Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 64.3 (63.7, 64.8) N/A 10,119 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 65.6 (53.8, 79.5) 46 (11, 85) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Wood County 6 Urban 52.4 (47.4, 57.8) 81 (59, 87) 83 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Williams County 6 Rural 61.6 (52.4, 72.2) 59 (21, 86) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Wayne County 6 Rural 58.4 (53.1, 64.1) 68 (38, 84) 93 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Washington County 6 Rural 77.8 (70.0, 86.4) 23 (6, 49) 76 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Warren County 6 Urban 54.5 (50.6, 58.5) 78 (58, 85) 155 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.8)
Vinton County 6 Rural 97.6 (78.1, 121.2) 2 (1, 48) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.6)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 56.7 (46.9, 68.2) 75 (28, 88) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.8)
Union County 6 Urban 53.6 (45.6, 62.5) 79 (41, 88) 34 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 65.2 (59.1, 71.9) 48 (26, 77) 88 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 64.4 (60.5, 68.7) 51 (33, 70) 207 falling falling trend -3.5 (-13.7, -1.3)
Summit County 6 Urban 59.9 (57.4, 62.5) 64 (49, 76) 454 falling falling trend -1.8 (-4.4, -1.1)
Stark County 6 Urban 60.7 (57.7, 63.7) 61 (45, 77) 334 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Shelby County 6 Rural 57.8 (49.5, 67.3) 72 (29, 87) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Seneca County 6 Rural 65.7 (57.7, 74.6) 45 (20, 80) 51 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Scioto County 6 Rural 85.2 (77.3, 93.8) 15 (2, 32) 88 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 65.1 (57.4, 73.5) 49 (22, 82) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Ross County 6 Rural 91.9 (83.8, 100.6) 4 (1, 22) 99 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.7)
Richland County 6 Urban 66.0 (60.8, 71.7) 43 (26, 72) 120 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Putnam County 6 Rural 49.0 (40.2, 59.3) 85 (49, 88) 23 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Preble County 6 Rural 81.3 (71.2, 92.7) 19 (2, 51) 49 falling falling trend -9.2 (-13.8, -3.9)
Portage County 6 Urban 60.5 (55.8, 65.5) 62 (36, 80) 129 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Pike County 6 Rural 105.7 (91.6, 121.6) 1 (1, 19) 41 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 80.0 (71.0, 89.9) 20 (4, 46) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Perry County 6 Urban 89.2 (77.4, 102.4) 9 (1, 34) 44 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
Paulding County 6 Rural 63.2 (50.1, 78.9) 54 (10, 88) 17 falling falling trend -4.6 (-18.1, -0.8)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 59.4 (51.6, 68.4) 65 (30, 85) 45 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Noble County 6 Rural 50.4 (36.8, 68.0) 83 (28, 88) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.9)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 76.2 (69.2, 83.8) 25 (10, 49) 91 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Morrow County 6 Urban 71.2 (60.8, 83.0) 34 (9, 77) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Morgan County 6 Rural 88.5 (71.9, 108.5) 11 (1, 59) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.6)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 68.7 (66.0, 71.5) 38 (28, 52) 505 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Monroe County 6 Rural 66.5 (52.2, 84.4) 41 (6, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.4)
Miami County 6 Urban 62.5 (57.0, 68.6) 56 (31, 79) 96 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.4)
Mercer County 6 Rural 50.1 (41.9, 59.5) 84 (49, 88) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.4)
Meigs County 6 Rural 89.1 (75.0, 105.3) 10 (1, 43) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Medina County 6 Urban 56.8 (52.7, 61.2) 74 (50, 83) 147 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Marion County 6 Rural 86.9 (78.4, 96.3) 13 (1, 29) 78 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 56.3 (52.8, 60.0) 76 (55, 84) 203 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Madison County 6 Urban 71.1 (61.4, 81.9) 35 (10, 74) 40 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Lucas County 6 Urban 65.0 (62.0, 68.2) 50 (34, 64) 362 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.0, -0.8)
Lorain County 6 Urban 61.6 (58.3, 65.0) 60 (41, 74) 273 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Logan County 6 Rural 63.1 (54.7, 72.6) 55 (23, 83) 42 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Licking County 6 Urban 73.1 (68.1, 78.3) 29 (16, 49) 169 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 97.1 (87.9, 107.2) 3 (1, 18) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Lake County 6 Urban 63.8 (60.1, 67.8) 52 (33, 72) 226 falling falling trend -1.9 (-5.9, -1.1)
Knox County 6 Rural 58.3 (51.2, 66.2) 69 (35, 86) 51 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 74.5 (67.1, 82.6) 28 (11, 55) 79 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Jackson County 6 Rural 89.6 (77.4, 103.4) 6 (1, 35) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Huron County 6 Rural 62.1 (54.5, 70.6) 57 (27, 84) 50 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 6.6)
Holmes County 6 Rural 40.7 (32.8, 49.8) 88 (75, 88) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.9)
Hocking County 6 Urban 89.4 (76.9, 103.6) 8 (1, 40) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Highland County 6 Rural 87.8 (77.5, 99.3) 12 (1, 33) 54 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Henry County 6 Rural 67.8 (56.5, 81.0) 39 (10, 83) 27 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.1)
Harrison County 6 Rural 75.1 (59.7, 93.9) 27 (2, 82) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.6)
Hardin County 6 Rural 83.9 (71.2, 98.4) 17 (1, 50) 32 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.3)
Hancock County 6 Rural 52.6 (46.4, 59.5) 80 (50, 88) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 65.7 (63.4, 68.1) 44 (35, 59) 661 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 89.5 (78.6, 101.5) 7 (1, 33) 52 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.1)
Greene County 6 Urban 55.6 (51.1, 60.3) 77 (54, 85) 123 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Geauga County 6 Urban 47.1 (42.2, 52.5) 86 (74, 88) 70 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Gallia County 6 Rural 86.5 (74.3, 100.4) 14 (1, 41) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Fulton County 6 Urban 51.7 (43.6, 60.9) 82 (43, 88) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.8)
Franklin County 6 Urban 60.0 (58.1, 61.9) 63 (51, 74) 780 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Fayette County 6 Rural 78.7 (66.5, 92.7) 21 (2, 67) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.9)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 58.5 (53.8, 63.6) 67 (42, 83) 118 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -2.7)
Erie County 6 Urban 59.3 (53.3, 65.9) 66 (34, 84) 75 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Delaware County 6 Urban 45.4 (41.5, 49.6) 87 (79, 88) 104 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.8, -2.6)
Defiance County 6 Rural 72.6 (62.6, 84.0) 31 (8, 77) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Darke County 6 Rural 57.2 (49.8, 65.6) 73 (35, 87) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 61.7 (60.0, 63.4) 58 (47, 70) 1,098 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -1.1)
Crawford County 6 Rural 78.6 (68.9, 89.5) 22 (3, 58) 50 stable stable trend -9.7 (-23.7, 3.0)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 75.6 (65.3, 87.1) 26 (5, 67) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 65.3 (59.7, 71.4) 47 (27, 75) 106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Clinton County 6 Rural 84.3 (73.8, 96.0) 16 (1, 43) 48 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Clermont County 6 Urban 70.5 (66.1, 75.3) 36 (21, 55) 195 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
Clark County 6 Urban 77.8 (72.3, 83.6) 24 (10, 40) 156 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Champaign County 6 Rural 66.5 (57.1, 77.1) 42 (15, 83) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Carroll County 6 Urban 72.2 (60.8, 85.4) 32 (6, 76) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Butler County 6 Urban 66.7 (63.3, 70.2) 40 (30, 61) 308 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Brown County 6 Urban 82.3 (72.4, 93.3) 18 (2, 45) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Belmont County 6 Urban 72.1 (64.7, 80.2) 33 (14, 62) 74 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 58.2 (50.1, 67.4) 70 (31, 87) 38 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Athens County 6 Rural 73.0 (63.8, 83.2) 30 (7, 71) 49 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 70.1 (64.1, 76.7) 37 (18, 63) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Ashland County 6 Rural 58.1 (50.6, 66.5) 71 (33, 87) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Allen County 6 Urban 63.8 (57.8, 70.2) 53 (29, 78) 89 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.8, 2.0)
Adams County 6 Rural 89.7 (76.9, 104.4) 5 (1, 41) 36 stable stable trend -11.1 (-27.0, 3.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/05/2024 4:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top