Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 104.1 (102.2, 105.9) N/A 2,432 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 167.8 (118.0, 231.1) 1 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.8, 7.4)
Johnston County 6 Rural 162.1 (118.4, 216.1) 2 (1, 52) 9 rising rising trend 19.3 (2.2, 49.5)
Grant County 6 Rural 161.8 (93.7, 258.6) 3 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Coal County 6 Rural 150.8 (94.1, 228.5) 4 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Washita County 6 Rural 146.2 (106.0, 196.1) 5 (1, 62) 9 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.4, 11.6)
Mayes County 6 Rural 132.6 (112.0, 155.8) 6 (1, 45) 30 stable stable trend 2.3 (-12.1, 13.1)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 132.1 (100.2, 170.7) 7 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 4.8)
Tillman County 6 Rural 131.0 (84.7, 193.2) 8 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 8.4)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 129.9 (106.8, 156.5) 9 (1, 54) 22 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Garvin County 6 Rural 125.3 (101.0, 153.4) 11 (2, 59) 19 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.1)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 125.1 (102.0, 151.8) 10 (2, 57) 21 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 5.0)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 124.9 (104.9, 147.4) 12 (3, 55) 28 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.5)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 123.7 (93.1, 161.0) 15 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.9, 5.4)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 122.8 (102.2, 146.3) 13 (2, 57) 25 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 3.7)
Pushmataha County 6 Rural 121.9 (84.3, 170.2) 16 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.1, 4.3)
Haskell County 6 Rural 120.9 (85.9, 165.0) 14 (1, 66) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.1)
Adair County 6 Rural 119.9 (93.0, 152.0) 17 (2, 64) 14 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.5)
McClain County 6 Urban 118.6 (100.5, 139.1) 18 (4, 56) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 118.4 (67.6, 191.0) 19 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural 117.0 (84.6, 157.4) 21 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.2)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 116.9 (98.9, 137.1) 20 (4, 58) 31 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 3.7)
Kay County 6 Rural 116.1 (97.5, 137.1) 22 (4, 58) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.6)
Nowata County 6 Rural 114.5 (77.0, 163.4) 24 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.4, 5.0)
Washington County 6 Rural 114.4 (97.5, 133.2) 23 (5, 58) 33 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.8)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 113.7 (95.5, 134.1) 26 (5, 60) 28 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 2.9)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 113.4 (98.8, 129.5) 25 (6, 56) 44 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Rogers County 6 Urban 112.4 (100.3, 125.6) 27 (7, 53) 63 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 110.7 (97.1, 125.7) 29 (8, 58) 48 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Payne County 6 Rural 110.7 (96.2, 126.6) 30 (8, 59) 44 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Latimer County 6 Rural 110.5 (72.6, 160.5) 31 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-4.1, 6.7)
Stephens County 6 Rural 110.1 (92.1, 130.7) 33 (6, 63) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.7)
Creek County 6 Urban 110.1 (96.2, 125.5) 34 (9, 60) 45 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 109.8 (82.1, 143.8) 28 (2, 66) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.6)
Delaware County 6 Rural 108.0 (88.7, 130.1) 35 (5, 64) 22 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Hughes County 6 Rural 107.9 (77.9, 145.6) 32 (2, 66) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.4)
Grady County 6 Urban 107.6 (92.3, 124.7) 37 (8, 62) 35 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 107.4 (102.9, 112.0) 36 (22, 48) 437 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 0.9)
Bryan County 6 Rural 106.3 (89.2, 125.6) 38 (8, 63) 28 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.1)
Comanche County 6 Urban 106.2 (95.7, 117.5) 39 (14, 59) 77 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.7)
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 104.6 (73.1, 144.9) 41 (3, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.0, 8.4)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 104.4 (88.1, 122.9) 40 (9, 63) 29 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 103.1 (90.8, 116.7) 42 (15, 62) 50 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.7)
Carter County 6 Rural 102.4 (86.3, 120.5) 43 (10, 64) 29 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 2.9)
Noble County 6 Rural 102.2 (69.4, 145.1) 45 (3, 67) 6 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.0, 9.2)
Texas County 6 Rural 101.5 (78.6, 128.8) 47 (5, 66) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.5, 4.8)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 101.5 (83.3, 122.4) 44 (9, 65) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.7)
Craig County 6 Rural 100.5 (71.7, 136.9) 49 (3, 67) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.0)
Jackson County 6 Rural 99.6 (77.3, 126.0) 48 (7, 66) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-10.1, 0.0)
Atoka County 6 Rural 99.2 (71.6, 133.8) 46 (3, 67) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.4)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 99.0 (79.7, 121.4) 51 (8, 66) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.4)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 98.6 (94.6, 102.6) 52 (35, 58) 477 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Canadian County 6 Urban 98.4 (89.8, 107.6) 50 (26, 61) 96 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Beckham County 6 Rural 96.5 (74.6, 122.7) 53 (8, 67) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 9.6)
Seminole County 6 Rural 95.2 (73.0, 121.8) 54 (7, 67) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.1)
Caddo County 6 Rural 93.4 (73.8, 116.5) 56 (12, 67) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.6, 2.9)
Garfield County 6 Urban 93.4 (79.5, 108.9) 55 (20, 65) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 91.8 (85.6, 98.4) 57 (39, 64) 163 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Major County 6 Rural 91.1 (54.7, 142.1) 58 (3, 67) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.6, 6.3)
Logan County 6 Urban 91.1 (76.4, 107.9) 59 (23, 66) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Murray County 6 Rural 90.3 (62.8, 125.7) 61 (7, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.3)
Blaine County 6 Rural 89.0 (55.6, 134.9) 62 (3, 67) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.3, 5.3)
Osage County 6 Urban 88.9 (73.1, 106.9) 60 (18, 67) 22 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.1)
Woods County 6 Rural 88.1 (52.7, 137.1) 63 (3, 67) 4
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural 82.1 (62.8, 105.0) 64 (20, 67) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.0)
Marshall County 6 Rural 80.4 (55.2, 112.9) 65 (14, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.8, 4.3)
Love County 6 Rural 74.5 (46.5, 112.9) 66 (14, 67) 4 falling falling trend -4.4 (-28.4, -0.6)
Woodward County 6 Rural 63.7 (45.4, 86.7) 67 (42, 67) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.6)
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 6:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alfalfa, Beaver, Cimarron, Cotton, Dewey, Ellis, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Roger Mills

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top