Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 38.9 (38.4, 39.3) N/A 5,707 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 32.5 (24.0, 43.3) 84 (11, 88) 10 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 0.8)
Wood County 6 Urban 42.0 (37.3, 47.2) 40 (8, 78) 61 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Williams County 6 Rural 50.2 (41.7, 60.0) 5 (1, 73) 27 stable stable trend 13.3 (-0.1, 22.5)
Wayne County 6 Rural 36.9 (32.5, 41.8) 68 (23, 86) 55 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 7.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 46.6 (40.1, 54.0) 18 (1, 70) 41 stable stable trend -3.9 (-12.8, 0.0)
Warren County 6 Urban 33.4 (30.4, 36.7) 81 (54, 88) 92 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Vinton County 6 Rural 48.9 (34.7, 67.4) 9 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.6)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 44.5 (34.9, 56.0) 27 (1, 86) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.8)
Union County 6 Urban 38.3 (31.6, 46.0) 60 (9, 88) 24 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.5)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 47.2 (41.7, 53.2) 15 (1, 59) 58 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.7, 12.4)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 36.6 (33.4, 40.0) 70 (34, 85) 108 falling falling trend -3.3 (-8.6, -2.1)
Summit County 6 Urban 35.4 (33.4, 37.5) 73 (53, 85) 252 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.9, 5.2)
Stark County 6 Urban 34.5 (32.2, 37.0) 76 (52, 86) 177 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 3.3)
Shelby County 6 Rural 38.7 (31.9, 46.7) 57 (7, 88) 24 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.5, -0.3)
Seneca County 6 Rural 44.1 (37.3, 51.9) 29 (2, 80) 32 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.6)
Scioto County 6 Rural 39.2 (33.7, 45.5) 55 (11, 86) 38 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.3)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 47.5 (40.6, 55.2) 13 (1, 69) 37 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.6)
Ross County 6 Rural 43.4 (37.7, 49.9) 31 (4, 78) 43 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Richland County 6 Urban 40.1 (35.8, 44.9) 47 (15, 81) 67 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Putnam County 6 Rural 36.4 (28.6, 45.7) 71 (9, 88) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.7, -1.0)
Preble County 6 Rural 40.0 (32.8, 48.5) 49 (5, 87) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Portage County 6 Urban 40.1 (36.1, 44.4) 48 (16, 80) 79 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Pike County 6 Rural 42.4 (33.2, 53.6) 35 (1, 87) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.3)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 46.3 (39.3, 54.2) 20 (1, 74) 32 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Perry County 6 Urban 44.5 (36.0, 54.6) 26 (1, 84) 20 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.1)
Paulding County 6 Rural 49.6 (38.1, 63.8) 8 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 2.1)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 43.2 (35.9, 51.7) 32 (2, 84) 29 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Noble County 6 Rural 42.1 (28.8, 59.9) 38 (1, 88) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -0.9)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 42.2 (36.8, 48.3) 36 (7, 79) 46 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Morrow County 6 Urban 33.1 (26.0, 41.8) 82 (20, 88) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.7)
Morgan County 6 Rural 31.7 (21.5, 45.8) 87 (5, 88) 7 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.8, -1.5)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 38.6 (36.5, 40.9) 59 (33, 75) 264 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Monroe County 6 Rural 44.2 (32.0, 60.2) 28 (1, 88) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.5)
Miami County 6 Urban 38.1 (33.5, 43.2) 63 (21, 86) 53 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Mercer County 6 Rural 45.7 (37.5, 55.3) 23 (1, 83) 24 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.3, -0.4)
Meigs County 6 Rural 39.6 (30.6, 50.8) 53 (2, 88) 14 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.4)
Medina County 6 Urban 36.9 (33.4, 40.6) 69 (32, 85) 87 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Marion County 6 Rural 45.0 (38.6, 52.2) 25 (2, 75) 37 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 37.7 (34.7, 40.9) 66 (32, 82) 129 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Madison County 6 Urban 53.0 (44.6, 62.6) 3 (1, 51) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.8)
Lucas County 6 Urban 40.7 (38.2, 43.3) 44 (23, 67) 214 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Lorain County 6 Urban 37.3 (34.6, 40.2) 67 (35, 82) 153 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 3.8)
Logan County 6 Rural 32.0 (25.8, 39.4) 86 (27, 88) 20 falling falling trend -13.2 (-28.4, -3.1)
Licking County 6 Urban 40.5 (36.7, 44.6) 45 (17, 78) 87 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 52.5 (45.3, 60.7) 4 (1, 43) 40 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.6, 13.9)
Lake County 6 Urban 35.3 (32.3, 38.5) 74 (44, 86) 113 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Knox County 6 Rural 41.2 (35.0, 48.3) 43 (5, 85) 34 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.1)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 47.2 (40.9, 54.4) 14 (1, 66) 44 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.8, 10.8)
Jackson County 6 Rural 45.8 (36.8, 56.4) 22 (1, 84) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Huron County 6 Rural 48.2 (41.0, 56.4) 11 (1, 67) 34 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Holmes County 6 Rural 32.3 (25.2, 40.8) 85 (23, 88) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.3)
Hocking County 6 Urban 39.2 (30.5, 49.8) 54 (3, 88) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.0, -0.2)
Highland County 6 Rural 46.6 (38.7, 55.7) 17 (1, 79) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Henry County 6 Rural 48.1 (38.2, 59.8) 12 (1, 83) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.4)
Harrison County 6 Rural 41.7 (30.3, 56.7) 42 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.1, 17.3)
Hardin County 6 Rural 45.6 (35.8, 57.3) 24 (1, 86) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.3)
Hancock County 6 Rural 38.0 (32.6, 44.1) 64 (14, 87) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 38.2 (36.4, 40.0) 61 (38, 74) 369 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 3.6)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 46.5 (38.2, 56.1) 19 (1, 81) 24 falling falling trend -7.8 (-23.1, -1.2)
Greene County 6 Urban 34.0 (30.3, 38.0) 78 (45, 88) 68 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Geauga County 6 Urban 32.7 (28.3, 37.6) 83 (45, 88) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Gallia County 6 Rural 46.8 (37.0, 58.5) 16 (1, 85) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.2)
Fulton County 6 Urban 33.7 (26.8, 41.9) 79 (21, 88) 18 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.4)
Franklin County 6 Urban 34.1 (32.7, 35.6) 77 (64, 86) 438 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Fayette County 6 Rural 53.5 (42.9, 65.9) 2 (1, 67) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 4.2)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 37.8 (33.9, 42.1) 65 (25, 85) 71 stable stable trend 4.1 (-2.6, 13.4)
Erie County 6 Urban 38.1 (33.1, 43.8) 62 (18, 87) 44 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Delaware County 6 Urban 33.7 (30.3, 37.3) 80 (47, 88) 76 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Defiance County 6 Rural 50.0 (41.5, 59.8) 7 (1, 69) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.9)
Darke County 6 Rural 36.1 (30.0, 43.2) 72 (18, 88) 26 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.2, -3.1)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 40.2 (38.8, 41.6) 46 (31, 62) 665 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Crawford County 6 Rural 42.6 (35.2, 51.2) 34 (2, 85) 25 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.0)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 43.1 (35.1, 52.4) 33 (1, 85) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.8)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 42.2 (37.4, 47.6) 37 (7, 77) 61 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Clinton County 6 Rural 42.0 (34.4, 50.9) 39 (3, 86) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Clermont County 6 Urban 39.8 (36.3, 43.6) 51 (19, 76) 102 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.2, 5.4)
Clark County 6 Urban 39.9 (35.7, 44.4) 50 (17, 81) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Champaign County 6 Rural 41.9 (34.2, 51.0) 41 (2, 86) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.3)
Carroll County 6 Urban 27.0 (20.1, 35.8) 88 (49, 88) 11 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.6)
Butler County 6 Urban 39.8 (37.1, 42.6) 52 (26, 72) 173 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Brown County 6 Urban 50.0 (42.0, 59.3) 6 (1, 64) 29 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.2, 10.1)
Belmont County 6 Urban 46.1 (39.9, 53.0) 21 (2, 71) 44 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.1, 17.3)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 43.6 (36.2, 52.1) 30 (1, 84) 26 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.7)
Athens County 6 Rural 38.7 (31.9, 46.5) 58 (8, 87) 24 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.9)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 34.9 (30.5, 39.8) 75 (32, 88) 47 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Ashland County 6 Rural 48.3 (41.2, 56.5) 10 (1, 67) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Allen County 6 Urban 38.9 (34.0, 44.3) 56 (17, 85) 50 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Adams County 6 Rural 54.0 (43.4, 66.5) 1 (1, 67) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2024 6:34 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top