Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 1,980.1 (1,964.1, 1,996.1) N/A 12,073 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Harper County 6 Rural 2,679.7 (2,125.0, 3,333.0) 1 (1, 62) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.5)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 2,387.5 (2,143.2, 2,652.2) 2 (1, 33) 71 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.1, 10.2)
Nowata County 6 Rural 2,359.9 (2,053.4, 2,699.2) 3 (1, 54) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Alfalfa County 6 Rural 2,354.5 (1,954.0, 2,812.7) 4 (1, 65) 25 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Caddo County 6 Rural 2,295.5 (2,094.9, 2,510.3) 5 (1, 37) 97 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Mayes County 6 Rural 2,293.8 (2,136.4, 2,459.8) 6 (1, 30) 162 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.4, 7.9)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 2,292.9 (2,132.7, 2,461.9) 7 (1, 29) 154 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.3)
Creek County 6 Urban 2,219.1 (2,102.9, 2,340.0) 8 (2, 29) 278 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Latimer County 6 Rural 2,189.1 (1,907.6, 2,500.0) 9 (1, 63) 44 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 2,187.3 (2,035.2, 2,347.9) 10 (2, 42) 156 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.2, 13.4)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 2,184.7 (2,012.3, 2,368.1) 11 (2, 49) 120 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Kay County 6 Rural 2,180.7 (2,040.1, 2,328.5) 12 (2, 39) 180 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 4.9)
Blaine County 6 Rural 2,180.1 (1,874.5, 2,521.1) 13 (1, 67) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 2,160.1 (1,882.3, 2,467.8) 14 (1, 67) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 2,120.2 (1,959.1, 2,291.3) 15 (3, 55) 130 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 5.4)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 2,116.7 (1,947.2, 2,297.1) 16 (3, 56) 116 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 2,105.2 (1,962.9, 2,255.2) 17 (4, 53) 166 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 2,102.1 (1,736.5, 2,522.4) 18 (1, 73) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.6)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 2,102.1 (1,982.1, 2,227.5) 19 (5, 47) 233 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Johnston County 6 Rural 2,100.6 (1,819.1, 2,413.7) 20 (1, 70) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Comanche County 6 Urban 2,091.0 (1,988.5, 2,197.5) 21 (7, 45) 318 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
McClain County 6 Urban 2,082.0 (1,920.3, 2,253.7) 22 (4, 59) 127 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 2,079.9 (1,962.3, 2,202.7) 23 (7, 51) 239 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Stephens County 6 Rural 2,067.7 (1,932.4, 2,209.9) 24 (5, 55) 176 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.9, 7.4)
Rogers County 6 Urban 2,066.3 (1,964.2, 2,172.4) 25 (8, 48) 313 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 2,056.3 (2,014.9, 2,098.3) 26 (15, 37) 1,934 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 1.1)
Craig County 6 Rural 2,046.5 (1,813.8, 2,300.9) 27 (2, 69) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Woods County 6 Rural 2,020.4 (1,706.1, 2,375.3) 28 (1, 74) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.0)
Marshall County 6 Rural 2,005.9 (1,795.1, 2,234.8) 29 (3, 69) 66 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Seminole County 6 Rural 2,003.1 (1,817.0, 2,203.1) 30 (5, 68) 86 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Payne County 6 Rural 1,994.1 (1,871.4, 2,122.7) 31 (11, 61) 200 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 1,983.9 (1,760.1, 2,228.5) 32 (3, 71) 58 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Grady County 6 Urban 1,975.5 (1,844.4, 2,113.6) 33 (10, 63) 173 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Garvin County 6 Rural 1,953.8 (1,775.5, 2,145.3) 34 (7, 69) 89 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 1,950.5 (1,818.5, 2,089.7) 35 (13, 65) 166 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Garfield County 6 Urban 1,945.6 (1,824.4, 2,072.7) 36 (15, 64) 195 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Washington County 6 Rural 1,944.7 (1,824.3, 2,070.9) 37 (16, 64) 196 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 1,937.0 (1,808.2, 2,072.5) 38 (14, 65) 169 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.3, 7.0)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 1,931.2 (1,893.5, 1,969.6) 39 (30, 55) 2,057 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 1,927.3 (1,639.6, 2,251.2) 40 (3, 75) 32 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.7)
Cotton County 6 Urban 1,923.9 (1,571.5, 2,332.1) 41 (2, 76) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.2)
Osage County 6 Urban 1,922.9 (1,796.8, 2,055.7) 42 (16, 66) 176 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Pushmataha County 6 Rural 1,921.5 (1,684.0, 2,183.3) 43 (4, 73) 47 stable stable trend 3.0 (-8.7, 16.9)
Carter County 6 Rural 1,920.5 (1,784.8, 2,063.7) 44 (16, 67) 151 falling falling trend -1.3 (-8.4, -0.1)
Canadian County 6 Urban 1,916.8 (1,828.8, 2,007.9) 45 (24, 62) 370 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 1,911.6 (1,762.6, 2,069.7) 46 (15, 68) 123 falling falling trend -8.6 (-13.8, -2.0)
Dewey County 6 Rural 1,905.4 (1,510.6, 2,372.5) 47 (1, 76) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Logan County 6 Urban 1,904.8 (1,766.9, 2,050.7) 48 (15, 69) 147 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Noble County 6 Rural 1,901.8 (1,653.6, 2,176.5) 49 (3, 74) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Roger Mills County 6 Rural 1,897.0 (1,473.8, 2,403.6) 50 (1, 76) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.4)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 1,893.1 (1,721.5, 2,077.2) 51 (14, 71) 90 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.6, 9.9)
Custer County 6 Rural 1,887.1 (1,698.4, 2,090.9) 52 (11, 73) 74 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Grant County 6 Rural 1,882.9 (1,496.5, 2,337.2) 53 (1, 76) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Beaver County 6 Rural 1,875.0 (1,511.9, 2,299.3) 54 (2, 76) 19 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.3, 18.3)
Atoka County 6 Rural 1,851.5 (1,622.9, 2,103.4) 55 (9, 75) 48 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.7)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 1,848.1 (1,743.9, 1,957.0) 56 (29, 70) 243 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Adair County 6 Rural 1,841.0 (1,631.2, 2,070.8) 57 (9, 74) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Bryan County 6 Rural 1,836.6 (1,705.8, 1,974.8) 58 (27, 71) 147 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 3.1)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 1,823.3 (1,763.2, 1,884.9) 59 (42, 68) 718 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Beckham County 6 Rural 1,823.0 (1,614.1, 2,051.4) 60 (13, 75) 57 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Haskell County 6 Rural 1,810.1 (1,573.2, 2,072.8) 61 (9, 76) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 1,767.6 (1,538.8, 2,020.8) 62 (15, 76) 44 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Love County 6 Rural 1,762.8 (1,501.5, 2,056.8) 63 (10, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Woodward County 6 Rural 1,762.1 (1,564.9, 1,977.4) 64 (21, 76) 58 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.4, 12.9)
Washita County 6 Rural 1,752.2 (1,497.5, 2,037.6) 65 (12, 76) 34 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Hughes County 6 Rural 1,749.5 (1,520.6, 2,003.0) 66 (14, 76) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Jackson County 6 Rural 1,739.2 (1,553.1, 1,941.4) 67 (26, 76) 64 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Tillman County 6 Rural 1,709.6 (1,414.9, 2,047.7) 68 (11, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 0.9)
Delaware County 6 Rural 1,678.9 (1,566.1, 1,797.7) 69 (49, 75) 168 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Greer County 6 Rural 1,662.2 (1,317.9, 2,067.9) 70 (6, 77) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.5)
Major County 6 Rural 1,653.8 (1,380.0, 1,965.7) 71 (16, 77) 26 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.0)
Murray County 6 Rural 1,610.4 (1,405.2, 1,837.3) 72 (33, 76) 45 falling falling trend -7.6 (-22.9, -2.3)
Texas County 6 Rural 1,558.2 (1,341.4, 1,800.4) 73 (42, 77) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Coal County 6 Rural 1,546.7 (1,227.8, 1,922.6) 74 (19, 77) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.6, -0.3)
Harmon County 6 Rural 1,545.6 (1,104.8, 2,106.0) 75 (4, 77) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 1.6)
Ellis County 6 Rural 1,471.3 (1,130.4, 1,883.3) 76 (20, 77) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.5)
Cimarron County 6 Rural 1,026.8 (686.4, 1,479.0) 77 (65, 77) 6 falling falling trend -13.9 (-34.3, -5.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 4:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top