Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 *** 24.8 (24.4, 25.1) N/A 3,403 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.7, 8.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 22.6 (22.5, 22.7) N/A 83,620 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.9)
Adams County 6 *** 29.3 (21.4, 39.4) 22 (1, 82) 10 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.4, 9.4)
Allen County 6 *** 19.9 (16.5, 23.8) 76 (40, 87) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.6)
Ashland County 6 *** 25.3 (19.9, 31.8) 46 (3, 82) 17 rising rising trend 6.0 (1.8, 10.3)
Ashtabula County 6 *** 22.3 (18.6, 26.5) 62 (28, 84) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Athens County 6 *** 26.7 (21.1, 33.4) 41 (2, 81) 16 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.0, 7.3)
Auglaize County 6 *** 32.3 (25.8, 40.0) 7 (1, 66) 18 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.0, 4.9)
Belmont County 6 *** 22.6 (18.2, 27.8) 61 (19, 85) 20 rising rising trend 23.4 (6.9, 42.4)
Brown County 6 *** 27.4 (21.3, 34.7) 36 (1, 80) 15 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.1, 6.2)
Butler County 6 *** 20.8 (18.8, 22.9) 69 (51, 82) 85 stable stable trend -5.0 (-12.1, 2.6)
Carroll County 6 *** 17.9 (12.0, 25.9) 82 (17, 88) 7 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.8, -0.7)
Champaign County 6 *** 31.8 (24.7, 40.4) 10 (1, 71) 15 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.3, 6.8)
Clark County 6 *** 27.4 (23.7, 31.5) 37 (7, 66) 44 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.1, 5.3)
Clermont County 6 *** 28.0 (25.0, 31.3) 31 (7, 60) 66 stable stable trend -6.8 (-15.3, 2.5)
Clinton County 6 *** 27.8 (21.5, 35.4) 34 (1, 80) 14 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 5.7)
Columbiana County 6 *** 21.9 (18.4, 25.9) 64 (31, 84) 30 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.7, 4.2)
Coshocton County 6 *** 28.3 (21.5, 36.5) 26 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-41.8, 64.7)
Crawford County 6 *** 16.2 (11.5, 22.4) 84 (42, 88) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.7)
Cuyahoga County 6 *** 20.0 (19.0, 21.1) 74 (61, 82) 313 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.3, 9.9)
Darke County 6 *** 33.4 (27.0, 40.9) 3 (1, 55) 21 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.6, 9.9)
Defiance County 6 *** 14.4 (9.7, 20.7) 88 (54, 88) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.7)
Delaware County 6 *** 28.2 (24.9, 31.7) 29 (7, 60) 57 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.6)
Erie County 6 *** 33.1 (28.0, 38.8) 5 (1, 53) 35 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 4.7)
Fairfield County 6 *** 24.2 (21.0, 27.8) 54 (18, 78) 42 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.9)
Fayette County 6 *** 30.0 (22.1, 40.0) 20 (1, 82) 10 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.8, 8.3)
Franklin County 6 *** 20.2 (19.1, 21.4) 72 (59, 81) 254 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Fulton County 6 *** 20.1 (14.6, 27.1) 73 (14, 88) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.4)
Gallia County 6 *** 23.4 (16.5, 32.3) 58 (2, 88) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.9, 6.2)
Geauga County 6 *** 34.7 (29.9, 40.1) 2 (1, 36) 43 rising rising trend 21.5 (3.7, 42.4)
Greene County 6 *** 28.2 (24.8, 32.0) 28 (5, 60) 54 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.3)
Guernsey County 6 *** 16.9 (11.9, 23.4) 83 (37, 88) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.5, 2.6)
Hamilton County 6 *** 24.3 (22.9, 25.9) 53 (35, 66) 222 rising rising trend 3.4 (2.2, 4.5)
Hancock County 6 *** 26.4 (21.7, 31.9) 42 (5, 76) 24 stable stable trend -19.1 (-39.2, 7.7)
Hardin County 6 *** 19.5 (13.2, 27.9) 77 (9, 88) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 2.7)
Harrison County 6 *** 20.0 (11.6, 32.4) 75 (2, 88) 4
*
*
Henry County 6 *** 21.5 (14.8, 30.4) 67 (5, 88) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.9)
Highland County 6 *** 23.4 (17.7, 30.5) 57 (6, 86) 12 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.5, 8.5)
Hocking County 6 *** 26.1 (18.8, 35.4) 44 (1, 86) 9 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.0)
Holmes County 6 *** 24.7 (18.5, 32.3) 51 (3, 85) 11 stable stable trend 4.9 (-0.1, 10.1)
Huron County 6 *** 28.5 (23.0, 35.1) 25 (1, 74) 19 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.4, 7.7)
Jackson County 6 *** 24.6 (17.9, 33.0) 52 (2, 86) 9
*
*
Jefferson County 6 *** 22.2 (17.6, 27.7) 63 (17, 86) 19 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.7, 9.1)
Knox County 6 *** 28.2 (22.9, 34.5) 27 (2, 74) 21 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 5.9)
Lake County 6 *** 30.9 (28.0, 34.1) 13 (2, 43) 92 rising rising trend 9.0 (5.9, 12.2)
Lawrence County 6 *** 26.3 (21.1, 32.3) 43 (4, 79) 19 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.5, 5.9)
Licking County 6 *** 30.7 (27.3, 34.5) 15 (2, 51) 61 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.1)
Logan County 6 *** 29.4 (23.1, 37.0) 21 (1, 76) 16 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.3, 8.4)
Lorain County 6 *** 25.1 (22.8, 27.5) 50 (23, 67) 96 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.4, 3.7)
Lucas County 6 *** 21.1 (19.3, 23.0) 68 (51, 81) 107 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.6)
Madison County 6 *** 30.1 (23.5, 38.0) 19 (1, 77) 15 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 6.6)
Mahoning County 6 *** 19.1 (16.8, 21.6) 78 (58, 86) 59 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.3, 5.9)
Marion County 6 *** 20.6 (16.2, 25.8) 70 (27, 87) 16 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.9, -0.7)
Medina County 6 *** 31.2 (27.9, 34.9) 12 (2, 43) 67 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.7, 3.7)
Meigs County 6 *** 18.3 (11.8, 27.3) 80 (15, 88) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.2, 8.0)
Mercer County 6 *** 31.3 (24.2, 39.8) 11 (1, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.1)
Miami County 6 *** 37.3 (32.5, 42.6) 1 (1, 22) 47 rising rising trend 5.7 (3.2, 8.2)
Monroe County 6 *** 29.0 (19.1, 42.9) 23 (1, 87) 6 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.3, 11.8)
Montgomery County 6 *** 27.3 (25.5, 29.3) 38 (17, 54) 177 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.0, 5.9)
Morgan County 6 *** 18.1 (10.8, 29.1) 81 (10, 88) 4
*
*
Morrow County 6 *** 25.1 (18.4, 33.6) 49 (1, 85) 10 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.1)
Muskingum County 6 *** 32.2 (27.3, 37.8) 8 (1, 55) 33 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 4.6)
Noble County 6 *** 15.9 (8.5, 27.9) 85 (9, 88) 4
*
*
Ottawa County 6 *** 30.6 (24.2, 38.4) 16 (1, 73) 19 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.5)
Paulding County 6 *** 21.8 (13.6, 33.4) 65 (1, 88) 5
*
*
Perry County 6 *** 23.6 (17.4, 31.4) 56 (3, 87) 10
*
*
Pickaway County 6 *** 25.2 (20.0, 31.4) 48 (5, 83) 17 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.5, 6.7)
Pike County 6 *** 28.6 (20.7, 38.6) 24 (1, 83) 9 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.2, 7.5)
Portage County 6 *** 27.3 (23.9, 31.0) 39 (8, 65) 51 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.5, 5.3)
Preble County 6 *** 30.5 (24.0, 38.3) 17 (1, 70) 16 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.7, 8.3)
Putnam County 6 *** 32.4 (24.5, 42.0) 6 (1, 73) 12 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.1, 8.4)
Richland County 6 *** 21.8 (18.4, 25.6) 66 (33, 83) 33 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.2, 4.9)
Ross County 6 *** 30.8 (25.9, 36.5) 14 (1, 59) 29 rising rising trend 6.9 (3.8, 10.1)
Sandusky County 6 *** 28.2 (22.8, 34.4) 30 (2, 78) 21 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.1, 8.8)
Scioto County 6 *** 22.7 (18.4, 27.6) 60 (16, 85) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.9)
Seneca County 6 *** 23.7 (18.6, 29.9) 55 (9, 84) 16 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 6.2)
Shelby County 6 *** 27.6 (21.6, 34.9) 35 (1, 81) 15 rising rising trend 5.2 (1.1, 9.4)
Stark County 6 *** 26.9 (24.7, 29.2) 40 (16, 58) 127 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Summit County 6 *** 25.3 (23.5, 27.2) 47 (26, 63) 165 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.0)
Trumbull County 6 *** 25.9 (23.1, 28.9) 45 (16, 66) 71 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.7, 6.7)
Tuscarawas County 6 *** 27.9 (23.6, 32.9) 33 (3, 69) 32 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.8, 8.1)
Union County 6 *** 27.9 (22.0, 35.0) 32 (1, 79) 16 falling falling trend -8.8 (-14.1, -3.2)
Van Wert County 6 *** 14.7 (9.5, 21.9) 87 (43, 88) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.1, 5.9)
Vinton County 6 *** 20.3 (11.4, 33.7) 71 (1, 88) 3
*
*
Warren County 6 *** 33.2 (30.0, 36.6) 4 (1, 30) 83 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.1, 4.9)
Washington County 6 *** 23.3 (18.6, 29.0) 59 (11, 85) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.9)
Wayne County 6 *** 30.3 (26.2, 35.0) 18 (1, 58) 41 rising rising trend 6.9 (5.5, 8.4)
Williams County 6 *** 18.4 (13.0, 25.4) 79 (27, 88) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.6)
Wood County 6 *** 32.1 (27.9, 36.8) 9 (1, 47) 45 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.0, 5.3)
Wyandot County 6 *** 15.8 (9.8, 24.4) 86 (28, 88) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.0, 6.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/21/2022 5:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top