Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Ohio by County

Prostate, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Ohio 6,10 *** 108.0 (106.9, 109.1) 7,334 falling falling trend -6.9 (-13.2, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 109.0 (108.8, 109.2) 190,639 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.0, -1.1)
Cuyahoga County 6,10 *** 131.7 (128.0, 135.5) 976 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.8, -0.2)
Knox County 6,10 *** 129.5 (113.4, 147.4) 48 falling falling trend -18.0 (-24.2, -11.3)
Tuscarawas County 6,10 *** 125.8 (113.2, 139.5) 76 falling falling trend -16.0 (-25.2, -5.8)
Mercer County 6,10 *** 125.2 (106.4, 146.5) 33 stable stable trend 3.5 (-11.6, 21.2)
Medina County 6,10 *** 124.5 (115.0, 134.7) 135 stable stable trend -4.3 (-17.5, 10.9)
Franklin County 6,10 *** 123.1 (118.7, 127.6) 654 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.4, 5.5)
Lorain County 6,10 *** 122.6 (115.4, 130.2) 228 stable stable trend -8.3 (-21.7, 7.3)
Defiance County 6,10 *** 122.2 (103.0, 144.2) 30 stable stable trend -14.4 (-30.8, 6.0)
Stark County 6,10 *** 121.8 (115.5, 128.4) 292 stable stable trend -7.8 (-17.9, 3.6)
Delaware County 6,10 *** 120.9 (110.7, 131.7) 114 stable stable trend 8.2 (0.0, 16.9)
Hamilton County 6,10 *** 119.7 (115.0, 124.6) 509 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.2, -3.3)
Lucas County 6,10 *** 117.9 (111.6, 124.3) 287 falling falling trend -11.9 (-20.6, -2.2)
Fulton County 6,10 *** 117.5 (99.3, 138.3) 31 stable stable trend -12.6 (-26.9, 4.4)
Fairfield County 6,10 *** 115.1 (104.9, 126.0) 98 stable stable trend -2.6 (-16.8, 14.0)
Portage County 6,10 *** 113.1 (103.4, 123.6) 105 falling falling trend -8.0 (-13.2, -2.5)
Wood County 6,10 *** 113.0 (101.8, 125.2) 78 stable stable trend -15.1 (-33.5, 8.3)
Summit County 6,10 *** 111.8 (106.6, 117.2) 367 stable stable trend -10.1 (-20.4, 1.5)
Putnam County 6,10 *** 111.8 (92.0, 134.7) 23 stable stable trend -4.9 (-26.6, 23.2)
Gallia County 6,10 *** 111.4 (91.3, 134.9) 22 stable stable trend 14.5 (-10.3, 46.1)
Harrison County 6,10 *** 110.5 (85.0, 142.5) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-19.7, 29.7)
Henry County 6,10 *** 107.2 (86.4, 131.9) 19 stable stable trend -9.8 (-35.0, 25.2)
Butler County 6,10 *** 105.8 (99.3, 112.8) 206 falling falling trend -10.6 (-19.2, -1.1)
Union County 6,10 *** 105.7 (88.1, 125.9) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-9.5, 9.8)
Warren County 6,10 *** 104.0 (95.6, 112.9) 120 stable stable trend -4.2 (-18.7, 12.9)
Auglaize County 6,10 *** 103.6 (87.3, 122.2) 29 stable stable trend 8.5 (-16.8, 41.5)
Trumbull County 6,10 *** 103.6 (96.1, 111.5) 148 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.4, 1.4)
Allen County 6,10 *** 103.2 (92.1, 115.4) 66 stable stable trend 3.9 (-13.1, 24.2)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 103.2 (98.2, 108.4) 328 stable stable trend -4.1 (-12.5, 5.2)
Carroll County 6,10 *** 102.8 (83.9, 125.3) 22 stable stable trend -13.4 (-34.9, 15.1)
Hancock County 6,10 *** 101.5 (88.6, 115.9) 46 stable stable trend -10.6 (-26.9, 9.5)
Athens County 6,10 *** 101.5 (85.2, 120.1) 30 falling falling trend -16.8 (-25.9, -6.6)
Belmont County 6,10 *** 101.3 (88.6, 115.5) 48 stable stable trend -13.2 (-34.1, 14.2)
Ottawa County 6,10 *** 101.0 (86.3, 118.1) 35 stable stable trend -8.1 (-24.2, 11.5)
Lake County 6,10 *** 100.9 (93.7, 108.6) 151 falling falling trend -11.1 (-19.4, -2.0)
Paulding County 6,10 *** 100.8 (76.6, 130.9) 12 stable stable trend -12.1 (-38.3, 25.3)
Greene County 6,10 *** 100.4 (91.5, 110.0) 99 falling falling trend -12.0 (-16.1, -7.7)
Geauga County 6,10 *** 99.2 (88.5, 111.1) 66 falling falling trend -9.1 (-16.4, -1.2)
Mahoning County 6,10 *** 98.4 (91.5, 105.9) 155 stable stable trend -4.2 (-16.2, 9.5)
Clermont County 6,10 *** 98.1 (89.8, 106.9) 113 falling falling trend -12.2 (-18.9, -5.0)
Brown County 6,10 *** 97.9 (82.2, 115.9) 29 falling falling trend -14.0 (-20.6, -6.8)
Morrow County 6,10 *** 97.2 (78.8, 118.9) 21 stable stable trend -2.1 (-25.8, 29.3)
Erie County 6,10 *** 97.0 (85.5, 109.7) 54 stable stable trend -11.4 (-25.8, 5.8)
Monroe County 6,10 *** 96.9 (72.6, 128.1) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-25.6, 29.5)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 96.7 (84.4, 110.5) 47 stable stable trend -17.6 (-34.5, 3.7)
Van Wert County 6,10 *** 96.5 (77.2, 119.6) 18 stable stable trend -6.6 (-20.9, 10.4)
Miami County 6,10 *** 95.3 (84.9, 106.6) 64 falling falling trend -14.5 (-23.8, -4.1)
Champaign County 6,10 *** 95.2 (78.4, 114.8) 24 stable stable trend -7.9 (-23.8, 11.3)
Huron County 6,10 *** 94.9 (80.6, 111.1) 33 stable stable trend -12.5 (-32.7, 13.7)
Wyandot County 6,10 *** 94.8 (73.5, 121.0) 14 stable stable trend -14.1 (-29.0, 3.9)
Seneca County 6,10 *** 94.8 (80.5, 111.0) 33 falling falling trend -21.4 (-27.8, -14.3)
Scioto County 6,10 *** 93.9 (81.9, 107.4) 45 stable stable trend -1.9 (-11.6, 8.7)
Wayne County 6,10 *** 93.3 (83.4, 104.1) 67 stable stable trend -2.1 (-12.2, 9.3)
Shelby County 6,10 *** 93.0 (77.3, 111.1) 26 falling falling trend -9.6 (-16.8, -1.7)
Darke County 6,10 *** 92.4 (78.5, 108.2) 32 stable stable trend -15.6 (-40.3, 19.3)
Preble County 6,10 *** 92.1 (76.5, 110.2) 26 stable stable trend -10.4 (-33.2, 20.2)
Richland County 6,10 *** 92.0 (82.6, 102.1) 73 stable stable trend -2.9 (-13.9, 9.6)
Columbiana County 6,10 *** 89.7 (80.1, 100.2) 67 stable stable trend -6.1 (-12.2, 0.4)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 88.5 (70.3, 110.3) 17 stable stable trend -6.4 (-31.7, 28.2)
Washington County 6,10 *** 88.3 (75.9, 102.2) 38 stable stable trend -15.7 (-29.4, 0.7)
Madison County 6,10 *** 88.1 (71.8, 107.1) 22 stable stable trend -4.7 (-15.5, 7.5)
Logan County 6,10 *** 87.6 (72.9, 104.6) 26 stable stable trend 3.9 (-18.4, 32.2)
Guernsey County 6,10 *** 87.0 (71.4, 105.3) 23 stable stable trend 3.4 (-23.4, 39.7)
Licking County 6,10 *** 87.0 (78.9, 95.7) 90 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 5.5)
Meigs County 6,10 *** 86.1 (66.3, 110.6) 14 stable stable trend -4.2 (-21.1, 16.2)
Ashtabula County 6,10 *** 85.4 (75.6, 96.3) 57 stable stable trend -13.5 (-26.8, 2.3)
Sandusky County 6,10 *** 85.4 (72.6, 99.8) 34 stable stable trend -2.9 (-19.5, 17.2)
Clinton County 6,10 *** 84.7 (68.3, 103.9) 20 stable stable trend 11.9 (-14.7, 47.0)
Lawrence County 6,10 *** 84.1 (71.5, 98.4) 33 stable stable trend -10.8 (-28.6, 11.3)
Pickaway County 6,10 *** 83.0 (69.4, 98.5) 28 stable stable trend 8.6 (-4.2, 23.2)
Holmes County 6,10 *** 82.7 (65.7, 102.7) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-21.2, 25.3)
Highland County 6,10 *** 82.5 (67.5, 100.1) 22 stable stable trend 9.2 (-9.2, 31.5)
Perry County 6,10 *** 80.9 (64.2, 100.9) 18 stable stable trend -15.8 (-49.9, 41.5)
Crawford County 6,10 *** 80.9 (66.9, 97.2) 24 falling falling trend -16.9 (-27.5, -4.8)
Clark County 6,10 *** 80.8 (72.6, 89.8) 73 falling falling trend -13.6 (-23.7, -2.1)
Marion County 6,10 *** 79.3 (67.4, 92.8) 33 stable stable trend -15.6 (-39.1, 16.9)
Muskingum County 6,10 *** 78.8 (68.3, 90.5) 42 stable stable trend 6.7 (-20.4, 43.1)
Ashland County 6,10 *** 77.0 (64.5, 91.5) 27 stable stable trend 3.9 (-10.5, 20.6)
Fayette County 6,10 *** 76.7 (59.3, 97.8) 14 stable stable trend 8.7 (-33.6, 78.1)
Pike County 6,10 *** 75.2 (57.9, 96.4) 13 stable stable trend 9.5 (-20.4, 50.6)
Hocking County 6,10 *** 74.5 (58.2, 94.5) 15 stable stable trend -9.4 (-39.3, 35.3)
Adams County 6,10 *** 73.7 (57.0, 94.3) 14 stable stable trend -6.3 (-24.2, 15.7)
Hardin County 6,10 *** 70.3 (53.7, 90.6) 13 stable stable trend -9.9 (-26.5, 10.4)
Vinton County 6,10 *** 69.9 (45.9, 103.0) 6 stable stable trend 10.8 (-7.7, 32.9)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 69.1 (48.5, 96.7) 8 stable stable trend 6.7 (-15.2, 34.3)
Williams County 6,10 *** 68.1 (54.0, 85.0) 17 falling falling trend -12.2 (-22.8, -0.2)
Ross County 6,10 *** 66.0 (55.7, 77.8) 31 stable stable trend 10.6 (-0.7, 23.3)
Coshocton County 6,10 *** 65.9 (52.5, 82.2) 17 stable stable trend 2.6 (-17.3, 27.3)
Noble County 6,10 *** 36.8 (24.7, 55.9) 7 stable stable trend -4.2 (-40.7, 55.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/16/2019 10:22 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top