Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 450.8 (448.0, 453.6) N/A 20,705 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Cimarron County 6 350.7 (251.4, 477.5) 77 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.9)
Harmon County 6 457.8 (361.9, 573.3) 31 (1, 77) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.9)
Roger Mills County 6 423.8 (342.2, 520.3) 59 (1, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Ellis County 6 364.4 (296.4, 445.1) 76 (14, 77) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.5)
Harper County 6 474.4 (391.2, 571.5) 16 (1, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Dewey County 6 416.4 (346.8, 496.9) 62 (1, 77) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Beaver County 6 367.1 (306.5, 437.2) 75 (17, 77) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Grant County 6 470.5 (391.4, 561.8) 21 (1, 76) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Coal County 6 387.1 (324.6, 459.1) 74 (10, 77) 30 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Cotton County 6 407.6 (346.8, 477.2) 68 (4, 77) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Greer County 6 475.5 (406.0, 554.0) 14 (1, 75) 35 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Alfalfa County 6 473.8 (408.7, 547.4) 17 (1, 75) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Jefferson County 6 446.3 (382.7, 518.2) 41 (1, 76) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Major County 6 401.7 (346.7, 463.4) 71 (8, 77) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Tillman County 6 444.9 (386.1, 510.8) 45 (1, 76) 45 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Woods County 6 455.7 (398.7, 518.9) 33 (1, 75) 50 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Washita County 6 411.1 (364.2, 462.6) 66 (10, 77) 60 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Blaine County 6 460.1 (407.5, 518.0) 29 (1, 73) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Kiowa County 6 509.7 (451.0, 574.5) 2 (1, 61) 61 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Love County 6 487.7 (434.0, 546.6) 9 (1, 69) 64 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.4)
Johnston County 6 433.2 (385.0, 486.1) 54 (3, 76) 64 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Noble County 6 441.3 (393.7, 493.4) 48 (2, 76) 68 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Nowata County 6 472.3 (422.1, 527.3) 20 (1, 73) 69 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Okfuskee County 6 463.8 (416.3, 515.5) 25 (1, 71) 73 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Atoka County 6 393.3 (352.7, 437.6) 72 (24, 77) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Latimer County 6 500.5 (448.0, 557.9) 4 (1, 62) 74 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Pushmataha County 6 452.5 (405.1, 504.4) 39 (1, 74) 76 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.3, 10.9)
Haskell County 6 438.4 (393.8, 486.9) 51 (4, 75) 77 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.8, 9.7)
Murray County 6 408.2 (367.2, 452.8) 67 (15, 77) 78 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Hughes County 6 454.4 (409.9, 502.8) 35 (2, 73) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Texas County 6 428.4 (387.6, 472.2) 57 (6, 76) 84 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Kingfisher County 6 499.3 (454.1, 548.0) 5 (1, 55) 94 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Woodward County 6 393.0 (357.8, 430.8) 73 (36, 77) 94 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Craig County 6 469.6 (427.1, 515.7) 22 (1, 70) 95 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Choctaw County 6 460.7 (418.6, 506.2) 27 (2, 72) 97 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Pawnee County 6 473.7 (432.9, 517.5) 18 (1, 66) 107 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Beckham County 6 441.4 (404.2, 481.1) 47 (6, 74) 108 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Marshall County 6 452.5 (413.9, 494.2) 38 (3, 72) 111 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Adair County 6 446.0 (409.7, 484.9) 42 (5, 72) 117 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.8)
Jackson County 6 432.4 (397.8, 469.2) 55 (9, 75) 120 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.6)
Custer County 6 413.3 (380.5, 448.2) 64 (24, 76) 124 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
McIntosh County 6 406.8 (373.9, 442.3) 69 (25, 77) 132 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Seminole County 6 429.0 (396.4, 463.7) 56 (12, 74) 136 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Caddo County 6 439.7 (408.9, 472.4) 49 (9, 73) 158 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Garvin County 6 457.2 (425.0, 491.4) 32 (4, 68) 159 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Ottawa County 6 478.0 (447.0, 510.7) 11 (1, 54) 190 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
McCurtain County 6 468.2 (438.5, 499.5) 24 (2, 60) 198 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Lincoln County 6 436.1 (408.7, 464.9) 52 (14, 72) 204 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Pontotoc County 6 475.6 (447.3, 505.3) 13 (2, 56) 220 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
McClain County 6 477.8 (449.4, 507.6) 12 (1, 53) 221 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Bryan County 6 418.4 (394.5, 443.4) 60 (30, 75) 243 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Logan County 6 445.6 (420.5, 471.8) 44 (11, 68) 251 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Cherokee County 6 454.8 (429.6, 481.2) 34 (7, 63) 258 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Okmulgee County 6 522.6 (493.7, 552.9) 1 (1, 18) 261 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Mayes County 6 494.0 (466.8, 522.5) 6 (1, 39) 266 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 5.1)
Pittsburg County 6 448.7 (424.1, 474.5) 40 (9, 66) 268 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Sequoyah County 6 503.2 (476.1, 531.7) 3 (1, 32) 272 rising rising trend 4.9 (0.5, 9.6)
Delaware County 6 406.2 (383.1, 430.6) 70 (40, 76) 272 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Carter County 6 452.9 (428.6, 478.3) 37 (9, 64) 273 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Osage County 6 412.8 (390.5, 436.3) 65 (36, 75) 277 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Stephens County 6 459.1 (434.2, 485.1) 30 (5, 61) 277 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Kay County 6 493.0 (466.9, 520.3) 7 (1, 37) 289 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Grady County 6 442.6 (419.9, 466.3) 46 (14, 68) 301 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Garfield County 6 413.4 (392.2, 435.4) 63 (37, 74) 303 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Le Flore County 6 474.9 (450.6, 500.3) 15 (3, 49) 303 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Payne County 6 416.9 (395.9, 438.8) 61 (34, 74) 311 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Washington County 6 453.6 (430.6, 477.6) 36 (8, 62) 318 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Pottawatomie County 6 462.0 (441.6, 483.1) 26 (7, 54) 402 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Muskogee County 6 481.6 (460.4, 503.6) 10 (2, 40) 409 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Wagoner County 6 426.6 (407.9, 446.0) 58 (29, 72) 413 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Creek County 6 490.2 (469.7, 511.4) 8 (1, 33) 455 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Rogers County 6 468.3 (450.2, 487.1) 23 (7, 48) 525 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Comanche County 6 460.7 (443.5, 478.4) 28 (9, 52) 562 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Canadian County 6 445.6 (430.2, 461.5) 43 (20, 62) 653 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Cleveland County 6 433.7 (422.8, 444.8) 53 (34, 64) 1,257 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Tulsa County 6 473.1 (465.8, 480.5) 19 (10, 33) 3,361 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Oklahoma County 6 438.9 (432.4, 445.4) 50 (34, 58) 3,680 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/31/2023 8:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top