Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 104.0 (102.1, 105.9) N/A 2,418 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Roger Mills County 6 173.4 (98.5, 280.7) 1 (1, 68) 3
*
*
Grant County 6 157.8 (91.4, 252.2) 2 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Coal County 6 151.3 (95.5, 227.2) 3 (1, 68) 5
*
*
Pushmataha County 6 150.8 (108.6, 203.7) 4 (1, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.4, 5.1)
Kiowa County 6 146.6 (101.3, 204.7) 5 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.3, 7.5)
Ottawa County 6 139.2 (115.1, 166.8) 6 (1, 41) 24 stable stable trend 2.5 (0.0, 5.4)
Tillman County 6 133.6 (87.9, 194.2) 7 (1, 68) 5 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.3, 8.9)
Kingfisher County 6 128.1 (97.4, 165.2) 9 (1, 63) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 4.9)
Mayes County 6 127.9 (108.1, 150.3) 8 (2, 50) 30 stable stable trend 4.6 (-7.7, 19.5)
Kay County 6 124.2 (104.7, 146.1) 11 (2, 50) 29 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.1)
McCurtain County 6 123.7 (101.8, 148.9) 13 (2, 58) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Okmulgee County 6 123.1 (102.8, 146.1) 12 (2, 54) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.4)
Johnston County 6 122.8 (86.3, 169.2) 10 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.7, 7.5)
McClain County 6 122.2 (103.4, 143.4) 14 (3, 54) 30 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.7)
Sequoyah County 6 119.6 (100.6, 141.1) 15 (3, 56) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.3)
Noble County 6 118.1 (83.4, 162.4) 16 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.6, 10.9)
Garvin County 6 118.0 (95.2, 144.5) 17 (3, 61) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.7)
Rogers County 6 115.6 (103.2, 129.1) 18 (6, 52) 64 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.1)
Jefferson County 6 115.1 (67.0, 183.0) 21 (1, 69) 3
*
*
Creek County 6 115.0 (100.7, 130.7) 23 (5, 54) 47 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.2)
Pittsburg County 6 114.4 (96.2, 134.9) 20 (4, 60) 28 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 3.4)
Pottawatomie County 6 114.1 (100.3, 129.3) 22 (5, 54) 49 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Washington County 6 114.1 (97.1, 133.1) 19 (4, 57) 33 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.5)
Stephens County 6 113.1 (94.7, 134.0) 24 (4, 61) 27 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.8)
Choctaw County 6 112.6 (81.4, 151.6) 25 (2, 68) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 3.0)
Hughes County 6 112.0 (81.2, 150.6) 26 (2, 68) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 1.7)
Craig County 6 111.5 (81.2, 149.3) 27 (2, 68) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.2, 2.7)
Tulsa County 6 110.7 (106.1, 115.5) 29 (16, 41) 440 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.3)
Pawnee County 6 110.6 (82.2, 145.5) 30 (2, 68) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 4.7)
Le Flore County 6 109.9 (93.2, 128.6) 28 (6, 62) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.3, 4.1)
Washita County 6 107.9 (73.6, 152.2) 32 (1, 69) 6 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.8, 9.5)
Muskogee County 6 107.6 (93.5, 123.2) 31 (8, 61) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.2)
Payne County 6 105.0 (90.7, 120.6) 33 (9, 62) 41 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.9)
Cherokee County 6 104.8 (88.0, 123.8) 34 (8, 65) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.9)
Delaware County 6 104.2 (85.7, 125.4) 37 (7, 66) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.9)
Texas County 6 103.6 (80.0, 131.8) 35 (4, 68) 13 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 6.3)
Jackson County 6 103.5 (80.7, 130.5) 36 (4, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-13.2, 0.4)
Latimer County 6 103.4 (67.8, 150.4) 41 (2, 69) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.5, 6.2)
Nowata County 6 103.2 (69.0, 148.2) 42 (2, 69) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.6, 5.5)
Comanche County 6 103.0 (92.6, 114.2) 40 (16, 61) 75 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.9)
Canadian County 6 102.1 (93.1, 111.7) 43 (18, 59) 95 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.8)
Atoka County 6 101.5 (72.3, 138.2) 38 (2, 69) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.3, 5.3)
Grady County 6 101.1 (86.4, 117.7) 44 (11, 64) 34 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.8)
Haskell County 6 100.7 (70.1, 139.9) 39 (2, 69) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.2, 3.9)
Greer County 6 99.9 (59.0, 158.3) 46 (1, 69) 4
*
*
Oklahoma County 6 99.5 (95.6, 103.7) 45 (30, 56) 480 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Lincoln County 6 99.4 (80.5, 121.5) 47 (7, 67) 19 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 3.7)
Pontotoc County 6 98.3 (80.3, 119.0) 48 (10, 67) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 1.9)
Beckham County 6 96.9 (74.6, 123.7) 49 (7, 69) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-12.6, 1.1)
McIntosh County 6 96.1 (70.4, 127.9) 50 (5, 69) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 2.0)
Garfield County 6 94.9 (80.7, 110.8) 51 (17, 66) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Wagoner County 6 94.7 (82.8, 107.8) 52 (22, 66) 46 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Carter County 6 94.0 (78.6, 111.4) 53 (15, 67) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Blaine County 6 93.3 (59.5, 138.9) 55 (3, 69) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.1, 6.1)
Murray County 6 93.2 (65.1, 129.0) 56 (5, 69) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.4, 3.1)
Logan County 6 92.7 (77.5, 110.0) 58 (17, 68) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.9)
Cleveland County 6 92.5 (86.1, 99.3) 54 (35, 65) 158 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Adair County 6 92.3 (70.0, 119.3) 60 (9, 69) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.6)
Bryan County 6 92.3 (76.7, 110.1) 57 (17, 68) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Seminole County 6 91.3 (69.9, 117.0) 59 (9, 69) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Caddo County 6 91.2 (71.8, 114.0) 61 (14, 69) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.3)
Custer County 6 89.6 (69.5, 113.5) 62 (12, 69) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.7)
Marshall County 6 88.1 (62.5, 120.4) 63 (7, 69) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.1, 4.5)
Love County 6 81.6 (52.1, 121.5) 64 (7, 69) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-21.6, 1.4)
Major County 6 81.0 (46.2, 131.0) 65 (3, 69) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-7.5, 5.9)
Osage County 6 77.2 (62.7, 93.9) 66 (34, 69) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.1)
Woodward County 6 72.8 (53.0, 97.4) 67 (29, 69) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.6, 3.4)
Okfuskee County 6 70.5 (46.0, 103.4) 68 (20, 69) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.5, 6.9)
Woods County 6 65.8 (36.6, 108.0) 69 (13, 69) 3
*
*
Alfalfa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/23/2024 7:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top