Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Breast, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6,10 *** 126.2 (125.1, 127.4) 9,183 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 124.7 (124.4, 124.9) 234,445 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Cuyahoga County 6,10 *** 131.8 (128.2, 135.4) 1,128 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Franklin County 6,10 *** 132.3 (128.3, 136.5) 830 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.7)
Hamilton County 6,10 *** 137.7 (133.0, 142.6) 675 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.3)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 131.8 (126.3, 137.4) 467 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.6, 4.6)
Summit County 6,10 *** 127.3 (121.9, 132.9) 453 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.6, 8.6)
Lucas County 6,10 *** 125.6 (119.5, 132.0) 335 stable stable trend -3.4 (-12.2, 6.2)
Stark County 6,10 *** 119.0 (112.8, 125.4) 303 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.0, 9.1)
Butler County 6,10 *** 125.4 (118.6, 132.5) 267 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.9, 7.1)
Lorain County 6,10 *** 128.7 (121.4, 136.3) 252 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.3, 3.9)
Lake County 6,10 *** 138.7 (130.3, 147.6) 220 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.2)
Mahoning County 6,10 *** 120.9 (113.2, 129.0) 208 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.4)
Warren County 6,10 *** 139.6 (130.4, 149.3) 176 stable stable trend -2.6 (-14.0, 10.4)
Trumbull County 6,10 *** 116.3 (108.2, 124.9) 173 stable stable trend -1.0 (-9.0, 7.7)
Clermont County 6,10 *** 135.5 (126.1, 145.4) 163 stable stable trend -2.5 (-14.3, 10.8)
Medina County 6,10 *** 131.2 (121.6, 141.5) 144 stable stable trend 1.4 (-8.0, 11.7)
Delaware County 6,10 *** 133.2 (123.1, 143.8) 135 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.7, 3.2)
Licking County 6,10 *** 127.6 (117.9, 138.0) 134 stable stable trend 10.1 (-14.7, 42.0)
Clark County 6,10 *** 141.9 (130.7, 153.9) 130 stable stable trend 6.3 (-5.4, 19.4)
Greene County 6,10 *** 125.9 (116.1, 136.4) 130 stable stable trend -4.4 (-14.2, 6.4)
Portage County 6,10 *** 124.7 (114.5, 135.5) 118 stable stable trend 0.7 (-7.4, 9.5)
Fairfield County 6,10 *** 126.0 (115.6, 137.2) 112 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.2, 6.6)
Richland County 6,10 *** 120.8 (109.9, 132.6) 100 stable stable trend 1.3 (-16.1, 22.4)
Wood County 6,10 *** 126.8 (115.0, 139.5) 91 stable stable trend -5.0 (-15.9, 7.4)
Miami County 6,10 *** 128.2 (116.0, 141.4) 86 stable stable trend 1.7 (-10.1, 15.0)
Wayne County 6,10 *** 118.5 (107.0, 130.9) 84 stable stable trend 7.2 (-7.2, 23.8)
Geauga County 6,10 *** 130.5 (117.7, 144.5) 83 stable stable trend 3.9 (-7.7, 16.9)
Ashtabula County 6,10 *** 121.2 (109.1, 134.2) 80 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.9, 6.1)
Columbiana County 6,10 *** 110.5 (99.2, 122.7) 79 stable stable trend -1.3 (-14.0, 13.3)
Allen County 6,10 *** 113.0 (101.2, 125.8) 73 stable stable trend -2.6 (-14.2, 10.6)
Erie County 6,10 *** 133.3 (119.1, 148.8) 72 stable stable trend -1.3 (-27.0, 33.5)
Tuscarawas County 6,10 *** 109.4 (97.9, 122.1) 71 stable stable trend 5.7 (-4.9, 17.4)
Muskingum County 6,10 *** 120.9 (108.0, 135.0) 68 stable stable trend 5.5 (-18.4, 36.4)
Scioto County 6,10 *** 125.5 (111.6, 140.7) 64 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.0, -1.9)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 123.5 (109.1, 139.5) 60 stable stable trend 5.5 (0.0, 11.3)
Washington County 6,10 *** 130.5 (115.0, 147.8) 57 stable stable trend 11.9 (-0.1, 25.3)
Ross County 6,10 *** 117.6 (103.9, 132.7) 56 stable stable trend 6.2 (-1.8, 14.9)
Hancock County 6,10 *** 109.8 (96.3, 124.7) 51 stable stable trend -4.8 (-18.7, 11.4)
Sandusky County 6,10 *** 125.1 (109.6, 142.3) 51 rising rising trend 7.2 (0.4, 14.4)
Knox County 6,10 *** 131.7 (115.3, 149.7) 51 falling falling trend -9.2 (-13.5, -4.6)
Belmont County 6,10 *** 101.2 (88.4, 115.5) 50 stable stable trend 5.8 (-29.3, 58.2)
Lawrence County 6,10 *** 115.9 (101.1, 132.4) 47 stable stable trend 9.2 (-11.3, 34.3)
Marion County 6,10 *** 116.0 (100.9, 132.8) 46 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.6, 5.7)
Pickaway County 6,10 *** 132.2 (115.0, 151.4) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-8.8, 9.2)
Ottawa County 6,10 *** 130.9 (113.1, 151.1) 44 stable stable trend -4.7 (-13.5, 5.0)
Huron County 6,10 *** 123.2 (106.7, 141.5) 43 stable stable trend 10.3 (-13.3, 40.3)
Seneca County 6,10 *** 120.2 (103.7, 138.7) 42 stable stable trend 7.4 (-7.7, 24.9)
Auglaize County 6,10 *** 139.0 (119.8, 160.6) 40 stable stable trend -4.2 (-11.9, 4.1)
Darke County 6,10 *** 114.5 (98.5, 132.5) 40 stable stable trend -5.9 (-12.5, 1.1)
Ashland County 6,10 *** 114.1 (98.2, 131.9) 40 stable stable trend -4.6 (-24.3, 20.1)
Union County 6,10 *** 129.2 (110.9, 149.7) 37 stable stable trend 3.0 (-10.1, 17.9)
Crawford County 6,10 *** 121.7 (103.8, 141.9) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-11.8, 12.6)
Athens County 6,10 *** 120.7 (103.3, 140.3) 36 stable stable trend -2.6 (-21.9, 21.5)
Logan County 6,10 *** 119.2 (101.9, 138.8) 36 stable stable trend -4.0 (-28.1, 28.3)
Champaign County 6,10 *** 121.3 (102.4, 142.8) 31 stable stable trend 5.1 (-9.1, 21.4)
Clinton County 6,10 *** 119.6 (101.1, 140.7) 31 stable stable trend 4.6 (-22.7, 41.5)
Highland County 6,10 *** 113.3 (95.4, 133.7) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-12.1, 13.3)
Brown County 6,10 *** 107.4 (90.5, 126.8) 30 stable stable trend 2.6 (-11.9, 19.4)
Fulton County 6,10 *** 110.5 (92.9, 130.6) 30 stable stable trend 4.1 (-10.9, 21.6)
Preble County 6,10 *** 105.2 (88.3, 124.6) 29 stable stable trend 1.1 (-23.6, 33.7)
Williams County 6,10 *** 115.1 (96.6, 136.4) 29 stable stable trend 7.3 (-12.2, 31.1)
Defiance County 6,10 *** 115.5 (96.5, 137.4) 28 stable stable trend 0.0 (-12.3, 14.2)
Putnam County 6,10 *** 130.9 (109.4, 155.6) 28 stable stable trend 7.0 (-2.4, 17.3)
Morrow County 6,10 *** 124.4 (104.1, 147.8) 28 stable stable trend 10.3 (-11.3, 37.3)
Mercer County 6,10 *** 105.6 (88.0, 125.9) 28 stable stable trend -5.9 (-15.9, 5.4)
Coshocton County 6,10 *** 112.4 (93.7, 133.9) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-21.9, 28.7)
Shelby County 6,10 *** 91.5 (76.4, 108.8) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-26.2, 38.2)
Perry County 6,10 *** 117.3 (97.3, 140.4) 25 stable stable trend -3.2 (-25.0, 24.8)
Pike County 6,10 *** 134.1 (110.7, 161.2) 24 stable stable trend 2.8 (-12.5, 20.9)
Van Wert County 6,10 *** 126.5 (103.9, 152.8) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-12.7, 12.5)
Madison County 6,10 *** 95.6 (78.8, 115.0) 24 falling falling trend -7.9 (-15.2, -0.1)
Guernsey County 6,10 *** 82.8 (67.9, 100.3) 23 stable stable trend -5.1 (-14.5, 5.4)
Fayette County 6,10 *** 120.8 (99.0, 146.3) 23 stable stable trend 4.0 (-19.6, 34.5)
Hocking County 6,10 *** 116.4 (95.0, 141.4) 22 stable stable trend 3.7 (-25.9, 45.2)
Henry County 6,10 *** 112.8 (92.0, 137.2) 22 stable stable trend 5.5 (-9.7, 23.4)
Hardin County 6,10 *** 116.4 (94.5, 142.0) 21 rising rising trend 12.9 (4.3, 22.3)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 97.1 (78.7, 118.7) 20 stable stable trend 2.3 (-20.7, 31.9)
Adams County 6,10 *** 110.9 (89.3, 136.3) 19 stable stable trend -5.5 (-18.5, 9.6)
Meigs County 6,10 *** 122.3 (98.3, 150.9) 19 stable stable trend 12.6 (-6.2, 35.2)
Carroll County 6,10 *** 93.6 (74.4, 116.7) 18 rising rising trend 16.9 (7.7, 26.9)
Wyandot County 6,10 *** 120.3 (95.3, 150.0) 18 stable stable trend -11.9 (-24.3, 2.7)
Gallia County 6,10 *** 79.3 (62.3, 99.8) 16 rising rising trend 13.5 (10.7, 16.4)
Holmes County 6,10 *** 71.4 (56.4, 89.2) 16 stable stable trend 8.1 (-13.8, 35.6)
Paulding County 6,10 *** 108.6 (82.1, 141.1) 12 stable stable trend 9.3 (-20.6, 50.6)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 109.9 (81.6, 145.6) 11 stable stable trend -6.2 (-31.5, 28.4)
Harrison County 6,10 *** 79.2 (58.4, 106.3) 10 stable stable trend 4.9 (-30.2, 57.7)
Vinton County 6,10 *** 112.5 (82.1, 151.2) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-23.9, 37.8)
Noble County 6,10 *** 100.3 (70.0, 139.9) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-27.8, 47.1)
Monroe County 6,10 *** 78.2 (54.3, 109.9) 8 stable stable trend 10.5 (-26.5, 66.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/25/2018 5:45 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top