Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 228.3 (226.1, 230.5) N/A 8,827 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Canadian County 6 Urban 213.9 (203.1, 225.0) 64 (40, 71) 311 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 208.4 (200.6, 216.5) 67 (50, 71) 565 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Comanche County 6 Urban 222.7 (210.1, 235.9) 53 (30, 68) 251 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4)
Cotton County 6 Urban 171.7 (128.0, 227.3) 73 (24, 76) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.9)
Creek County 6 Urban 250.5 (234.1, 267.7) 22 (7, 51) 194 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Garfield County 6 Urban 214.3 (197.4, 232.4) 62 (28, 72) 130 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Grady County 6 Urban 225.4 (207.8, 244.2) 50 (19, 70) 133 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 228.3 (205.7, 252.8) 47 (14, 71) 86 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.8)
Logan County 6 Urban 208.3 (190.4, 227.5) 68 (36, 73) 110 falling falling trend -4.8 (-11.0, -0.9)
McClain County 6 Urban 235.4 (214.4, 258.0) 40 (11, 68) 99 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 215.1 (210.3, 220.0) 61 (48, 68) 1,616 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 263.9 (239.7, 289.9) 13 (2, 50) 97 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Osage County 6 Urban 216.1 (197.3, 236.3) 60 (26, 72) 113 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 266.6 (231.0, 306.5) 12 (1, 61) 45 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 3.8)
Rogers County 6 Urban 223.5 (209.9, 237.9) 52 (27, 68) 219 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 277.5 (254.1, 302.6) 4 (1, 37) 113 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.2, 12.5)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 231.6 (226.2, 237.1) 44 (31, 54) 1,488 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.2)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 221.8 (207.1, 237.3) 54 (27, 70) 181 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Adair County 6 Rural 244.5 (213.4, 279.0) 34 (2, 70) 48 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.6)
Alfalfa County 6 Rural 209.4 (162.4, 267.9) 66 (3, 76) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.7, 3.7)
Atoka County 6 Rural 219.0 (184.8, 258.1) 57 (7, 74) 31 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Beaver County 6 Rural 163.3 (116.9, 223.4) 74 (24, 76) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.9, 5.8)
Beckham County 6 Rural 233.1 (204.6, 264.6) 42 (6, 72) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.3)
Blaine County 6 Rural 217.0 (174.7, 267.1) 59 (4, 75) 21 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.4)
Bryan County 6 Rural 232.9 (212.3, 255.0) 43 (11, 68) 101 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.0)
Caddo County 6 Rural 226.9 (201.6, 254.6) 49 (12, 72) 62 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Carter County 6 Rural 220.8 (201.8, 241.1) 55 (21, 71) 109 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 260.0 (238.3, 283.2) 17 (3, 48) 116 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.9)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 269.2 (230.9, 312.3) 10 (1, 65) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Coal County 6 Rural 273.7 (210.5, 350.8) 7 (1, 73) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.3)
Craig County 6 Rural 247.3 (211.7, 287.7) 29 (2, 71) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Custer County 6 Rural 219.0 (192.9, 247.6) 58 (13, 73) 56 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Delaware County 6 Rural 231.2 (209.7, 254.5) 45 (10, 70) 102 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Dewey County 6 Rural 303.0 (231.8, 390.0) 1 (1, 70) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.6, 5.5)
Ellis County 6 Rural 230.2 (164.0, 316.0) 46 (1, 76) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.3)
Garvin County 6 Rural 258.8 (230.1, 290.2) 19 (2, 62) 65 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.0)
Grant County 6 Rural 274.9 (201.0, 367.5) 6 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.3)
Greer County 6 Rural 234.7 (179.9, 301.8) 41 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.1, 4.5)
Harmon County 6 Rural 220.2 (146.6, 321.5) 56 (1, 76) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.5, 7.8)
Harper County 6 Rural 155.0 (102.3, 228.6) 76 (15, 76) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.1, 3.0)
Haskell County 6 Rural 271.6 (229.3, 319.7) 9 (1, 65) 33 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.7)
Hughes County 6 Rural 245.5 (208.0, 288.1) 30 (2, 71) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 212.3 (185.5, 241.9) 65 (19, 74) 49 falling falling trend -1.3 (-5.1, -0.2)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 248.4 (189.1, 321.2) 25 (1, 75) 14 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.7, -0.7)
Johnston County 6 Rural 294.4 (246.2, 349.4) 2 (1, 58) 29 rising rising trend 15.7 (3.8, 28.6)
Kay County 6 Rural 245.1 (223.5, 268.2) 33 (5, 63) 105 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 268.6 (231.1, 310.5) 11 (1, 65) 40 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 278.6 (226.7, 339.1) 3 (1, 69) 24 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.4)
Latimer County 6 Rural 276.9 (229.4, 331.7) 5 (1, 68) 27 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 4.9)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 228.2 (208.8, 249.1) 48 (15, 70) 110 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.0)
Love County 6 Rural 177.6 (141.5, 220.5) 72 (34, 76) 18 falling falling trend -8.6 (-20.1, -2.5)
Major County 6 Rural 200.4 (155.6, 254.6) 70 (7, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Marshall County 6 Rural 213.9 (181.7, 250.6) 63 (11, 75) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.3)
Mayes County 6 Rural 262.9 (239.9, 287.7) 14 (2, 47) 107 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 271.7 (245.0, 300.6) 8 (1, 47) 83 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 243.9 (212.3, 279.3) 35 (3, 71) 52 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Murray County 6 Rural 194.2 (161.2, 232.3) 71 (24, 76) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 254.7 (237.2, 273.3) 21 (5, 48) 171 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Noble County 6 Rural 248.2 (206.9, 295.8) 26 (1, 72) 28 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 3.9)
Nowata County 6 Rural 245.1 (201.9, 295.4) 32 (1, 73) 26 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 260.8 (220.7, 306.7) 16 (1, 68) 32 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 257.6 (231.1, 286.4) 20 (2, 60) 76 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.6)
Payne County 6 Rural 245.4 (227.4, 264.3) 31 (8, 57) 150 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 248.1 (226.8, 271.0) 27 (5, 60) 110 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.4)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 242.1 (219.3, 266.8) 36 (7, 66) 89 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 247.4 (230.9, 264.9) 28 (8, 54) 178 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Pushmataha County 6 Rural 250.2 (207.7, 299.4) 24 (1, 71) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.5)
Roger Mills County 6 Rural 262.0 (185.6, 360.4) 15 (1, 76) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.5, 6.7)
Seminole County 6 Rural 224.3 (197.4, 254.1) 51 (10, 72) 55 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Stephens County 6 Rural 237.4 (216.4, 260.0) 39 (9, 68) 106 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Texas County 6 Rural 205.7 (178.0, 236.6) 69 (22, 75) 41 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.7)
Tillman County 6 Rural 250.4 (198.5, 312.5) 23 (1, 74) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.3)
Washington County 6 Rural 238.7 (219.2, 259.5) 38 (10, 65) 124 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.0)
Washita County 6 Rural 258.9 (215.3, 308.9) 18 (1, 71) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5)
Woods County 6 Rural 241.0 (192.5, 298.1) 37 (1, 74) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.8)
Woodward County 6 Rural 162.5 (137.7, 190.6) 75 (64, 76) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 12:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top