Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 *** 450.2 (447.4, 453.1) N/A 20,358 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 448.6 (448.3, 448.9) N/A 1,703,249 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Kiowa County 6 *** 536.6 (476.6, 602.5) 1 (1, 46) 65 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Harmon County 6 *** 518.5 (416.6, 639.8) 2 (1, 76) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.4)
Okmulgee County 6 *** 515.0 (486.5, 544.8) 3 (1, 23) 260 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Love County 6 *** 511.3 (456.2, 571.7) 4 (1, 58) 67 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Kingfisher County 6 *** 505.7 (459.9, 554.9) 5 (1, 52) 94 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Sequoyah County 6 *** 487.5 (460.7, 515.5) 6 (1, 42) 262 rising rising trend 7.4 (2.8, 12.1)
Latimer County 6 *** 485.7 (433.7, 542.6) 7 (1, 70) 71 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.1)
Harper County 6 *** 482.7 (398.2, 581.1) 8 (1, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Kay County 6 *** 480.0 (454.1, 507.0) 9 (2, 45) 280 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
McClain County 6 *** 479.2 (450.5, 509.3) 10 (2, 51) 217 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Ottawa County 6 *** 479.0 (448.0, 511.6) 11 (2, 55) 190 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Mayes County 6 *** 477.5 (450.7, 505.6) 12 (2, 51) 255 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Creek County 6 *** 474.8 (454.5, 495.8) 13 (4, 44) 436 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Logan County 6 *** 473.9 (447.6, 501.4) 14 (3, 52) 257 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Muskogee County 6 *** 473.5 (452.5, 495.2) 15 (4, 47) 404 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Tulsa County 6 *** 472.7 (465.4, 480.2) 16 (9, 31) 3,287 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Woods County 6 *** 472.4 (413.9, 537.2) 17 (1, 75) 51 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.3)
Greer County 6 *** 471.8 (403.3, 549.2) 18 (1, 76) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Nowata County 6 *** 471.4 (420.9, 526.7) 19 (1, 74) 68 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Grant County 6 *** 468.9 (392.6, 557.0) 20 (1, 77) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Pawnee County 6 *** 468.9 (427.7, 513.2) 21 (1, 70) 103 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Pontotoc County 6 *** 467.8 (439.6, 497.3) 22 (3, 59) 215 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Garvin County 6 *** 466.7 (434.1, 501.2) 23 (3, 65) 162 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Stephens County 6 *** 465.1 (440.0, 491.3) 24 (4, 59) 278 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Blaine County 6 *** 464.5 (411.5, 523.0) 25 (1, 75) 60 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Tillman County 6 *** 463.2 (404.1, 529.1) 26 (1, 76) 48 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Craig County 6 *** 462.4 (420.4, 507.9) 27 (2, 72) 94 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Alfalfa County 6 *** 459.4 (395.9, 531.4) 28 (1, 76) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Le Flore County 6 *** 458.5 (434.5, 483.5) 29 (7, 62) 290 stable stable trend 6.9 (0.0, 14.2)
Okfuskee County 6 *** 457.6 (410.2, 509.2) 30 (1, 74) 71 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Hughes County 6 *** 456.8 (412.2, 505.3) 31 (2, 75) 81 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Cherokee County 6 *** 456.7 (431.2, 483.3) 32 (6, 63) 256 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Rogers County 6 *** 455.8 (437.8, 474.5) 33 (10, 57) 502 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Comanche County 6 *** 454.9 (437.7, 472.6) 34 (11, 57) 547 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Marshall County 6 *** 453.4 (414.7, 495.2) 35 (3, 73) 110 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Caddo County 6 *** 452.1 (420.9, 485.1) 36 (5, 70) 162 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Carter County 6 *** 452.1 (427.7, 477.6) 37 (7, 66) 269 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Jefferson County 6 *** 451.3 (386.8, 524.3) 38 (1, 77) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
McCurtain County 6 *** 449.2 (420.0, 480.0) 39 (6, 70) 187 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Pottawatomie County 6 *** 446.5 (426.4, 467.4) 40 (14, 64) 386 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Choctaw County 6 *** 444.5 (403.5, 488.7) 41 (3, 75) 94 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Washington County 6 *** 444.4 (421.7, 468.0) 42 (12, 67) 311 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Jackson County 6 *** 444.3 (409.3, 481.5) 43 (5, 73) 123 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Oklahoma County 6 *** 444.1 (437.5, 450.7) 44 (29, 55) 3,652 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Cleveland County 6 *** 439.9 (428.8, 451.3) 45 (28, 61) 1,233 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Grady County 6 *** 439.5 (416.7, 463.3) 46 (15, 70) 293 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Canadian County 6 *** 439.3 (423.6, 455.4) 47 (23, 66) 621 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Beckham County 6 *** 439.2 (402.0, 478.9) 48 (6, 75) 107 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Pittsburg County 6 *** 438.9 (414.7, 464.3) 49 (14, 71) 264 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Adair County 6 *** 438.5 (402.2, 477.2) 50 (6, 74) 114 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Noble County 6 *** 434.6 (387.6, 486.1) 51 (4, 76) 66 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Johnston County 6 *** 431.7 (383.4, 484.7) 52 (3, 77) 63 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Lincoln County 6 *** 431.6 (404.3, 460.5) 53 (15, 74) 199 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Seminole County 6 *** 430.7 (398.1, 465.3) 54 (11, 75) 137 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Washita County 6 *** 429.5 (380.9, 482.8) 55 (4, 77) 62 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Pushmataha County 6 *** 429.5 (384.1, 479.3) 56 (5, 77) 73 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.3)
Haskell County 6 *** 425.9 (382.3, 473.6) 57 (7, 77) 75 rising rising trend 9.0 (1.7, 16.9)
Osage County 6 *** 424.4 (401.6, 448.4) 58 (25, 74) 279 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Murray County 6 *** 422.5 (380.7, 467.9) 59 (9, 77) 80 stable stable trend -9.5 (-18.3, 0.2)
Garfield County 6 *** 422.2 (400.8, 444.5) 60 (29, 74) 307 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Dewey County 6 *** 422.2 (353.6, 501.3) 61 (2, 77) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Bryan County 6 *** 420.2 (396.0, 445.6) 62 (26, 75) 238 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Wagoner County 6 *** 418.8 (400.0, 438.3) 63 (36, 74) 394 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Custer County 6 *** 418.8 (385.7, 453.9) 64 (16, 76) 124 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Delaware County 6 *** 416.0 (392.3, 440.9) 65 (29, 76) 274 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Texas County 6 *** 414.7 (374.7, 457.6) 66 (13, 77) 82 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Major County 6 *** 413.2 (357.8, 475.3) 67 (5, 77) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.4)
McIntosh County 6 *** 411.8 (378.7, 447.3) 68 (23, 77) 133 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Cotton County 6 *** 409.5 (348.5, 479.2) 69 (4, 77) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Payne County 6 *** 406.5 (385.6, 428.2) 70 (44, 76) 297 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Cimarron County 6 *** 405.1 (302.5, 533.4) 71 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.3)
Atoka County 6 *** 402.6 (361.5, 447.4) 72 (15, 77) 75 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Roger Mills County 6 *** 401.7 (322.0, 496.3) 73 (2, 77) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.9)
Ellis County 6 *** 399.6 (328.3, 483.4) 74 (2, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.0)
Woodward County 6 *** 392.1 (356.9, 429.8) 75 (34, 77) 94 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Coal County 6 *** 373.4 (311.7, 444.6) 76 (12, 77) 29 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.1)
Beaver County 6 *** 368.3 (306.6, 439.7) 77 (16, 77) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2022 5:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top