Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 490.4 (486.2, 494.7) N/A 10,572 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 488.3 (487.8, 488.7) N/A 875,592 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Okmulgee County 6 600.9 (556.3, 648.4) 1 (1, 16) 140 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Alfalfa County 6 566.1 (469.7, 678.4) 2 (1, 73) 25 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.8)
Kiowa County 6 565.4 (478.6, 664.4) 3 (1, 68) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Blaine County 6 562.1 (479.3, 656.0) 4 (1, 69) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Harper County 6 555.6 (429.5, 710.0) 5 (1, 77) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Latimer County 6 549.0 (475.1, 632.3) 6 (1, 68) 43 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.4)
Creek County 6 548.2 (516.9, 581.0) 7 (1, 34) 242 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Craig County 6 542.4 (477.4, 614.4) 8 (1, 68) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Sequoyah County 6 539.4 (498.9, 582.5) 9 (2, 51) 139 stable stable trend 4.8 (0.0, 9.8)
Hughes County 6 538.8 (469.5, 615.8) 10 (1, 69) 45 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Pontotoc County 6 536.1 (492.5, 582.6) 11 (1, 54) 115 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
McClain County 6 535.8 (492.2, 582.4) 12 (1, 57) 118 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Ottawa County 6 533.8 (486.9, 584.3) 13 (1, 59) 100 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Kingfisher County 6 532.5 (465.3, 607.0) 14 (1, 70) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Greer County 6 532.0 (430.7, 650.9) 15 (1, 77) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.4)
Love County 6 526.6 (449.1, 614.4) 16 (1, 74) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Muskogee County 6 526.1 (493.7, 560.2) 17 (4, 50) 207 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Okfuskee County 6 525.4 (455.5, 603.5) 18 (1, 72) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Johnston County 6 521.9 (447.0, 606.5) 19 (1, 74) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Carter County 6 520.2 (481.7, 561.0) 20 (3, 59) 142 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.2, 0.2)
Mayes County 6 520.1 (480.2, 562.6) 21 (3, 60) 135 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Kay County 6 515.7 (478.1, 555.7) 22 (4, 59) 145 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Tulsa County 6 515.3 (504.0, 526.9) 23 (12, 37) 1,657 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Nowata County 6 510.9 (438.6, 592.9) 24 (1, 75) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
McCurtain County 6 510.8 (466.7, 558.3) 25 (4, 66) 104 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Grant County 6 509.5 (397.8, 645.7) 26 (1, 77) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.3)
Pawnee County 6 506.1 (446.2, 572.3) 27 (2, 73) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Choctaw County 6 504.4 (442.3, 573.6) 28 (1, 75) 51 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Comanche County 6 500.0 (473.8, 527.2) 29 (11, 60) 286 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Harmon County 6 499.3 (355.8, 685.2) 30 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 3.0)
Stephens County 6 495.6 (458.4, 535.1) 31 (7, 67) 140 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Haskell County 6 493.6 (427.4, 568.0) 32 (2, 76) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Canadian County 6 493.4 (469.4, 518.4) 33 (14, 61) 337 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Pottawatomie County 6 493.2 (462.3, 525.6) 34 (9, 65) 199 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Le Flore County 6 493.1 (457.6, 530.8) 35 (8, 69) 151 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Seminole County 6 491.0 (440.8, 545.7) 36 (5, 74) 74 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Cherokee County 6 488.9 (451.1, 529.2) 37 (8, 71) 131 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Rogers County 6 487.2 (460.7, 514.9) 38 (14, 65) 264 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Grady County 6 486.6 (452.2, 522.9) 39 (11, 70) 160 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Beckham County 6 485.2 (429.6, 546.0) 40 (4, 76) 58 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Cleveland County 6 482.3 (465.3, 499.8) 41 (23, 62) 647 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Texas County 6 481.9 (419.8, 550.3) 42 (3, 76) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Marshall County 6 481.8 (426.3, 543.2) 43 (4, 75) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Jackson County 6 480.9 (428.0, 538.5) 44 (5, 76) 62 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Pittsburg County 6 479.8 (443.8, 518.2) 45 (12, 72) 137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Washington County 6 479.6 (445.8, 515.4) 46 (13, 71) 158 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Oklahoma County 6 478.4 (468.3, 488.6) 47 (32, 59) 1,822 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Cimarron County 6 476.6 (319.6, 688.0) 48 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.4, 2.5)
Jefferson County 6 476.5 (385.9, 584.0) 49 (1, 77) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Wagoner County 6 474.4 (446.1, 504.2) 50 (20, 71) 221 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Washita County 6 473.5 (402.7, 553.9) 51 (3, 77) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Coal County 6 472.4 (375.9, 588.0) 52 (1, 77) 18 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.0)
Garvin County 6 472.1 (425.7, 522.5) 53 (9, 76) 79 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Woods County 6 471.2 (391.5, 563.1) 54 (2, 77) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
Bryan County 6 470.1 (433.6, 508.9) 55 (14, 74) 128 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Lincoln County 6 461.1 (421.6, 503.6) 56 (18, 76) 106 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Caddo County 6 458.9 (414.0, 507.6) 57 (14, 77) 79 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Ellis County 6 458.3 (346.3, 598.0) 58 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.9)
Roger Mills County 6 457.9 (340.7, 605.1) 59 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.7, 0.0)
Custer County 6 456.7 (407.5, 510.3) 60 (11, 77) 65 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Pushmataha County 6 454.9 (391.2, 527.5) 61 (5, 77) 39 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.6)
Payne County 6 454.5 (422.9, 487.7) 62 (27, 75) 161 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Murray County 6 453.6 (393.5, 521.1) 63 (6, 77) 43 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Logan County 6 451.0 (415.2, 489.1) 64 (25, 76) 125 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Dewey County 6 450.9 (349.2, 575.1) 65 (1, 77) 14 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.0)
Tillman County 6 450.8 (370.1, 545.5) 66 (3, 77) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
McIntosh County 6 450.4 (401.9, 504.0) 67 (16, 77) 72 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Major County 6 449.4 (367.8, 545.0) 68 (3, 77) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.9)
Atoka County 6 446.2 (386.6, 512.9) 69 (12, 77) 42 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Garfield County 6 446.1 (414.4, 479.7) 70 (31, 76) 153 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -2.0)
Adair County 6 442.6 (391.0, 499.2) 71 (16, 77) 57 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Cotton County 6 433.4 (344.3, 540.8) 72 (2, 77) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.2)
Delaware County 6 433.2 (400.3, 468.5) 73 (38, 77) 147 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Noble County 6 430.8 (364.8, 506.1) 74 (11, 77) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Woodward County 6 424.2 (372.3, 481.5) 75 (25, 77) 50 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Osage County 6 417.7 (386.0, 451.6) 76 (50, 77) 136 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Beaver County 6 400.7 (313.9, 506.7) 77 (7, 77) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.1, 6.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/08/2023 9:33 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top