Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 1,358.8 (1,349.9, 1,367.7) N/A 18,458 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,338.1 (1,337.2, 1,339.1) N/A 1,538,303 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 1,617.1 (1,479.9, 1,763.7) 1 (1, 32) 105 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 2.0)
Latimer County 6 Rural 1,592.5 (1,421.9, 1,777.9) 2 (1, 48) 65 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.6)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 1,562.4 (1,471.2, 1,657.9) 3 (1, 28) 225 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.5)
Nowata County 6 Rural 1,560.0 (1,390.6, 1,744.5) 4 (1, 53) 63 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Harper County 6 Rural 1,559.2 (1,273.4, 1,890.4) 5 (1, 74) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Alfalfa County 6 Rural 1,558.0 (1,337.1, 1,805.1) 6 (1, 68) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.8)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 1,556.8 (1,469.3, 1,648.3) 7 (1, 28) 241 stable stable trend -1.1 (-8.3, 4.9)
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 1,543.8 (1,383.8, 1,717.5) 8 (1, 57) 69 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Mayes County 6 Rural 1,539.6 (1,452.1, 1,631.1) 9 (1, 32) 239 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 7.0)
Caddo County 6 Rural 1,527.3 (1,416.4, 1,644.5) 10 (1, 43) 143 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.6)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 1,524.2 (1,425.4, 1,628.1) 11 (1, 39) 181 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.5)
Creek County 6 Urban 1,523.7 (1,458.9, 1,590.8) 12 (1, 27) 426 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Dewey County 6 Rural 1,519.1 (1,270.2, 1,802.5) 13 (1, 72) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.2)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 1,482.5 (1,400.2, 1,568.4) 14 (2, 44) 250 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 1,474.2 (1,405.9, 1,544.9) 15 (4, 40) 361 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Kay County 6 Rural 1,472.0 (1,391.6, 1,555.9) 16 (3, 45) 258 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 2.9)
Johnston County 6 Rural 1,466.5 (1,303.6, 1,644.4) 17 (1, 68) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Craig County 6 Rural 1,459.7 (1,324.1, 1,605.4) 18 (1, 64) 86 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Woods County 6 Rural 1,459.6 (1,271.1, 1,668.1) 19 (1, 72) 45 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 1,458.4 (1,361.2, 1,560.7) 20 (3, 56) 172 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 1,457.7 (1,323.9, 1,601.4) 21 (1, 66) 90 stable stable trend 0.5 (-5.1, 6.9)
Blaine County 6 Rural 1,454.4 (1,281.9, 1,643.7) 22 (1, 69) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 1,449.0 (1,382.7, 1,517.7) 23 (6, 44) 369 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 1,442.4 (1,230.6, 1,680.7) 24 (1, 74) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 1,437.0 (1,347.5, 1,531.0) 25 (4, 58) 198 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.5, 6.1)
Stephens County 6 Rural 1,413.2 (1,335.4, 1,494.3) 26 (7, 57) 256 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Payne County 6 Rural 1,403.4 (1,332.8, 1,476.8) 27 (11, 56) 305 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 1,396.1 (1,373.4, 1,419.1) 28 (21, 44) 2,984 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Noble County 6 Rural 1,391.8 (1,241.7, 1,555.0) 29 (2, 72) 64 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.4)
McClain County 6 Urban 1,391.6 (1,303.9, 1,483.7) 30 (9, 62) 195 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Garvin County 6 Rural 1,390.0 (1,285.3, 1,501.0) 31 (6, 68) 135 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Comanche County 6 Urban 1,387.6 (1,332.3, 1,444.5) 32 (16, 56) 492 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Marshall County 6 Rural 1,387.1 (1,263.3, 1,519.8) 33 (4, 69) 95 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 1,378.3 (1,302.0, 1,457.8) 34 (12, 62) 251 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.2, 8.6)
Seminole County 6 Rural 1,377.3 (1,271.7, 1,489.4) 35 (7, 69) 128 stable stable trend 4.8 (-1.1, 8.9)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 1,376.9 (1,289.6, 1,468.7) 36 (10, 65) 189 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Haskell County 6 Rural 1,367.4 (1,222.6, 1,524.8) 37 (3, 72) 67 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.5)
Rogers County 6 Urban 1,360.0 (1,304.6, 1,417.0) 38 (20, 60) 468 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Roger Mills County 6 Rural 1,359.3 (1,099.6, 1,661.6) 39 (1, 76) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Pushmataha County 6 Rural 1,356.7 (1,214.9, 1,510.6) 40 (4, 73) 69 stable stable trend -5.6 (-15.6, 3.5)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 1,349.0 (1,245.3, 1,459.2) 41 (11, 70) 131 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 1,346.8 (1,276.9, 1,419.6) 42 (18, 65) 287 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Custer County 6 Rural 1,344.4 (1,235.8, 1,460.1) 43 (9, 71) 117 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 1,341.8 (1,266.8, 1,420.1) 44 (18, 66) 246 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Grady County 6 Urban 1,339.8 (1,268.1, 1,414.6) 45 (19, 67) 271 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Kiowa County 6 Rural 1,331.0 (1,166.0, 1,512.9) 46 (4, 76) 49 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Osage County 6 Urban 1,329.3 (1,257.7, 1,404.0) 47 (21, 68) 266 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Garfield County 6 Urban 1,326.3 (1,258.2, 1,397.3) 48 (23, 67) 292 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Beckham County 6 Rural 1,322.8 (1,204.0, 1,450.2) 49 (10, 73) 95 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 1,317.9 (1,183.2, 1,463.8) 50 (7, 74) 72 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Grant County 6 Rural 1,314.5 (1,083.3, 1,580.0) 51 (1, 76) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Carter County 6 Rural 1,313.1 (1,237.5, 1,392.2) 52 (22, 70) 231 falling falling trend -1.6 (-7.8, -0.1)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 1,309.7 (1,289.0, 1,330.6) 53 (40, 61) 3,195 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.7)
Adair County 6 Rural 1,306.9 (1,188.5, 1,434.2) 54 (12, 73) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.4)
Greer County 6 Rural 1,304.8 (1,090.1, 1,549.1) 55 (1, 76) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.0)
Bryan County 6 Rural 1,301.4 (1,224.8, 1,381.5) 56 (24, 71) 220 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Canadian County 6 Urban 1,297.7 (1,250.0, 1,346.7) 57 (34, 68) 584 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Logan County 6 Urban 1,295.5 (1,219.9, 1,374.7) 58 (23, 71) 230 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Hughes County 6 Rural 1,292.4 (1,155.3, 1,441.4) 59 (9, 75) 66 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Cotton County 6 Urban 1,289.2 (1,092.2, 1,511.7) 60 (2, 76) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 1,281.4 (1,222.9, 1,342.1) 61 (34, 71) 374 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Atoka County 6 Rural 1,277.8 (1,145.9, 1,420.8) 62 (13, 76) 70 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 1,254.4 (1,221.1, 1,288.3) 63 (50, 70) 1,118 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
Washita County 6 Rural 1,244.2 (1,097.3, 1,405.4) 64 (12, 76) 54 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.5)
Tillman County 6 Rural 1,237.0 (1,063.0, 1,431.6) 65 (9, 76) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Beaver County 6 Rural 1,229.8 (1,025.2, 1,463.6) 66 (3, 76) 26 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.7, 8.8)
Delaware County 6 Rural 1,218.8 (1,149.9, 1,290.8) 67 (46, 75) 247 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 1,207.9 (1,102.5, 1,320.7) 68 (33, 76) 99 stable stable trend -1.9 (-11.1, 0.0)
Harmon County 6 Rural 1,195.6 (920.4, 1,528.7) 69 (1, 77) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
Coal County 6 Rural 1,185.4 (987.8, 1,410.9) 70 (10, 76) 26 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.2)
Love County 6 Rural 1,176.2 (1,027.9, 1,340.1) 71 (23, 76) 47 falling falling trend -12.1 (-22.8, -3.7)
Major County 6 Rural 1,155.8 (992.9, 1,337.9) 72 (23, 76) 38 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Woodward County 6 Rural 1,152.0 (1,042.2, 1,270.1) 73 (46, 76) 82 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Ellis County 6 Rural 1,145.5 (924.6, 1,403.5) 74 (11, 77) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.4)
Murray County 6 Rural 1,118.3 (997.8, 1,249.4) 75 (47, 76) 65 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Texas County 6 Rural 1,102.3 (983.4, 1,231.7) 76 (53, 76) 66 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Cimarron County 6 Rural 681.7 (482.8, 939.7) 77 (74, 77) 8 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 8:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top