Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oklahoma 6 | 227.8 (225.6, 230.0) | N/A | 8,823 | stable | 0.0 (-0.2, 0.3) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 225.0 (224.8, 225.3) | N/A | 726,500 | stable | -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0) |
Roger Mills County 6 | 293.0 (211.8, 395.5) | 1 (1, 75) | 10 | rising | 8.8 (1.6, 34.1) |
Pushmataha County 6 | 280.7 (235.2, 332.8) | 2 (1, 63) | 31 | stable | -0.3 (-2.8, 2.1) |
Ottawa County 6 | 277.4 (250.1, 307.0) | 3 (1, 38) | 84 | stable | 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0) |
Latimer County 6 | 270.9 (225.4, 323.4) | 4 (1, 68) | 28 | stable | 2.0 (-0.7, 4.9) |
Kiowa County 6 | 269.2 (220.1, 326.5) | 5 (1, 71) | 25 | stable | 1.0 (-1.4, 3.5) |
Grant County 6 | 267.7 (195.8, 357.8) | 6 (1, 75) | 11 | stable | 0.4 (-2.5, 3.4) |
Craig County 6 | 266.4 (229.4, 308.1) | 7 (1, 64) | 41 | stable | -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6) |
Sequoyah County 6 | 262.8 (240.5, 286.6) | 8 (1, 43) | 112 | stable | 4.9 (-3.3, 15.7) |
Okmulgee County 6 | 261.3 (237.6, 286.7) | 9 (1, 46) | 99 | stable | 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9) |
Coal County 6 | 260.7 (200.2, 334.4) | 10 (1, 74) | 14 | stable | -1.0 (-4.6, 2.6) |
Kingfisher County 6 | 260.6 (224.6, 300.8) | 11 (1, 66) | 41 | stable | 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6) |
McCurtain County 6 | 260.5 (235.2, 287.9) | 12 (1, 52) | 85 | stable | 0.9 (-0.3, 2.2) |
Kay County 6 | 259.4 (237.1, 283.4) | 13 (2, 46) | 110 | stable | 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0) |
Dewey County 6 | 258.7 (196.1, 335.8) | 14 (1, 75) | 13 | stable | 0.1 (-4.0, 4.4) |
Mayes County 6 | 251.4 (229.1, 275.3) | 15 (2, 54) | 105 | stable | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2) |
Hughes County 6 | 249.2 (211.5, 292.0) | 16 (1, 71) | 33 | stable | -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8) |
Pawnee County 6 | 249.2 (215.6, 286.8) | 17 (1, 70) | 45 | stable | 0.8 (-1.3, 3.1) |
Creek County 6 | 249.1 (232.6, 266.4) | 18 (5, 48) | 190 | stable | 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0) |
Pottawatomie County 6 | 248.7 (232.1, 266.1) | 19 (5, 49) | 179 | stable | -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4) |
Greer County 6 | 247.4 (191.8, 314.9) | 20 (1, 75) | 14 | stable | 1.0 (-2.8, 5.1) |
Beckham County 6 | 246.6 (217.0, 279.2) | 21 (2, 68) | 54 | stable | 0.4 (-2.1, 3.1) |
Garvin County 6 | 245.5 (218.5, 274.9) | 22 (2, 67) | 66 | stable | -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1) |
Stephens County 6 | 244.8 (223.6, 267.7) | 23 (4, 60) | 111 | stable | 0.7 (-0.9, 2.2) |
Le Flore County 6 | 244.5 (224.6, 265.8) | 24 (5, 58) | 122 | rising | 5.4 (0.8, 16.0) |
Haskell County 6 | 243.9 (205.7, 287.6) | 25 (1, 73) | 32 | stable | 1.0 (-1.3, 3.5) |
Muskogee County 6 | 243.4 (226.4, 261.3) | 26 (6, 54) | 168 | stable | 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6) |
Jefferson County 6 | 242.9 (186.9, 311.1) | 27 (1, 75) | 15 | stable | -3.1 (-6.7, 0.1) |
Choctaw County 6 | 242.8 (206.7, 283.5) | 28 (1, 73) | 37 | stable | -1.5 (-3.7, 0.7) |
Pontotoc County 6 | 242.3 (219.4, 267.0) | 29 (4, 64) | 88 | stable | 6.5 (-0.7, 12.2) |
McClain County 6 | 240.4 (218.9, 263.6) | 30 (5, 63) | 98 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 1.0) |
Cherokee County 6 | 240.1 (219.6, 262.0) | 31 (6, 63) | 110 | stable | 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7) |
Washington County 6 | 239.5 (220.0, 260.3) | 32 (6, 62) | 126 | stable | 0.2 (-0.9, 1.5) |
Tillman County 6 | 239.2 (189.1, 299.0) | 33 (1, 75) | 18 | stable | 1.2 (-0.8, 3.2) |
Tulsa County 6 | 237.9 (232.4, 243.5) | 34 (19, 44) | 1,499 | stable | -0.3 (-1.8, 0.2) |
Pittsburg County 6 | 237.3 (216.4, 259.8) | 35 (6, 67) | 104 | stable | 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4) |
Payne County 6 | 236.4 (218.9, 255.0) | 36 (9, 61) | 146 | stable | 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1) |
Harmon County 6 | 236.2 (159.2, 340.0) | 37 (1, 76) | 7 | stable | 3.4 (-1.9, 9.6) |
Noble County 6 | 235.2 (195.3, 281.2) | 38 (1, 74) | 27 | stable | 1.2 (-1.1, 3.5) |
Johnston County 6 | 235.1 (193.9, 282.6) | 39 (1, 74) | 26 | rising | 16.2 (1.8, 27.5) |
Rogers County 6 | 233.3 (219.3, 248.1) | 40 (13, 59) | 224 | stable | 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8) |
Okfuskee County 6 | 226.7 (190.8, 267.9) | 41 (3, 74) | 30 | stable | 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8) |
Nowata County 6 | 226.5 (186.6, 273.0) | 42 (2, 75) | 26 | stable | 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7) |
McIntosh County 6 | 226.0 (196.0, 259.6) | 43 (4, 74) | 50 | stable | -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6) |
Jackson County 6 | 225.8 (198.0, 256.4) | 44 (6, 73) | 51 | stable | -0.8 (-2.8, 0.3) |
Marshall County 6 | 223.2 (191.2, 259.4) | 45 (5, 74) | 39 | stable | 0.8 (-2.1, 4.0) |
Washita County 6 | 222.0 (182.5, 268.0) | 46 (2, 75) | 25 | stable | -0.2 (-3.1, 2.6) |
Comanche County 6 | 220.2 (207.7, 233.2) | 47 (28, 69) | 248 | stable | 0.4 (-0.5, 1.5) |
Delaware County 6 | 220.0 (199.6, 242.2) | 48 (15, 72) | 102 | rising | 0.9 (0.1, 1.8) |
Alfalfa County 6 | 220.0 (171.3, 280.0) | 49 (1, 76) | 15 | stable | 0.4 (-3.3, 4.4) |
Canadian County 6 | 219.0 (207.9, 230.6) | 50 (29, 68) | 304 | stable | -0.9 (-2.3, 0.7) |
Bryan County 6 | 218.2 (198.6, 239.2) | 51 (19, 72) | 98 | stable | -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8) |
Texas County 6 | 218.0 (188.8, 250.5) | 52 (6, 75) | 42 | stable | 1.3 (-1.3, 4.2) |
Lincoln County 6 | 217.2 (195.6, 240.8) | 53 (15, 73) | 84 | stable | 0.6 (-1.3, 2.7) |
Oklahoma County 6 | 217.1 (212.3, 222.0) | 54 (40, 64) | 1,641 | falling | -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1) |
Atoka County 6 | 216.9 (182.0, 256.9) | 55 (6, 75) | 30 | stable | 0.9 (-1.1, 2.9) |
Adair County 6 | 215.6 (188.1, 246.2) | 56 (9, 74) | 47 | stable | 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9) |
Logan County 6 | 215.4 (196.9, 235.2) | 57 (21, 73) | 110 | stable | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9) |
Woods County 6 | 215.0 (171.2, 267.0) | 58 (3, 76) | 18 | stable | 0.8 (-2.0, 3.9) |
Ellis County 6 | 213.1 (151.5, 293.3) | 59 (1, 76) | 9 | stable | 0.7 (-3.0, 5.1) |
Blaine County 6 | 212.8 (171.7, 261.2) | 60 (4, 76) | 21 | stable | 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8) |
Carter County 6 | 212.5 (194.1, 232.3) | 61 (24, 73) | 107 | falling | -3.2 (-6.5, -1.3) |
Grady County 6 | 211.5 (194.6, 229.6) | 62 (28, 73) | 127 | stable | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2) |
Wagoner County 6 | 211.4 (197.1, 226.5) | 63 (34, 72) | 175 | stable | 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9) |
Garfield County 6 | 210.7 (193.8, 228.8) | 64 (29, 73) | 125 | stable | -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0) |
Custer County 6 | 210.5 (184.9, 238.6) | 65 (17, 74) | 53 | stable | 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3) |
Seminole County 6 | 210.1 (184.3, 238.6) | 66 (15, 75) | 53 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Cleveland County 6 | 210.1 (202.1, 218.3) | 67 (44, 71) | 553 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
Caddo County 6 | 207.0 (183.4, 232.9) | 68 (22, 75) | 60 | stable | 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7) |
Major County 6 | 206.5 (161.0, 261.5) | 69 (3, 76) | 16 | stable | -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4) |
Murray County 6 | 197.7 (164.3, 236.0) | 70 (16, 76) | 28 | stable | -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5) |
Osage County 6 | 195.7 (178.2, 214.7) | 71 (39, 75) | 105 | stable | 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6) |
Love County 6 | 193.2 (155.2, 238.1) | 72 (9, 76) | 19 | stable | -6.8 (-24.5, 1.0) |
Cotton County 6 | 192.6 (145.2, 252.0) | 73 (3, 76) | 13 | stable | 0.7 (-1.9, 3.5) |
Woodward County 6 | 179.7 (153.4, 209.3) | 74 (44, 76) | 35 | stable | -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2) |
Beaver County 6 | 162.1 (116.6, 220.8) | 75 (17, 76) | 9 | stable | 1.0 (-3.6, 6.4) |
Harper County 6 | 137.4 (90.7, 202.5) | 76 (39, 76) | 6 | stable | -1.1 (-5.5, 3.5) |
Cimarron County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/13/2024 1:52 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cimarron
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/13/2024 1:52 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cimarron
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.