 (6, 74) 238 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Clinton County 6 *** 519.4 (478.5, 563.1) 35 (3, 80) 127 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Richland County 6 *** 519.7 (496.7, 543.5) 34 (10, 67) 402 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Athens County 6 *** 519.8 (481.7, 560.1) 33 (3, 80) 153 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Meigs County 6 *** 520.2 (468.9, 576.1) 32 (2, 85) 81 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Lorain County 6 *** 521.0 (505.9, 536.4) 31 (13, 57) 965 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Medina County 6 *** 522.3 (502.6, 542.7) 30 (9, 61) 564 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Marion County 6 *** 522.8 (490.9, 556.2) 29 (4, 73) 213 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Coshocton County 6 *** 522.8 (481.0, 567.5) 28 (3, 81) 123 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Fulton County 6 *** 523.8 (483.1, 567.1) 27 (2, 80) 131 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Perry County 6 *** 524.6 (479.8, 572.6) 26 (2, 81) 112 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Cuyahoga County 6 *** 525.8 (518.2, 533.5) 25 (16, 42) 3,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Huron County 6 *** 526.7 (491.6, 563.7) 24 (4, 74) 179 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Licking County 6 *** 528.2 (507.5, 549.7) 23 (6, 57) 522 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Scioto County 6 *** 528.5 (498.5, 559.9) 22 (4, 69) 243 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Morrow County 6 *** 528.5 (484.5, 575.6) 21 (2, 82) 115 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Madison County 6 *** 529.5 (489.0, 572.6) 20 (2, 78) 135 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Knox County 6 *** 531.8 (498.0, 567.4) 19 (3, 71) 196 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Preble County 6 *** 532.8 (492.7, 575.6) 18 (2, 75) 140 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Guernsey County 6 *** 533.1 (492.7, 576.2) 17 (2, 73) 137 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Pickaway County 6 *** 536.8 (501.0, 574.5) 16 (2, 69) 175 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Logan County 6 *** 539.0 (500.0, 580.4) 15 (1, 73) 152 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Fayette County 6 *** 540.7 (490.8, 594.5) 14 (1, 79) 92 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Highland County 6 *** 542.4 (502.3, 585.1) 13 (1, 72) 142 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Hardin County 6 *** 546.4 (496.6, 599.9) 12 (1, 76) 93 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Union County 6 *** 551.5 (510.0, 595.5) 11 (1, 64) 143 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Muskingum County 6 *** 555.0 (525.7, 585.5) 10 (1, 45) 285 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Washington County 6 *** 556.2 (523.4, 590.7) 9 (1, 50) 231 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Allen County 6 *** 558.9 (531.9, 586.9) 8 (1, 39) 341 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Adams County 6 *** 570.8 (519.9, 625.7) 7 (1, 64) 99 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Ross County 6 *** 573.2 (541.9, 605.9) 6 (1, 29) 269 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Jackson County 6 *** 578.8 (529.3, 631.8) 5 (1, 54) 110 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Pike County 6 *** 582.4 (531.0, 637.6) 4 (1, 48) 100 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.0)
Gallia County 6 *** 586.0 (537.1, 638.5) 3 (1, 47) 112 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.4)
Lawrence County 6 *** 588.2 (553.1, 625.0) 2 (1, 22) 222 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Vinton County 6 *** 610.3 (532.4, 696.9) 1 (1, 70) 49 stable stable trend -10.8 (-30.3, 14.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2021 1:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top