Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 *** 1,973.4 (1,957.1, 1,989.8) N/A 11,468 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 1,975.9 (1,974.1, 1,977.7) N/A 952,920 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Okmulgee County 6 *** 2,358.3 (2,197.7, 2,527.7) 1 (1, 16) 162 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Love County 6 *** 2,351.9 (2,042.8, 2,694.7) 2 (1, 50) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.5)
Harper County 6 *** 2,346.3 (1,858.7, 2,921.5) 3 (1, 74) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Harmon County 6 *** 2,244.2 (1,697.6, 2,908.9) 4 (1, 76) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.3)
Alfalfa County 6 *** 2,226.8 (1,848.0, 2,660.0) 5 (1, 72) 24 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.0)
McClain County 6 *** 2,154.0 (1,984.3, 2,334.4) 6 (1, 48) 123 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Pontotoc County 6 *** 2,145.5 (1,984.1, 2,316.5) 7 (1, 48) 132 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Sequoyah County 6 *** 2,113.9 (1,965.2, 2,270.9) 8 (2, 49) 154 rising rising trend 8.5 (1.7, 15.7)
Caddo County 6 *** 2,108.6 (1,926.4, 2,303.5) 9 (1, 56) 99 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Creek County 6 *** 2,103.5 (1,988.1, 2,223.9) 10 (3, 45) 253 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Mayes County 6 *** 2,103.1 (1,954.5, 2,260.1) 11 (2, 50) 152 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Tulsa County 6 *** 2,102.2 (2,058.5, 2,146.6) 12 (6, 26) 1,807 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Kingfisher County 6 *** 2,101.9 (1,850.3, 2,378.1) 13 (1, 68) 51 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Kiowa County 6 *** 2,091.4 (1,793.8, 2,424.4) 14 (1, 73) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Logan County 6 *** 2,079.8 (1,925.5, 2,243.2) 15 (2, 55) 139 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Nowata County 6 *** 2,071.5 (1,797.0, 2,376.0) 16 (1, 72) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Kay County 6 *** 2,069.1 (1,931.8, 2,213.4) 17 (3, 53) 171 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Muskogee County 6 *** 2,066.5 (1,948.1, 2,190.2) 18 (4, 49) 231 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Rogers County 6 *** 2,047.4 (1,941.6, 2,157.5) 19 (5, 48) 287 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Comanche County 6 *** 2,041.9 (1,937.9, 2,150.1) 20 (5, 48) 293 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Le Flore County 6 *** 2,035.3 (1,900.3, 2,177.3) 21 (4, 56) 173 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Tillman County 6 *** 2,018.8 (1,702.4, 2,377.1) 22 (1, 75) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Choctaw County 6 *** 2,017.6 (1,793.2, 2,262.4) 23 (2, 71) 59 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Craig County 6 *** 2,000.2 (1,771.8, 2,250.0) 24 (2, 72) 56 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Grant County 6 *** 1,990.3 (1,599.8, 2,446.2) 25 (1, 77) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.7)
Okfuskee County 6 *** 1,986.0 (1,721.1, 2,280.5) 26 (1, 74) 41 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Oklahoma County 6 *** 1,975.6 (1,936.3, 2,015.5) 27 (19, 46) 1,977 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Pottawatomie County 6 *** 1,975.5 (1,860.2, 2,096.2) 28 (7, 61) 223 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Carter County 6 *** 1,974.7 (1,836.6, 2,120.5) 29 (6, 64) 153 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Pawnee County 6 *** 1,970.1 (1,749.3, 2,211.1) 30 (2, 73) 59 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Canadian County 6 *** 1,968.7 (1,873.2, 2,067.9) 31 (10, 57) 330 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Cherokee County 6 *** 1,968.2 (1,827.3, 2,117.1) 32 (6, 66) 148 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Blaine County 6 *** 1,965.6 (1,685.1, 2,279.4) 33 (1, 76) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Cleveland County 6 *** 1,962.7 (1,895.3, 2,031.7) 34 (16, 53) 665 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Johnston County 6 *** 1,959.8 (1,696.1, 2,252.9) 35 (2, 75) 40 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Latimer County 6 *** 1,955.8 (1,701.7, 2,237.1) 36 (2, 74) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Grady County 6 *** 1,954.1 (1,821.0, 2,094.4) 37 (6, 65) 164 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Woods County 6 *** 1,953.8 (1,647.2, 2,300.4) 38 (1, 76) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Stephens County 6 *** 1,947.9 (1,814.7, 2,088.3) 39 (7, 64) 160 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Greer County 6 *** 1,943.3 (1,579.6, 2,364.6) 40 (1, 77) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.3)
Marshall County 6 *** 1,935.4 (1,734.0, 2,153.8) 41 (4, 72) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Jackson County 6 *** 1,928.1 (1,728.6, 2,144.3) 42 (4, 72) 69 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Hughes County 6 *** 1,925.8 (1,685.4, 2,190.7) 43 (3, 75) 47 falling falling trend -14.4 (-25.2, -2.1)
Garvin County 6 *** 1,921.0 (1,749.2, 2,105.1) 44 (6, 73) 92 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Murray County 6 *** 1,918.8 (1,687.5, 2,173.0) 45 (3, 75) 50 falling falling trend -13.0 (-21.7, -3.4)
Ottawa County 6 *** 1,911.1 (1,751.5, 2,081.3) 46 (7, 71) 107 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Texas County 6 *** 1,901.6 (1,653.5, 2,176.6) 47 (3, 76) 43 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.9)
Jefferson County 6 *** 1,900.9 (1,575.4, 2,274.3) 48 (1, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.3)
Washington County 6 *** 1,882.9 (1,762.7, 2,009.1) 49 (16, 69) 185 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Beckham County 6 *** 1,869.7 (1,653.4, 2,106.2) 50 (5, 76) 55 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.5)
Pushmataha County 6 *** 1,853.0 (1,619.9, 2,110.4) 51 (5, 76) 46 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.0)
Lincoln County 6 *** 1,851.1 (1,700.3, 2,011.9) 52 (13, 73) 113 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.5)
Wagoner County 6 *** 1,841.7 (1,732.0, 1,956.7) 53 (24, 71) 220 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Noble County 6 *** 1,835.8 (1,586.4, 2,113.3) 54 (4, 76) 39 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Seminole County 6 *** 1,834.0 (1,656.5, 2,025.3) 55 (12, 75) 79 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Adair County 6 *** 1,826.2 (1,624.6, 2,046.3) 56 (7, 76) 62 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Washita County 6 *** 1,823.0 (1,563.4, 2,113.2) 57 (4, 77) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Pittsburg County 6 *** 1,821.0 (1,694.5, 1,954.4) 58 (22, 74) 155 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Garfield County 6 *** 1,806.4 (1,687.0, 1,932.0) 59 (27, 73) 173 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.8)
McCurtain County 6 *** 1,805.2 (1,652.3, 1,968.5) 60 (18, 74) 104 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.2)
Osage County 6 *** 1,797.4 (1,673.0, 1,928.6) 61 (25, 74) 159 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Haskell County 6 *** 1,795.6 (1,565.7, 2,050.0) 62 (7, 76) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Woodward County 6 *** 1,790.2 (1,586.0, 2,013.6) 63 (10, 76) 56 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
Custer County 6 *** 1,767.3 (1,582.7, 1,967.4) 64 (16, 76) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Atoka County 6 *** 1,761.9 (1,539.3, 2,007.7) 65 (8, 77) 46 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Bryan County 6 *** 1,759.9 (1,631.3, 1,895.9) 66 (31, 75) 141 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Cotton County 6 *** 1,759.5 (1,431.4, 2,141.0) 67 (3, 77) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Major County 6 *** 1,738.2 (1,453.6, 2,062.1) 68 (6, 77) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.6)
Cimarron County 6 *** 1,706.2 (1,238.2, 2,293.9) 69 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.2)
Delaware County 6 *** 1,698.1 (1,584.8, 1,817.4) 70 (44, 76) 172 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
McIntosh County 6 *** 1,682.3 (1,522.5, 1,854.5) 71 (36, 77) 82 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Payne County 6 *** 1,675.5 (1,560.5, 1,796.7) 72 (48, 76) 160 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3)
Ellis County 6 *** 1,610.3 (1,249.7, 2,042.5) 73 (5, 77) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 1.0)
Dewey County 6 *** 1,576.9 (1,238.0, 1,980.1) 74 (7, 77) 15 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.0)
Beaver County 6 *** 1,519.5 (1,192.6, 1,908.2) 75 (14, 77) 15 stable stable trend 10.7 (-1.4, 24.2)
Roger Mills County 6 *** 1,500.4 (1,124.6, 1,961.3) 76 (7, 77) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 1.1)
Coal County 6 *** 1,462.3 (1,159.8, 1,818.9) 77 (29, 77) 16 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.5, -1.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/19/2021 10:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top