Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum (Late Stage^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Percent of Cases with Late Stage
 sort by percent late descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 67.3 (65.3, 69.3) N/A 902 56.0
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 64.2 (64.0, 64.4) N/A 72,697 59.1
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 116.2 (75.5, 171.2) 1 (1, 48) 5 68.4
Adair County 6 Rural 110.3 (77.3, 152.8) 2 (1, 45) 7 68.5
Nowata County 6 Rural 104.1 (62.7, 162.1) 3 (1, 54) 4 58.8
Latimer County 6 Rural 102.6 (62.7, 158.4) 4 (1, 54) 4 50.0
Choctaw County 6 Rural 95.6 (62.7, 139.5) 5 (1, 54) 6 57.1
McCurtain County 6 Rural 94.7 (71.2, 123.5) 6 (1, 45) 11 58.3
Hughes County 6 Rural 92.3 (58.9, 138.0) 7 (1, 55) 5 77.4
Kiowa County 6 Rural 90.5 (51.2, 148.3) 8 (1, 55) 3 64.0
Atoka County 6 Rural 87.9 (56.0, 131.5) 9 (1, 55) 5 58.5
Creek County 6 Urban 86.5 (71.3, 103.9) 10 (2, 41) 23 59.4
Muskogee County 6 Rural 86.3 (70.2, 105.1) 11 (2, 44) 20 61.8
Craig County 6 Rural 86.3 (56.2, 127.0) 12 (1, 54) 5 61.9
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 84.3 (69.0, 102.1) 13 (2, 43) 22 72.2
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 83.9 (63.5, 108.9) 14 (1, 49) 12 55.2
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 83.4 (63.2, 108.0) 15 (2, 51) 12 53.6
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 82.5 (63.1, 105.9) 16 (2, 50) 13 54.8
Logan County 6 Urban 82.4 (63.9, 104.6) 17 (2, 49) 14 70.3
Cherokee County 6 Rural 81.9 (63.2, 104.4) 18 (2, 50) 13 56.3
Caddo County 6 Rural 81.0 (56.8, 111.9) 19 (1, 54) 7 51.4
Haskell County 6 Rural 80.9 (47.3, 128.7) 20 (1, 55) 4 60.0
Mayes County 6 Rural 79.8 (60.8, 102.9) 21 (2, 52) 12 50.0
McIntosh County 6 Rural 78.6 (55.5, 108.3) 22 (1, 54) 8 62.9
Ottawa County 6 Rural 75.4 (54.2, 102.0) 23 (2, 55) 9 57.3
Garfield County 6 Urban 74.3 (58.7, 92.9) 24 (5, 52) 16 56.7
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 73.7 (44.6, 114.8) 25 (1, 55) 4 48.8
Custer County 6 Rural 73.5 (49.6, 104.8) 26 (2, 55) 6 50.0
Lincoln County 6 Urban 72.8 (53.6, 96.7) 27 (3, 54) 10 56.3
Kay County 6 Rural 72.7 (55.7, 93.1) 28 (5, 54) 13 47.4
Le Flore County 6 Rural 72.4 (55.4, 92.9) 29 (5, 53) 13 62.1
Washington County 6 Rural 72.1 (56.3, 90.8) 30 (5, 53) 15 67.0
Wagoner County 6 Urban 70.9 (57.4, 86.7) 31 (7, 52) 20 63.1
Pushmataha County 6 Rural 70.9 (41.7, 113.0) 32 (1, 55) 4 69.2
Texas County 6 Rural 70.7 (43.1, 109.4) 33 (2, 55) 4 61.8
Bryan County 6 Rural 70.3 (53.1, 91.2) 34 (5, 54) 12 52.3
Stephens County 6 Rural 69.7 (53.2, 89.6) 35 (6, 54) 13 58.3
Comanche County 6 Urban 69.5 (57.6, 83.0) 36 (11, 52) 25 53.4
Carter County 6 Rural 68.7 (52.1, 88.8) 37 (7, 55) 12 62.5
Marshall County 6 Rural 68.4 (43.6, 102.7) 38 (2, 55) 5 61.5
Rogers County 6 Urban 68.1 (56.0, 82.0) 39 (11, 53) 23 57.3
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 65.9 (50.1, 85.1) 40 (8, 54) 12 55.0
Seminole County 6 Rural 64.4 (43.2, 92.5) 41 (4, 55) 6 62.5
Tulsa County 6 Urban 62.7 (57.9, 67.8) 42 (28, 50) 132 57.9
Garvin County 6 Rural 62.3 (41.6, 89.6) 43 (6, 55) 6 43.5
Osage County 6 Urban 61.4 (46.7, 79.3) 44 (13, 55) 12 50.8
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 61.0 (56.6, 65.7) 45 (31, 51) 147 56.0
Canadian County 6 Urban 59.1 (49.3, 70.3) 46 (24, 54) 27 52.8
McClain County 6 Urban 58.9 (41.9, 80.5) 47 (11, 55) 8 50.6
Delaware County 6 Rural 58.6 (43.7, 76.8) 48 (14, 55) 11 49.6
Payne County 6 Rural 57.3 (43.9, 73.6) 49 (18, 55) 13 47.4
Beckham County 6 Rural 57.1 (34.0, 89.7) 50 (7, 55) 4 43.2
Pawnee County 6 Urban 54.9 (32.9, 86.5) 51 (7, 55) 4 39.6
Woodward County 6 Rural 54.9 (32.6, 86.2) 52 (7, 55) 4 44.2
Cleveland County 6 Urban 54.1 (47.3, 61.6) 53 (35, 55) 47 52.8
Grady County 6 Urban 51.5 (38.2, 68.0) 54 (25, 55) 10 46.8
Jackson County 6 Rural 43.4 (25.5, 69.1) 55 (21, 55) 4 41.9
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Coal County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Johnston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Love County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Major County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Noble County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Tillman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Washita County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 8:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates are computed using cancers classified as malignant based on ICD-O-3. For more information see malignant.html.

^ Late Stage is defined as cases determined to be regional or distant. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top