Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

American Indian/Alaska Native Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 639.6 (627.1, 652.4) N/A 2,118 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 408.9 (405.4, 412.5) N/A 11,028 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jackson County 6 Rural 654.6 (367.5, 1,079.5) 25 (1, 58) 3
*
*
Love County 6 Rural 464.2 (272.2, 739.7) 57 (2, 58) 4 falling falling trend -45.3 (-78.6, -0.7)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 561.3 (326.0, 901.2) 42 (1, 58) 4 stable stable trend -9.5 (-27.3, 0.3)
Beckham County 6 Rural 840.7 (509.0, 1,305.6) 1 (1, 58) 5
*
*
Coal County 6 Rural 418.5 (263.2, 631.4) 58 (11, 58) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.5, 0.9)
Blaine County 6 Rural 639.0 (400.0, 966.8) 26 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend -3.8 (-41.5, 9.1)
Noble County 6 Rural 570.1 (365.3, 844.3) 38 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.5, 10.0)
Garfield County 6 Urban 545.0 (366.7, 776.1) 47 (2, 58) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.5, 1.3)
Logan County 6 Urban 482.3 (337.8, 665.7) 56 (8, 58) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.0, 5.6)
Murray County 6 Rural 508.8 (365.7, 687.3) 52 (8, 58) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.8)
Atoka County 6 Rural 484.5 (359.3, 639.1) 55 (11, 58) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.7)
Custer County 6 Rural 710.3 (529.7, 930.1) 13 (1, 57) 11 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.1, 7.6)
Haskell County 6 Rural 546.1 (412.3, 708.6) 46 (6, 58) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.3, 4.8)
Marshall County 6 Rural 634.0 (478.8, 824.9) 27 (1, 57) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.9, 6.1)
Pushmataha County 6 Rural 504.1 (381.6, 653.5) 54 (12, 58) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 2.1)
Johnston County 6 Rural 752.3 (575.3, 965.5) 6 (1, 53) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.7, 5.6)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 569.1 (438.5, 726.3) 39 (4, 58) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.6)
Latimer County 6 Rural 618.1 (480.3, 782.3) 31 (2, 57) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.1)
Nowata County 6 Rural 769.9 (595.7, 977.6) 5 (1, 52) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 4.1)
Hughes County 6 Rural 528.4 (412.1, 667.5) 50 (10, 58) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Stephens County 6 Rural 539.7 (421.1, 681.5) 49 (9, 58) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.6)
Garvin County 6 Rural 791.0 (625.0, 985.9) 3 (1, 47) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 4.0)
Grady County 6 Urban 517.1 (405.0, 649.5) 51 (13, 58) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.7)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 657.0 (518.0, 821.2) 24 (1, 56) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 4.0)
McClain County 6 Urban 553.5 (439.1, 688.2) 45 (8, 58) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 3.0)
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 750.3 (599.4, 927.3) 8 (1, 49) 18 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 5.7)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 713.1 (571.3, 878.7) 12 (1, 52) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.2, 4.5)
Payne County 6 Rural 695.9 (558.9, 854.5) 16 (1, 51) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.2)
Craig County 6 Rural 714.7 (589.6, 858.6) 10 (1, 47) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.8)
Carter County 6 Rural 605.7 (501.0, 724.9) 32 (5, 56) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.6)
Kay County 6 Rural 690.9 (572.9, 825.0) 17 (1, 51) 26 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.5)
Seminole County 6 Rural 588.6 (490.8, 699.9) 36 (8, 57) 27 rising rising trend 12.9 (2.0, 24.5)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 619.1 (514.8, 738.7) 30 (4, 55) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Caddo County 6 Rural 543.3 (459.2, 638.2) 48 (19, 57) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.3)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 667.7 (567.4, 780.2) 22 (2, 50) 33 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 4.0)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 507.8 (431.4, 593.4) 53 (26, 58) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.7)
Canadian County 6 Urban 565.5 (475.4, 667.3) 41 (11, 57) 33 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 1.5)
Bryan County 6 Rural 568.7 (485.6, 661.5) 40 (14, 56) 35 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.4)
Comanche County 6 Urban 560.8 (479.9, 651.2) 43 (16, 57) 37 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 679.0 (582.0, 787.0) 19 (2, 48) 38 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 3.1)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 662.7 (572.3, 763.0) 23 (3, 48) 41 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.2)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 673.0 (580.1, 776.0) 21 (2, 49) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.5)
Osage County 6 Urban 576.6 (498.3, 663.5) 37 (14, 56) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.3)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 596.0 (517.5, 682.8) 33 (10, 54) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.1)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 777.9 (679.9, 885.6) 4 (1, 30) 48 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 4.3)
Adair County 6 Rural 594.2 (520.7, 675.0) 34 (13, 53) 51 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 621.4 (545.1, 705.1) 29 (8, 52) 51 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.3)
Creek County 6 Urban 703.6 (617.5, 797.9) 15 (2, 41) 52 stable stable trend -9.0 (-23.2, 3.7)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 713.2 (627.3, 807.1) 11 (1, 38) 57 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.2)
Mayes County 6 Rural 811.9 (717.7, 914.3) 2 (1, 23) 63 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Delaware County 6 Rural 629.2 (556.4, 708.6) 28 (9, 50) 64 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.4)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 556.5 (495.9, 622.2) 44 (22, 55) 70 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.2)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 710.0 (636.8, 789.3) 14 (2, 35) 71 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 684.5 (615.0, 759.4) 18 (4, 40) 79 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Rogers County 6 Urban 751.6 (679.7, 828.8) 7 (1, 28) 92 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 676.7 (616.6, 740.9) 20 (5, 39) 105 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.4)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 590.1 (548.1, 634.4) 35 (21, 49) 157 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.8)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 741.3 (699.3, 785.1) 9 (2, 22) 274 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 5:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top