Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6 N/A 118.1 (117.0, 119.3) N/A 9,032 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.4, 8.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Washington County 6 Rural 160.0 (144.1, 177.6) 1 (1, 9) 77 rising rising trend 17.7 (5.6, 35.3)
Delaware County 6 Urban 150.1 (140.2, 160.5) 2 (1, 9) 184 stable stable trend 2.4 (-3.1, 12.2)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 145.9 (135.1, 157.3) 3 (1, 13) 142 stable stable trend 3.8 (-8.1, 15.7)
Cuyahoga County 6 Urban 139.3 (135.6, 143.0) 4 (2, 11) 1,151 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 7.9)
Medina County 6 Urban 136.4 (127.4, 146.1) 5 (2, 25) 176 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3)
Knox County 6 Rural 135.1 (119.7, 152.2) 6 (1, 41) 58 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Allen County 6 Urban 132.5 (120.2, 145.8) 7 (2, 41) 90 stable stable trend -7.1 (-15.4, 3.4)
Franklin County 6 Urban 131.7 (127.6, 135.9) 8 (5, 21) 842 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Defiance County 6 Rural 127.3 (108.5, 148.8) 9 (1, 67) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 2.0)
Lucas County 6 Urban 126.9 (120.7, 133.3) 10 (5, 32) 340 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.6, 11.8)
Putnam County 6 Rural 126.2 (105.9, 149.6) 11 (1, 71) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Van Wert County 6 Rural 125.8 (104.0, 151.1) 12 (1, 77) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.9)
Wood County 6 Urban 125.3 (113.9, 137.5) 13 (3, 49) 95 stable stable trend 6.0 (-0.7, 18.7)
Mahoning County 6 Urban 125.0 (117.4, 133.0) 14 (6, 39) 214 rising rising trend 7.3 (0.5, 16.9)
Hamilton County 6 Urban 124.7 (120.2, 129.4) 15 (7, 33) 610 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 8.2)
Lorain County 6 Urban 124.7 (117.9, 131.7) 16 (6, 37) 271 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.1, 9.6)
Athens County 6 Rural 124.5 (107.3, 143.8) 17 (2, 69) 41 rising rising trend 9.8 (1.6, 22.2)
Muskingum County 6 Rural 124.3 (111.4, 138.5) 18 (3, 56) 71 stable stable trend -5.5 (-12.6, 1.9)
Paulding County 6 Rural 123.2 (98.0, 153.8) 19 (1, 82) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.2, 3.8)
Union County 6 Urban 123.2 (106.4, 141.9) 20 (2, 69) 42 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 7.2)
Madison County 6 Urban 123.1 (104.9, 143.7) 21 (1, 73) 35 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.7)
Richland County 6 Urban 122.9 (112.4, 134.1) 22 (5, 52) 106 rising rising trend 6.9 (1.4, 16.0)
Warren County 6 Urban 121.9 (113.8, 130.5) 23 (7, 47) 177 stable stable trend 5.1 (-2.4, 15.9)
Licking County 6 Urban 121.4 (112.3, 131.1) 24 (6, 51) 140 stable stable trend 4.1 (-2.0, 16.3)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 120.7 (105.1, 138.6) 25 (3, 71) 46 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Ashland County 6 Rural 120.4 (104.8, 138.0) 26 (3, 72) 44 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.8, 15.8)
Carroll County 6 Urban 119.6 (99.6, 143.2) 27 (1, 79) 27 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.3, 1.3)
Sandusky County 6 Rural 119.2 (104.6, 135.5) 28 (3, 68) 51 stable stable trend 6.0 (-0.9, 20.6)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 118.3 (105.0, 133.1) 29 (4, 70) 61 stable stable trend 5.8 (-3.8, 23.7)
Tuscarawas County 6 Rural 117.5 (105.9, 130.2) 30 (6, 64) 78 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Fulton County 6 Urban 117.3 (100.0, 137.0) 31 (2, 77) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.1)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 116.8 (111.6, 122.1) 32 (16, 48) 402 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.1, 11.4)
Champaign County 6 Rural 116.0 (98.2, 136.4) 33 (3, 80) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Mercer County 6 Rural 114.9 (97.7, 134.5) 34 (4, 78) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Lake County 6 Urban 114.2 (106.9, 121.8) 35 (14, 58) 195 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.2, 13.8)
Clinton County 6 Rural 113.8 (96.0, 134.1) 36 (3, 78) 31 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.7)
Geauga County 6 Urban 111.7 (101.0, 123.3) 37 (10, 72) 85 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.2, 9.9)
Greene County 6 Urban 110.9 (102.1, 120.4) 38 (15, 69) 122 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Meigs County 6 Rural 110.3 (88.8, 136.3) 39 (2, 85) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.8)
Preble County 6 Rural 109.8 (93.0, 129.1) 40 (4, 81) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Miami County 6 Urban 109.7 (99.1, 121.2) 41 (12, 74) 82 stable stable trend 8.1 (-1.1, 20.1)
Summit County 6 Urban 109.6 (104.7, 114.7) 42 (29, 61) 400 stable stable trend 7.0 (-1.4, 13.3)
Perry County 6 Urban 108.8 (90.4, 130.3) 43 (4, 83) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.1)
Clark County 6 Urban 107.9 (98.7, 117.9) 44 (17, 74) 104 stable stable trend 7.7 (-2.0, 27.3)
Monroe County 6 Rural 107.8 (82.4, 140.2) 45 (2, 88) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Morrow County 6 Urban 107.8 (90.1, 128.3) 46 (4, 82) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.5)
Auglaize County 6 Rural 107.2 (91.2, 125.5) 47 (7, 82) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.7)
Gallia County 6 Rural 107.0 (87.4, 130.2) 48 (4, 85) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.2)
Belmont County 6 Urban 106.3 (93.6, 120.4) 49 (14, 79) 54 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -1.2)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 105.5 (91.6, 121.1) 50 (12, 81) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.1)
Ross County 6 Rural 105.4 (92.9, 119.3) 51 (15, 80) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.9)
Stark County 6 Urban 105.3 (99.7, 111.1) 52 (33, 70) 280 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -2.1)
Highland County 6 Rural 105.0 (88.9, 123.5) 53 (7, 84) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.5)
Fayette County 6 Rural 104.9 (84.7, 129.0) 54 (5, 86) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.6)
Wayne County 6 Rural 104.5 (94.5, 115.4) 55 (23, 78) 83 stable stable trend 11.6 (-0.6, 20.4)
Seneca County 6 Rural 104.5 (90.2, 120.7) 56 (10, 82) 41 stable stable trend 7.3 (-2.6, 22.0)
Williams County 6 Rural 104.3 (86.9, 124.5) 57 (8, 85) 27 rising rising trend 14.0 (5.4, 31.0)
Erie County 6 Urban 103.7 (92.4, 116.1) 58 (20, 80) 65 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.4, 11.1)
Huron County 6 Rural 103.4 (89.2, 119.4) 59 (13, 82) 40 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Guernsey County 6 Rural 103.3 (87.1, 121.9) 60 (10, 85) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.0)
Portage County 6 Urban 101.5 (93.0, 110.6) 61 (30, 78) 113 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Ashtabula County 6 Urban 100.5 (90.2, 111.8) 62 (28, 81) 73 stable stable trend 5.6 (-4.3, 22.2)
Columbiana County 6 Rural 100.4 (90.5, 111.2) 63 (29, 80) 80 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.3)
Marion County 6 Rural 100.0 (87.0, 114.5) 64 (20, 84) 45 rising rising trend 8.8 (1.6, 25.2)
Crawford County 6 Rural 99.9 (84.8, 117.4) 65 (15, 85) 32 rising rising trend 12.1 (0.9, 29.1)
Morgan County 6 Rural 99.5 (75.1, 131.1) 66 (3, 88) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.5)
Pickaway County 6 Urban 99.3 (85.1, 115.2) 67 (20, 85) 37 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.1, 13.9)
Butler County 6 Urban 99.2 (93.4, 105.4) 68 (44, 78) 229 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.3, 11.7)
Hocking County 6 Urban 98.4 (80.4, 120.0) 69 (9, 87) 22 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.8)
Trumbull County 6 Urban 98.3 (91.3, 105.7) 70 (39, 79) 154 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.8, -2.5)
Clermont County 6 Urban 95.2 (87.7, 103.2) 71 (46, 82) 129 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.4, 13.7)
Henry County 6 Rural 95.0 (76.0, 117.9) 72 (12, 88) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.1)
Scioto County 6 Rural 92.7 (80.9, 106.0) 73 (34, 86) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 6.5)
Adams County 6 Rural 91.5 (72.7, 114.2) 74 (17, 88) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.0)
Harrison County 6 Rural 90.9 (67.7, 121.0) 75 (8, 88) 11 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.1)
Brown County 6 Urban 89.9 (75.3, 106.9) 76 (36, 88) 28 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.4, -2.2)
Logan County 6 Rural 89.9 (75.8, 106.1) 77 (35, 88) 31 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 13.7)
Coshocton County 6 Rural 89.1 (73.5, 107.5) 78 (29, 88) 24 stable stable trend -2.4 (-10.3, 2.1)
Hardin County 6 Rural 86.3 (68.1, 108.2) 79 (25, 88) 16 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.3, 0.5)
Pike County 6 Rural 86.1 (67.5, 108.7) 80 (24, 88) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.3)
Shelby County 6 Rural 85.6 (71.2, 102.1) 81 (38, 88) 27 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.8)
Jackson County 6 Rural 84.2 (66.5, 105.3) 82 (30, 88) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.4)
Hancock County 6 Rural 80.3 (69.3, 92.8) 83 (61, 88) 40 stable stable trend -2.8 (-14.0, 8.3)
Vinton County 6 Rural 78.8 (55.7, 110.0) 84 (22, 88) 8 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.4, 0.7)
Darke County 6 Rural 75.6 (63.5, 89.7) 85 (64, 88) 28 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -2.2)
Holmes County 6 Rural 73.4 (58.0, 91.8) 86 (56, 88) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.6)
Wyandot County 6 Rural 73.0 (55.4, 95.3) 87 (49, 88) 12 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.8, -1.6)
Noble County 6 Rural 68.2 (51.2, 91.9) 88 (62, 88) 13 stable stable trend 10.6 (-2.3, 40.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/12/2024 3:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top