Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County
Breast (All Stages^), 2015-2019
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by CI*Rank
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Oklahoma6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 124.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 122.1 to 126.3 and 2,932 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 1.2.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 128.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 127.9 to 128.3 and 253,845 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.3 to 0.5.
Greer County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 166.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 104.2 to 253.6 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 69)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 3.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 8.4.
Caddo County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 153.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 127.1 to 184.1 and 26 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 43)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -10.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -24.6 to 6.7.
Kingfisher County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 144.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 111.6 to 184.8 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 58)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.2 to 2.3.
Rogers County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 141.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 127.9 to 156.9 and 81 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (1, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 2.5.
Washington County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 137.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 119.6 to 157.5 and 48 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 45)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.5 to 1.9.
Tulsa County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 137.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 131.8 to 142.7 and 518 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (3, 23)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 0.9.
Kay County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 136.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 117.0 to 158.6 and 40 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (1, 49)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 3.1.
Canadian County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 135.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 123.4 to 147.4 and 103 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (2, 38)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.8 to 0.3.
Le Flore County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 133.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 114.9 to 154.0 and 41 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (1, 48)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 3.8.
Pawnee County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 131.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 101.8 to 168.4 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (1, 64)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 4.6.
Oklahoma County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 130.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 125.8 to 135.6 and 581 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (7, 30)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 2.0.
Creek County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 130.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 115.7 to 146.6 and 61 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (2, 48)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 0.8.
Comanche County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 130.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 117.5 to 143.7 and 82 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (3, 43)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.4 to 3.0.
Garvin County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 129.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 105.0 to 157.0 and 22 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (1, 60)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to 2.9.
Logan County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 128.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 110.4 to 149.9 and 37 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (2, 55)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 0.6.
McCurtain County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 128.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 107.1 to 152.7 and 28 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (1, 58)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 2.3.
Craig County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 126.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.0 to 165.7 and 12 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (1, 68)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 2.6.
Pushmataha County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 126.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.7 to 171.7 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (1, 68)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -21.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -41.5 to 6.1.
Sequoyah County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 125.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 107.0 to 147.5 and 34 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (2, 58)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 2.6.
Payne County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 125.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 109.5 to 143.8 and 47 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (3, 54)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 1.1.
McClain County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 124.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 104.4 to 147.8 and 28 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (2, 60)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.4 to 1.3.
Cleveland County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 124.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 116.2 to 132.7 and 188 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (9, 44)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.7 to -0.2.
Pottawatomie County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 124.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 109.8 to 139.9 and 57 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (4, 53)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 2.6.
Stephens County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 123.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 105.9 to 144.3 and 38 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (2, 58)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.4 to 1.0.
Jefferson County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 123.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 76.2 to 189.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 25 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.4 to 3.4.
Wagoner County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 122.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 109.1 to 138.0 and 62 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 26 (4, 53)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 1.6.
Woods County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 122.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 80.5 to 178.9 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 27 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.5 to 2.1.
Tillman County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 121.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.4 to 181.2 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 28 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.9 to 6.2.
Cotton County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 121.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 76.0 to 186.5 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 29 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.4 to 2.2.
Lincoln County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 120.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 101.0 to 143.6 and 29 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 30 (2, 62)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.9 to 1.5.
Alfalfa County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 120.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.5 to 188.5 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 31 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Noble County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 119.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 85.4 to 162.6 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 32 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.4 to 2.7.
Latimer County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 118.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.2 to 166.5 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 33 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 5.6.
Marshall County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 117.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.5 to 151.4 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 34 (1, 69)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.1 to 2.0.
Kiowa County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 117.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.8 to 167.3 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 35 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.0 to 4.6.
Beckham County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 115.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.5 to 146.8 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 36 (2, 69)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.7 to 2.2.
Osage County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 114.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.6 to 133.1 and 40 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 37 (6, 63)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 2.9.
Okmulgee County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 113.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.8 to 134.6 and 31 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 38 (5, 65)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -12.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -28.6 to 7.1.
Major County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 113.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.8 to 168.6 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 39 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.7 to 4.0.
Cherokee County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 113.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 96.1 to 132.9 and 33 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 40 (5, 65)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 1.6.
Pittsburg County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 113.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.5 to 133.7 and 33 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 41 (6, 64)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 2.5.
Nowata County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 112.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 79.9 to 156.2 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 42 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.2 to 4.3.
Grady County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 112.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 96.9 to 130.6 and 38 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 43 (8, 63)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 1.6.
Okfuskee County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 110.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 78.1 to 153.6 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 44 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.0 to 0.0.
Muskogee County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 109.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 95.6 to 125.2 and 48 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 45 (16, 64)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.0 to 0.7.
Jackson County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 109.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 85.6 to 137.4 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 46 (4, 69)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.8 to 2.5.
Delaware County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 108.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.6 to 128.8 and 34 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 47 (9, 67)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to 2.4.
Garfield County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 108.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.1 to 125.5 and 40 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 48 (13, 65)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 1.6.
Bryan County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 107.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.3 to 126.8 and 33 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 49 (11, 66)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 0.2.
Pontotoc County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 107.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 89.1 to 129.2 and 25 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 50 (8, 67)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 19.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 8.8 to 30.3.
Johnston County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 107.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 75.1 to 149.1 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 51 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.2 to 3.9.
Carter County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 106.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.7 to 124.5 and 35 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 52 (13, 66)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.7 to 1.6.
Haskell County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 104.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.1 to 144.8 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 53 (2, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.5 to 1.4.
Grant County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 103.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 54.8 to 180.0 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 54 (1, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.0 to 2.6.
Mayes County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 102.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.0 to 122.0 and 29 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 55 (16, 69)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.5 to -0.9.
Adair County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 77.7 to 129.7 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 56 (6, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.4 to 1.2.
Woodward County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 99.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.7 to 130.3 and 11 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 57 (6, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.3 to 1.1.
Choctaw County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 99.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 72.2 to 133.9 and 10 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 58 (4, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -2.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.1 to -0.1.
Murray County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 97.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.1 to 133.1 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 59 (4, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 2.5.
Blaine County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 96.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.8 to 137.8 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 60 (3, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to 2.4.
Washita County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 96.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 64.9 to 137.6 and 7 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 61 (2, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -3.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.2 to -0.8.
Custer County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 95.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 74.4 to 121.3 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 62 (13, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to 1.1.
Seminole County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 93.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 73.5 to 117.1 and 16 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 63 (17, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.0 to 1.6.
Atoka County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 62.8 to 127.6 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 64 (7, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.5 to 1.1.
Texas County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.4 to 121.7 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 65 (12, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.2 to 5.1.
Hughes County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 86.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 59.5 to 121.2 and 8 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 66 (12, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.1 to 1.4.
Ottawa County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 85.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 67.7 to 107.0 and 18 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 67 (35, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.3 to 0.3.
Beaver County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 84.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 47.6 to 141.8 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 68 (2, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.4 to 5.9.
McIntosh County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 83.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 63.4 to 107.8 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 69 (32, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.2 to 0.7.
Love County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 71.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 43.6 to 109.9 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 70 (26, 70)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -4.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.2 to 0.3.
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2023 5:15 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.