Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 13.5 (13.0, 14.0) N/A 635 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Logan County 6 Urban 8.0 (5.2, 12.0) 42 (29, 42) 5
*
*
Garfield County 6 Urban 10.5 (7.4, 14.5) 41 (15, 42) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.0, 5.9)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 11.0 (10.0, 12.1) 40 (30, 42) 95 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 11.8 (7.6, 17.7) 39 (5, 42) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.7, 3.4)
Delaware County 6 Rural 12.2 (8.6, 17.1) 38 (7, 42) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.7)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 12.5 (10.8, 14.4) 37 (17, 41) 40 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.6)
Canadian County 6 Urban 12.7 (10.3, 15.5) 36 (12, 41) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.7)
Osage County 6 Urban 12.9 (9.4, 17.5) 35 (6, 42) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.5)
Jackson County 6 Rural 13.0 (7.7, 20.6) 34 (2, 42) 4
*
*
Cherokee County 6 Rural 13.2 (9.2, 18.3) 33 (4, 42) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.1)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 13.3 (10.2, 17.0) 32 (7, 41) 13 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.9, 5.6)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 13.4 (9.6, 18.5) 31 (4, 42) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.2, 5.3)
Beckham County 6 Rural 13.4 (7.8, 21.7) 30 (2, 42) 4 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.6, 9.4)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 13.5 (12.3, 14.8) 29 (16, 36) 100 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 13.6 (10.4, 17.6) 28 (6, 41) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.6, 4.9)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 13.6 (9.6, 18.9) 27 (4, 42) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.7, 5.8)
Caddo County 6 Rural 13.9 (8.8, 21.1) 26 (2, 42) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.6, 5.5)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 13.9 (8.4, 22.4) 25 (2, 42) 4
*
*
McCurtain County 6 Rural 14.3 (9.4, 21.1) 24 (2, 42) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 6.0)
Grady County 6 Urban 14.3 (10.6, 19.1) 23 (4, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.3)
Comanche County 6 Urban 14.4 (11.5, 17.8) 22 (5, 40) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.0)
Payne County 6 Rural 14.8 (11.1, 19.4) 21 (3, 41) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.8, 7.7)
Stephens County 6 Rural 14.9 (10.7, 20.3) 20 (2, 41) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.6)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 15.0 (8.2, 25.6) 19 (1, 42) 3 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.2, 7.9)
Kay County 6 Rural 15.1 (11.0, 20.5) 18 (2, 41) 9
*
*
Washington County 6 Rural 15.2 (11.4, 20.1) 17 (2, 40) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 4.1)
Rogers County 6 Urban 15.5 (12.5, 19.0) 16 (3, 38) 20 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.1, 8.1)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 15.5 (10.9, 21.5) 15 (2, 41) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.8)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 15.8 (10.5, 22.8) 14 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 4.6)
McClain County 6 Urban 15.8 (11.2, 21.8) 13 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.7)
Mayes County 6 Rural 16.3 (11.6, 22.3) 12 (2, 41) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.7)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 16.6 (11.7, 23.0) 11 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.2)
Creek County 6 Urban 16.7 (13.1, 21.1) 10 (2, 37) 16 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.6, 7.4)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 17.4 (12.2, 24.3) 9 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.1, 6.2)
Seminole County 6 Rural 17.7 (11.8, 25.9) 8 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.3, 5.1)
Garvin County 6 Rural 17.8 (11.6, 26.3) 7 (1, 41) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.0)
Bryan County 6 Rural 18.1 (13.4, 24.0) 6 (1, 36) 10
*
*
Muskogee County 6 Rural 18.6 (14.5, 23.4) 5 (1, 32) 15 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.0)
Atoka County 6 Rural 19.6 (11.2, 32.2) 4 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Carter County 6 Rural 19.8 (15.0, 25.8) 3 (1, 31) 12 falling falling trend -7.3 (-12.0, -4.3)
Haskell County 6 Rural 23.9 (13.5, 39.6) 2 (1, 41) 3
*
*
Johnston County 6 Rural 25.8 (14.6, 42.7) 1 (1, 41) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.4, 7.5)
Adair County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 3:54 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adair, Alfalfa, Beaver, Blaine, Cimarron, Coal, Cotton, Craig, Custer, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Hughes, Jefferson, Kingfisher, Kiowa, Latimer, Love, Major, Marshall, Murray, Noble, Nowata, Okfuskee, Pawnee, Pushmataha, Roger Mills, Texas, Tillman, Washita, Woods, Woodward

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top