Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 7.7 (7.5, 7.9) N/A 1,228 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Allen County 6 Urban 4.9 (3.4, 7.0) 69 (30, 69) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.7)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 6.0 (4.3, 8.2) 57 (14, 69) 9 falling falling trend -5.7 (-14.0, -0.5)
Belmont County 6 Urban 7.0 (4.8, 9.9) 41 (5, 69) 8 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.8, 11.6)
Butler County 6 Urban 7.5 (6.5, 8.8) 34 (12, 56) 36 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.5, 4.7)
Clark County 6 Urban 9.0 (7.2, 11.2) 13 (2, 51) 18 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.8, 9.2)
Clermont County 6 Urban 8.5 (7.0, 10.2) 19 (4, 56) 24 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.3, 7.6)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 8.8 (8.2, 9.4) 16 (8, 32) 160 stable stable trend -0.6 (-9.7, 2.5)
Delaware County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.4, 7.3) 62 (24, 69) 13 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.0, 6.5)
Erie County 6 Urban 6.0 (4.1, 8.5) 58 (12, 69) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 5.3)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 7.8 (6.1, 9.8) 32 (5, 63) 15 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 8.2)
Franklin County 6 Urban 8.0 (7.3, 8.7) 26 (12, 42) 111 stable stable trend -0.4 (-7.3, 2.1)
Fulton County 6 Urban 7.7 (4.7, 12.0) 33 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Geauga County 6 Urban 5.8 (4.2, 8.0) 59 (17, 69) 9 stable stable trend -5.9 (-24.6, 6.8)
Greene County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.2, 8.3) 46 (15, 68) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.2, 5.5)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 8.1 (7.3, 8.9) 24 (11, 43) 86 stable stable trend -2.7 (-14.6, 4.0)
Hocking County 6 Urban 7.8 (4.5, 13.0) 31 (1, 69) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.7, 8.9)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 6.1 (4.2, 8.8) 52 (10, 69) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.4)
Lake County 6 Urban 6.1 (5.1, 7.4) 51 (25, 67) 23 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.8, 6.3)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 8.8 (6.1, 12.3) 17 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.3, 8.9)
Licking County 6 Urban 6.4 (5.0, 8.1) 47 (17, 68) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-17.3, 2.4)
Lorain County 6 Urban 8.2 (7.0, 9.5) 22 (7, 48) 36 stable stable trend -7.3 (-14.6, 2.9)
Lucas County 6 Urban 8.9 (7.8, 10.2) 14 (4, 38) 50 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.7, 6.7)
Madison County 6 Urban 6.1 (3.6, 9.8) 53 (5, 69) 4
*
*
Mahoning County 6 Urban 8.8 (7.4, 10.3) 15 (4, 45) 32 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.1, 6.5)
Medina County 6 Urban 7.3 (5.9, 9.0) 37 (8, 63) 19 stable stable trend 6.6 (-0.9, 18.4)
Miami County 6 Urban 5.7 (4.1, 7.7) 63 (18, 69) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.8, 7.6)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 9.9 (8.9, 11.0) 9 (3, 24) 75 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.4, 5.8)
Morrow County 6 Urban 6.3 (3.6, 10.5) 48 (2, 69) 3
*
*
Ottawa County 6 Urban 6.9 (4.5, 10.6) 43 (4, 69) 5
*
*
Perry County 6 Urban 8.1 (4.7, 13.1) 25 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Pickaway County 6 Urban 12.6 (9.2, 16.9) 1 (1, 36) 9 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.5, 8.7)
Portage County 6 Urban 6.2 (4.7, 8.0) 49 (17, 69) 13 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.5, 8.3)
Richland County 6 Urban 8.0 (6.2, 10.1) 27 (4, 62) 15 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.1, 7.9)
Stark County 6 Urban 7.0 (6.0, 8.2) 39 (17, 60) 38 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.9, 6.3)
Summit County 6 Urban 6.9 (6.1, 7.8) 42 (23, 59) 53 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.7, 5.4)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 7.8 (6.5, 9.4) 30 (8, 57) 26 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 6.2)
Union County 6 Urban 6.0 (3.6, 9.4) 56 (6, 69) 4
*
*
Warren County 6 Urban 6.6 (5.3, 8.1) 45 (18, 67) 19 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.0, 9.0)
Wood County 6 Urban 5.8 (4.2, 7.8) 60 (19, 69) 10 stable stable trend -25.9 (-50.0, 2.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 9.3 (5.4, 15.3) 12 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Ashland County 6 Rural 7.8 (5.1, 11.6) 29 (1, 69) 5 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.8, 8.3)
Athens County 6 Rural 7.0 (4.4, 10.8) 40 (2, 69) 5
*
*
Champaign County 6 Rural 8.0 (5.0, 12.4) 28 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Clinton County 6 Rural 5.3 (3.0, 8.9) 66 (8, 69) 3
*
*
Columbiana County 6 Rural 9.6 (7.4, 12.3) 10 (1, 52) 14 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.2, 6.9)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 10.4 (6.8, 15.4) 5 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Crawford County 6 Rural 9.5 (6.3, 13.9) 11 (1, 66) 6
*
*
Darke County 6 Rural 5.1 (3.1, 8.1) 68 (13, 69) 4
*
*
Fayette County 6 Rural 10.5 (6.3, 16.7) 4 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Guernsey County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.6, 15.3) 6 (1, 66) 6
*
*
Hancock County 6 Rural 8.6 (6.1, 11.9) 18 (1, 65) 8 rising rising trend 24.7 (4.3, 62.3)
Highland County 6 Rural 10.1 (6.7, 14.8) 8 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Huron County 6 Rural 6.1 (3.9, 9.4) 50 (7, 69) 5
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural 8.4 (4.9, 13.5) 21 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Knox County 6 Rural 6.8 (4.5, 10.0) 44 (4, 69) 6 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.1, 10.9)
Logan County 6 Rural 5.1 (2.9, 8.5) 67 (11, 69) 3
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural 8.4 (5.9, 11.8) 20 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.6, 11.1)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 8.1 (5.9, 10.9) 23 (3, 65) 10
*
*
Pike County 6 Rural 10.2 (6.1, 16.4) 7 (1, 68) 4
*
*
Preble County 6 Rural 5.7 (3.3, 9.5) 61 (6, 69) 4
*
*
Ross County 6 Rural 11.1 (8.5, 14.4) 3 (1, 39) 12 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.3, 10.9)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 7.3 (4.9, 10.6) 38 (3, 69) 6 rising rising trend 6.9 (1.8, 14.7)
Scioto County 6 Rural 11.5 (8.6, 15.0) 2 (1, 38) 12 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.6, 8.4)
Seneca County 6 Rural 6.0 (3.8, 9.2) 54 (9, 69) 5
*
*
Shelby County 6 Rural 7.5 (4.7, 11.4) 36 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 5.3 (3.8, 7.4) 65 (22, 69) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.7, 7.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 6.0 (3.9, 9.1) 55 (8, 69) 5 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.6, 9.0)
Wayne County 6 Rural 5.6 (4.0, 7.6) 64 (22, 69) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.9, 8.6)
Williams County 6 Rural 7.5 (4.5, 11.9) 35 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Auglaize County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Defiance County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallia County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meigs County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Paulding County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Wert County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vinton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyandot County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 6:02 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top