Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 21.0 (20.3, 21.6) N/A 939 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.3, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Canadian County 6 Urban 23.3 (20.0, 27.1) 22 (8, 41) 36 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.4)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 22.4 (20.1, 25.0) 24 (11, 39) 68 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.5)
Comanche County 6 Urban 23.9 (20.0, 28.2) 19 (6, 41) 28 rising rising trend 17.2 (3.5, 33.8)
Creek County 6 Urban 21.9 (17.5, 27.1) 27 (7, 49) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.8)
Garfield County 6 Urban 22.0 (17.5, 27.4) 26 (7, 49) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.8, 4.0)
Grady County 6 Urban 22.0 (17.0, 28.0) 25 (6, 50) 14 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.7, 7.1)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 20.3 (14.4, 27.8) 33 (6, 54) 9 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.7, 7.9)
Logan County 6 Urban 24.7 (19.0, 31.6) 16 (3, 47) 14 stable stable trend -6.0 (-24.5, 4.2)
McClain County 6 Urban 33.0 (25.8, 41.7) 4 (1, 26) 15 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 8.1)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 20.9 (19.5, 22.3) 29 (18, 41) 172 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.8)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 19.0 (13.5, 26.1) 40 (7, 54) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.1, 8.0)
Osage County 6 Urban 13.2 (9.2, 18.3) 54 (31, 54) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.5, 2.4)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 24.0 (15.1, 36.6) 18 (1, 54) 5
*
*
Rogers County 6 Urban 20.5 (16.8, 24.8) 31 (11, 50) 22 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.8)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 25.2 (19.1, 32.7) 13 (3, 48) 12
*
*
Tulsa County 6 Urban 20.0 (18.5, 21.5) 34 (21, 44) 146 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.4)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 21.8 (17.7, 26.5) 28 (8, 48) 21 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 7.2)
Adair County 6 Rural 14.7 (8.2, 24.2) 52 (9, 54) 3
*
*
Atoka County 6 Rural 26.1 (16.6, 39.6) 11 (1, 53) 5
*
*
Beckham County 6 Rural 19.5 (12.2, 29.5) 37 (4, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.4, 4.8)
Blaine County 6 Rural 27.3 (15.1, 46.1) 8 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Bryan County 6 Rural 18.0 (13.0, 24.3) 44 (11, 54) 9 stable stable trend -4.9 (-19.8, 1.2)
Caddo County 6 Rural 15.2 (9.7, 22.9) 50 (12, 54) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.4, 7.8)
Carter County 6 Rural 19.0 (14.2, 25.0) 39 (10, 54) 11 stable stable trend -18.4 (-48.1, 2.5)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 15.9 (11.4, 21.5) 48 (18, 54) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 3.8)
Craig County 6 Rural 18.7 (10.5, 31.0) 42 (3, 54) 3 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.8, 2.4)
Custer County 6 Rural 14.2 (8.8, 21.9) 53 (15, 54) 4 stable stable trend -18.3 (-68.7, 4.8)
Delaware County 6 Rural 15.6 (11.3, 21.2) 49 (18, 54) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 3.1)
Garvin County 6 Rural 31.5 (23.1, 42.1) 6 (1, 40) 10 rising rising trend 8.2 (4.5, 13.5)
Haskell County 6 Rural 24.8 (15.2, 39.0) 14 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural 26.5 (18.2, 37.3) 10 (1, 51) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.4, 8.6)
Kay County 6 Rural 18.4 (13.3, 24.8) 43 (10, 54) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 3.1)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 24.8 (15.3, 38.2) 15 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.3, 4.9)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 38.7 (22.8, 61.8) 1 (1, 49) 4
*
*
Latimer County 6 Rural 23.7 (13.6, 39.5) 20 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Le Flore County 6 Rural 18.7 (14.0, 24.7) 41 (11, 54) 11 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.2, 6.7)
Major County 6 Rural 34.9 (20.3, 56.8) 3 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural 27.3 (18.7, 39.2) 9 (1, 50) 7
*
*
Mayes County 6 Rural 19.2 (13.7, 26.2) 38 (8, 54) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 4.5)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 17.0 (11.5, 24.5) 47 (11, 54) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.4, 7.8)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 22.9 (14.7, 34.4) 23 (2, 54) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (0.0, 7.1)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 17.9 (13.9, 22.7) 45 (15, 54) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.6)
Nowata County 6 Rural 24.1 (13.6, 40.5) 17 (1, 54) 3
*
*
Ottawa County 6 Rural 25.3 (18.4, 34.0) 12 (2, 50) 10 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.6, 8.0)
Payne County 6 Rural 23.6 (18.6, 29.4) 21 (5, 47) 17 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 4.8)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 17.5 (12.7, 23.5) 46 (13, 54) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.9)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 15.2 (10.4, 21.4) 51 (18, 54) 7 falling falling trend -23.4 (-44.2, -0.6)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 19.7 (15.6, 24.6) 35 (11, 52) 16 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.6, 5.4)
Seminole County 6 Rural 19.5 (12.8, 28.6) 36 (6, 54) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.2, 8.1)
Stephens County 6 Rural 32.0 (25.4, 39.9) 5 (1, 26) 18 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.0, 8.0)
Tillman County 6 Rural 37.1 (21.1, 61.3) 2 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural 20.7 (16.0, 26.5) 30 (8, 52) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.7)
Woods County 6 Rural 31.2 (18.3, 50.9) 7 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Woodward County 6 Rural 20.4 (13.0, 30.8) 32 (4, 54) 5
*
*
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/15/2024 5:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top