Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oklahoma 6 | N/A | 104.1 (102.2, 105.9) | N/A | 2,432 | stable | 0.5 (0.0, 0.9) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) | N/A | 205,200 | stable | 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2) |
Kiowa County 6 | Rural | 167.8 (118.0, 231.1) | 1 (1, 56) | 7 | stable | 3.1 (-0.8, 7.4) |
Johnston County 6 | Rural | 162.1 (118.4, 216.1) | 2 (1, 52) | 9 | rising | 19.3 (2.2, 49.5) |
Grant County 6 | Rural | 161.8 (93.7, 258.6) | 3 (1, 67) | 3 |
|
|
Coal County 6 | Rural | 150.8 (94.1, 228.5) | 4 (1, 67) | 4 |
|
|
Washita County 6 | Rural | 146.2 (106.0, 196.1) | 5 (1, 62) | 9 | rising | 6.3 (1.4, 11.6) |
Mayes County 6 | Rural | 132.6 (112.0, 155.8) | 6 (1, 45) | 30 | stable | 2.3 (-12.1, 13.1) |
Kingfisher County 6 | Rural | 132.1 (100.2, 170.7) | 7 (1, 62) | 12 | stable | 2.1 (-0.5, 4.8) |
Tillman County 6 | Rural | 131.0 (84.7, 193.2) | 8 (1, 67) | 5 | stable | 3.5 (-0.8, 8.4) |
McCurtain County 6 | Rural | 129.9 (106.8, 156.5) | 9 (1, 54) | 22 | stable | 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5) |
Garvin County 6 | Rural | 125.3 (101.0, 153.4) | 11 (2, 59) | 19 | stable | 0.4 (-2.3, 3.1) |
Ottawa County 6 | Rural | 125.1 (102.0, 151.8) | 10 (2, 57) | 21 | stable | 2.2 (-0.3, 5.0) |
Sequoyah County 6 | Urban | 124.9 (104.9, 147.4) | 12 (3, 55) | 28 | stable | 0.8 (-1.0, 2.5) |
Pawnee County 6 | Urban | 123.7 (93.1, 161.0) | 15 (1, 64) | 11 | stable | 2.2 (-0.9, 5.4) |
Okmulgee County 6 | Urban | 122.8 (102.2, 146.3) | 13 (2, 57) | 25 | stable | 1.4 (-1.0, 3.7) |
Pushmataha County 6 | Rural | 121.9 (84.3, 170.2) | 16 (1, 67) | 7 | stable | 0.2 (-4.1, 4.3) |
Haskell County 6 | Rural | 120.9 (85.9, 165.0) | 14 (1, 66) | 8 | stable | 0.9 (-3.2, 5.1) |
Adair County 6 | Rural | 119.9 (93.0, 152.0) | 17 (2, 64) | 14 | stable | 1.3 (-1.0, 3.5) |
McClain County 6 | Urban | 118.6 (100.5, 139.1) | 18 (4, 56) | 30 | stable | 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1) |
Jefferson County 6 | Rural | 118.4 (67.6, 191.0) | 19 (1, 67) | 3 |
|
|
Choctaw County 6 | Rural | 117.0 (84.6, 157.4) | 21 (1, 66) | 9 | stable | -0.5 (-3.2, 2.2) |
Cherokee County 6 | Rural | 116.9 (98.9, 137.1) | 20 (4, 58) | 31 | rising | 2.0 (0.3, 3.7) |
Kay County 6 | Rural | 116.1 (97.5, 137.1) | 22 (4, 58) | 28 | stable | 1.2 (-1.3, 3.6) |
Nowata County 6 | Rural | 114.5 (77.0, 163.4) | 24 (1, 67) | 6 | stable | 1.2 (-2.4, 5.0) |
Washington County 6 | Rural | 114.4 (97.5, 133.2) | 23 (5, 58) | 33 | stable | 0.2 (-1.5, 1.8) |
Pittsburg County 6 | Rural | 113.7 (95.5, 134.1) | 26 (5, 60) | 28 | rising | 1.5 (0.1, 2.9) |
Muskogee County 6 | Rural | 113.4 (98.8, 129.5) | 25 (6, 56) | 44 | stable | 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4) |
Rogers County 6 | Urban | 112.4 (100.3, 125.6) | 27 (7, 53) | 63 | stable | 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7) |
Pottawatomie County 6 | Rural | 110.7 (97.1, 125.7) | 29 (8, 58) | 48 | stable | 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8) |
Payne County 6 | Rural | 110.7 (96.2, 126.6) | 30 (8, 59) | 44 | stable | 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0) |
Latimer County 6 | Rural | 110.5 (72.6, 160.5) | 31 (1, 67) | 5 | stable | 1.5 (-4.1, 6.7) |
Stephens County 6 | Rural | 110.1 (92.1, 130.7) | 33 (6, 63) | 26 | stable | 1.1 (-0.5, 2.7) |
Creek County 6 | Urban | 110.1 (96.2, 125.5) | 34 (9, 60) | 45 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0) |
McIntosh County 6 | Rural | 109.8 (82.1, 143.8) | 28 (2, 66) | 11 | stable | 0.3 (-2.9, 3.6) |
Delaware County 6 | Rural | 108.0 (88.7, 130.1) | 35 (5, 64) | 22 | stable | 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8) |
Hughes County 6 | Rural | 107.9 (77.9, 145.6) | 32 (2, 66) | 9 | stable | -1.3 (-4.2, 1.4) |
Grady County 6 | Urban | 107.6 (92.3, 124.7) | 37 (8, 62) | 35 | stable | 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3) |
Tulsa County 6 | Urban | 107.4 (102.9, 112.0) | 36 (22, 48) | 437 | stable | 0.4 (-1.4, 0.9) |
Bryan County 6 | Rural | 106.3 (89.2, 125.6) | 38 (8, 63) | 28 | rising | 1.7 (0.4, 3.1) |
Comanche County 6 | Urban | 106.2 (95.7, 117.5) | 39 (14, 59) | 77 | stable | 1.2 (-0.2, 2.7) |
Okfuskee County 6 | Rural | 104.6 (73.1, 144.9) | 41 (3, 67) | 7 | stable | 2.7 (-3.0, 8.4) |
Le Flore County 6 | Rural | 104.4 (88.1, 122.9) | 40 (9, 63) | 29 | stable | 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4) |
Wagoner County 6 | Urban | 103.1 (90.8, 116.7) | 42 (15, 62) | 50 | stable | 0.5 (-0.8, 1.7) |
Carter County 6 | Rural | 102.4 (86.3, 120.5) | 43 (10, 64) | 29 | stable | 0.9 (-1.2, 2.9) |
Noble County 6 | Rural | 102.2 (69.4, 145.1) | 45 (3, 67) | 6 | stable | 3.7 (-1.0, 9.2) |
Texas County 6 | Rural | 101.5 (78.6, 128.8) | 47 (5, 66) | 14 | stable | 1.0 (-2.5, 4.8) |
Pontotoc County 6 | Rural | 101.5 (83.3, 122.4) | 44 (9, 65) | 22 | stable | -0.5 (-2.8, 1.7) |
Craig County 6 | Rural | 100.5 (71.7, 136.9) | 49 (3, 67) | 8 | stable | -1.4 (-5.3, 2.0) |
Jackson County 6 | Rural | 99.6 (77.3, 126.0) | 48 (7, 66) | 14 | stable | -1.6 (-10.1, 0.0) |
Atoka County 6 | Rural | 99.2 (71.6, 133.8) | 46 (3, 67) | 9 | stable | 0.5 (-2.5, 3.4) |
Lincoln County 6 | Urban | 99.0 (79.7, 121.4) | 51 (8, 66) | 18 | stable | 1.2 (-0.8, 3.4) |
Oklahoma County 6 | Urban | 98.6 (94.6, 102.6) | 52 (35, 58) | 477 | stable | -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6) |
Canadian County 6 | Urban | 98.4 (89.8, 107.6) | 50 (26, 61) | 96 | stable | -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4) |
Beckham County 6 | Rural | 96.5 (74.6, 122.7) | 53 (8, 67) | 13 | stable | 1.0 (-1.7, 9.6) |
Seminole County 6 | Rural | 95.2 (73.0, 121.8) | 54 (7, 67) | 13 | stable | 0.3 (-1.6, 2.1) |
Caddo County 6 | Rural | 93.4 (73.8, 116.5) | 56 (12, 67) | 16 | stable | 0.2 (-2.6, 2.9) |
Garfield County 6 | Urban | 93.4 (79.5, 108.9) | 55 (20, 65) | 33 | stable | -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4) |
Cleveland County 6 | Urban | 91.8 (85.6, 98.4) | 57 (39, 64) | 163 | stable | -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3) |
Major County 6 | Rural | 91.1 (54.7, 142.1) | 58 (3, 67) | 4 | stable | 0.1 (-6.6, 6.3) |
Logan County 6 | Urban | 91.1 (76.4, 107.9) | 59 (23, 66) | 27 | stable | 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4) |
Murray County 6 | Rural | 90.3 (62.8, 125.7) | 61 (7, 67) | 7 | stable | -0.9 (-4.0, 2.3) |
Blaine County 6 | Rural | 89.0 (55.6, 134.9) | 62 (3, 67) | 4 | stable | 1.6 (-2.3, 5.3) |
Osage County 6 | Urban | 88.9 (73.1, 106.9) | 60 (18, 67) | 22 | stable | 0.5 (-2.1, 3.1) |
Woods County 6 | Rural | 88.1 (52.7, 137.1) | 63 (3, 67) | 4 |
|
|
Custer County 6 | Rural | 82.1 (62.8, 105.0) | 64 (20, 67) | 13 | stable | -0.9 (-3.8, 2.0) |
Marshall County 6 | Rural | 80.4 (55.2, 112.9) | 65 (14, 67) | 7 | stable | 0.2 (-3.8, 4.3) |
Love County 6 | Rural | 74.5 (46.5, 112.9) | 66 (14, 67) | 4 | falling | -4.4 (-28.4, -0.6) |
Woodward County 6 | Rural | 63.7 (45.4, 86.7) | 67 (42, 67) | 8 | stable | -1.3 (-5.3, 2.6) |
Alfalfa County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Beaver County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Cimarron County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Cotton County 6 | Urban |
|
|
|
|
|
Dewey County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Ellis County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Greer County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Harmon County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Harper County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Mills County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 6:47 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alfalfa, Beaver, Cimarron, Cotton, Dewey, Ellis, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Roger Mills
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 6:47 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alfalfa, Beaver, Cimarron, Cotton, Dewey, Ellis, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Roger Mills
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.