Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Esophagus (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 5.6 (5.5, 5.8) N/A 873 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 4.5 (4.5, 4.5) N/A 17,922 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Crawford County 6 10.0 (6.6, 14.6) 1 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.9, 10.7)
Coshocton County 6 9.7 (6.0, 14.9) 2 (1, 62) 5
*
*
Williams County 6 9.3 (6.0, 14.1) 3 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.9, 9.8)
Gallia County 6 9.2 (5.7, 14.5) 4 (1, 65) 4
*
*
Auglaize County 6 9.1 (6.0, 13.4) 5 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Perry County 6 8.8 (5.3, 13.9) 6 (1, 65) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.8, 5.6)
Guernsey County 6 8.8 (5.7, 13.2) 7 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Knox County 6 8.6 (6.0, 12.1) 8 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.0, 8.2)
Champaign County 6 8.6 (5.4, 13.2) 9 (1, 63) 5
*
*
Muskingum County 6 8.5 (6.2, 11.4) 10 (1, 51) 10 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.4, 7.4)
Lawrence County 6 8.0 (5.6, 11.3) 11 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.5, 7.5)
Hocking County 6 8.0 (4.6, 13.3) 12 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Shelby County 6 7.6 (4.8, 11.6) 13 (1, 66) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.5, 5.5)
Columbiana County 6 7.6 (5.8, 10.0) 14 (2, 53) 12 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.8, 8.6)
Hardin County 6 7.6 (4.3, 12.7) 15 (1, 66) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.8, 7.5)
Richland County 6 7.5 (5.8, 9.7) 16 (2, 56) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.2, 5.5)
Brown County 6 7.4 (4.7, 11.2) 17 (1, 66) 5
*
*
Ashland County 6 7.3 (4.7, 10.9) 18 (1, 65) 5
*
*
Ross County 6 7.1 (5.0, 10.0) 19 (1, 64) 7 rising rising trend 10.2 (0.6, 38.8)
Huron County 6 7.1 (4.7, 10.3) 20 (1, 65) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.9, 4.9)
Clark County 6 7.1 (5.4, 9.1) 21 (3, 58) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 4.0)
Scioto County 6 6.9 (4.8, 9.7) 22 (2, 63) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.5, 7.7)
Highland County 6 6.9 (4.2, 11.0) 23 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.4, 8.6)
Belmont County 6 6.7 (4.6, 9.5) 24 (2, 65) 7
*
*
Lorain County 6 6.5 (5.4, 7.7) 25 (8, 53) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.3)
Allen County 6 6.4 (4.6, 8.8) 26 (3, 65) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.9)
Medina County 6 6.4 (5.1, 8.0) 27 (7, 60) 16 stable stable trend 6.0 (-2.5, 24.3)
Hancock County 6 6.4 (4.4, 9.1) 28 (3, 66) 7
*
*
Athens County 6 6.3 (3.8, 9.8) 29 (2, 66) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-4.6, 11.2)
Clermont County 6 6.2 (4.9, 7.8) 30 (8, 61) 17 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.6, 6.7)
Ashtabula County 6 6.1 (4.5, 8.3) 31 (5, 65) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 3.3)
Union County 6 6.1 (3.6, 9.8) 32 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Marion County 6 6.0 (4.0, 8.9) 33 (4, 66) 6 stable stable trend 16.8 (-2.4, 59.3)
Butler County 6 5.9 (4.9, 7.1) 34 (14, 60) 26 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.5, 6.4)
Washington County 6 5.9 (3.9, 8.8) 35 (3, 66) 6
*
*
Lucas County 6 5.8 (4.9, 6.8) 36 (15, 59) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Jefferson County 6 5.8 (3.8, 8.6) 37 (4, 66) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.8, 8.4)
Defiance County 6 5.8 (3.2, 9.7) 38 (1, 66) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.8, 5.6)
Trumbull County 6 5.7 (4.6, 7.2) 39 (13, 63) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 4.0)
Pickaway County 6 5.7 (3.5, 9.0) 40 (3, 66) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.1, 3.4)
Seneca County 6 5.7 (3.5, 8.8) 41 (4, 66) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.0, 4.8)
Franklin County 6 5.6 (5.0, 6.3) 42 (23, 56) 72 rising rising trend 10.0 (1.0, 16.5)
Madison County 6 5.6 (3.2, 9.4) 43 (3, 66) 3
*
*
Mahoning County 6 5.5 (4.4, 6.8) 44 (16, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.8)
Logan County 6 5.5 (3.2, 9.0) 45 (3, 66) 4 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.0, 1.3)
Fairfield County 6 5.4 (4.0, 7.1) 46 (13, 66) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.6)
Montgomery County 6 5.4 (4.6, 6.2) 47 (24, 62) 39 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.4)
Erie County 6 5.3 (3.5, 7.8) 48 (9, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.2)
Hamilton County 6 5.2 (4.6, 5.9) 49 (27, 62) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.0)
Licking County 6 5.2 (3.9, 6.7) 50 (16, 66) 12 stable stable trend -4.6 (-27.3, 7.2)
Lake County 6 5.1 (4.1, 6.4) 51 (20, 66) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.7)
Ottawa County 6 5.1 (2.8, 8.8) 52 (4, 66) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.2, 4.2)
Sandusky County 6 5.0 (3.1, 7.8) 53 (8, 66) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.5, 2.2)
Wood County 6 5.0 (3.5, 6.9) 54 (14, 66) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.9, 7.4)
Portage County 6 4.9 (3.7, 6.6) 55 (17, 66) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 3.2)
Summit County 6 4.9 (4.2, 5.7) 56 (30, 64) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.1)
Cuyahoga County 6 4.7 (4.3, 5.2) 57 (39, 64) 84 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Stark County 6 4.7 (3.9, 5.6) 58 (32, 66) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.8)
Wayne County 6 4.7 (3.2, 6.6) 59 (17, 66) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.8, 7.1)
Geauga County 6 4.6 (3.2, 6.6) 60 (16, 66) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.1, 3.9)
Tuscarawas County 6 4.6 (3.1, 6.7) 61 (16, 66) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.0, 6.0)
Darke County 6 4.5 (2.7, 7.4) 62 (11, 66) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.0, 0.4)
Miami County 6 4.5 (3.1, 6.3) 63 (20, 66) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.0, 0.7)
Greene County 6 4.4 (3.2, 5.9) 64 (25, 66) 10 falling falling trend -15.8 (-28.0, -1.9)
Delaware County 6 4.0 (2.9, 5.4) 65 (34, 66) 9 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.1, 2.1)
Warren County 6 3.8 (2.8, 5.0) 66 (39, 66) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 3.1)
Adams County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Preble County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/23/2024 10:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adams, Carroll, Clinton, Fayette, Fulton, Harrison, Henry, Holmes, Jackson, Meigs, Mercer, Monroe, Morgan, Morrow, Noble, Paulding, Pike, Preble, Putnam, Van Wert, Vinton, Wyandot

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top