Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma 6 41.1 (40.3, 42.0) N/A 1,862 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 37.7 (37.6, 37.7) N/A 143,166 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Creek County 6 53.0 (46.3, 60.5) 12 (2, 37) 47 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.1, 6.2)
Nowata County 6 59.1 (42.1, 81.2) 3 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 6.5)
McCurtain County 6 56.3 (45.8, 68.5) 6 (1, 47) 22 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 3.9)
Beckham County 6 50.9 (38.6, 66.0) 15 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.1)
Osage County 6 44.2 (37.2, 52.4) 29 (7, 63) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.7)
Sequoyah County 6 48.8 (40.4, 58.4) 19 (3, 59) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.7, 3.9)
Delaware County 6 45.2 (37.3, 54.3) 27 (5, 64) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Pontotoc County 6 56.6 (46.9, 67.8) 5 (1, 40) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.8)
Washita County 6 44.8 (30.0, 64.7) 28 (1, 70) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.1)
Caddo County 6 38.9 (30.3, 49.4) 54 (10, 70) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.2, 2.6)
Tillman County 6 35.6 (20.3, 58.7) 65 (2, 70) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.9, 4.6)
Comanche County 6 45.5 (40.2, 51.3) 26 (8, 56) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Haskell County 6 48.9 (34.9, 67.1) 18 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.4)
Okmulgee County 6 54.2 (45.1, 64.6) 9 (1, 46) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Craig County 6 41.9 (30.0, 57.4) 35 (3, 70) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 2.8)
Atoka County 6 46.4 (33.6, 63.1) 24 (1, 70) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.6)
Choctaw County 6 55.7 (42.0, 72.9) 8 (1, 61) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Custer County 6 43.5 (33.2, 56.0) 32 (4, 69) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.5)
Garfield County 6 41.7 (35.1, 49.3) 37 (11, 66) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Harper County 6 52.1 (29.5, 88.8) 14 (1, 70) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.2, 3.9)
McClain County 6 40.2 (32.2, 49.5) 47 (9, 69) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Bryan County 6 47.7 (39.7, 57.0) 20 (3, 61) 26 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Kay County 6 53.2 (44.8, 62.8) 11 (1, 46) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Cherokee County 6 43.7 (36.1, 52.5) 31 (7, 67) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.7)
Washington County 6 43.3 (36.1, 51.5) 33 (9, 66) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Grady County 6 39.1 (32.6, 46.6) 52 (15, 69) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Okfuskee County 6 39.1 (26.4, 56.3) 53 (3, 70) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.2, 2.9)
Kingfisher County 6 57.1 (42.6, 75.2) 4 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 1.7)
Le Flore County 6 47.0 (39.4, 55.5) 23 (4, 61) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.6)
Rogers County 6 39.9 (34.8, 45.6) 49 (19, 67) 45 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Adair County 6 50.1 (38.5, 64.4) 16 (1, 65) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.6)
Garvin County 6 47.3 (37.5, 59.0) 21 (3, 66) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.9)
Marshall County 6 36.7 (26.2, 50.5) 61 (7, 70) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.7)
Woods County 6 60.0 (40.9, 85.5) 2 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.5, 3.5)
Dewey County 6 49.8 (27.8, 83.6) 17 (1, 70) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.6, 2.4)
Tulsa County 6 39.2 (37.1, 41.4) 51 (32, 60) 274 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Muskogee County 6 40.8 (34.8, 47.6) 42 (14, 67) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Payne County 6 42.1 (35.5, 49.6) 34 (11, 66) 31 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Mayes County 6 47.1 (38.9, 56.6) 22 (4, 62) 25 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Jackson County 6 41.9 (31.6, 54.4) 36 (5, 70) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.3)
Pittsburg County 6 32.9 (26.5, 40.4) 69 (31, 70) 20 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.5)
Love County 6 34.6 (21.5, 53.2) 67 (5, 70) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 2.2)
Noble County 6 40.9 (27.4, 59.2) 41 (2, 70) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.8, 1.6)
Oklahoma County 6 38.2 (36.3, 40.2) 57 (37, 62) 313 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Texas County 6 45.5 (32.3, 62.0) 25 (2, 70) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Wagoner County 6 33.5 (28.4, 39.2) 68 (34, 70) 33 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.2, 0.0)
Blaine County 6 38.3 (24.6, 57.6) 56 (3, 70) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 2.3)
Johnston County 6 36.9 (24.3, 54.3) 60 (4, 70) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 1.1)
Logan County 6 41.2 (33.7, 50.0) 39 (10, 68) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.3)
McIntosh County 6 30.5 (22.5, 41.1) 70 (27, 70) 11 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.2)
Carter County 6 40.5 (33.4, 48.6) 46 (13, 69) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.3)
Stephens County 6 41.6 (34.2, 50.2) 38 (10, 68) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Cleveland County 6 37.1 (33.9, 40.5) 59 (36, 67) 105 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
Kiowa County 6 55.8 (38.0, 79.8) 7 (1, 69) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 1.0)
Murray County 6 41.2 (28.9, 57.3) 40 (3, 70) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.5)
Pottawatomie County 6 38.4 (32.7, 44.7) 55 (21, 69) 34 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Pawnee County 6 39.8 (29.0, 53.7) 50 (5, 70) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.8, 0.4)
Hughes County 6 36.6 (25.0, 52.2) 62 (6, 70) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.8, 1.2)
Pushmataha County 6 40.7 (27.6, 58.7) 44 (2, 70) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.4)
Canadian County 6 35.3 (31.0, 40.1) 66 (34, 70) 51 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.0)
Woodward County 6 37.2 (27.1, 49.9) 58 (10, 70) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)
Lincoln County 6 40.7 (32.8, 50.2) 43 (10, 69) 19 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.0)
Greer County 6 53.9 (32.5, 84.9) 10 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.4, 1.3)
Ottawa County 6 40.1 (31.4, 50.4) 48 (7, 70) 16 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.3, -2.1)
Seminole County 6 36.1 (27.2, 47.3) 64 (13, 70) 12 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.9, -1.4)
Beaver County 6 43.8 (24.6, 73.5) 30 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Coal County 6 73.2 (47.8, 108.5) 1 (1, 59) 6
*
*
Cotton County 6 40.5 (23.3, 67.3) 45 (1, 70) 3
*
*
Jefferson County 6 36.3 (20.3, 61.5) 63 (2, 70) 3
*
*
Latimer County 6 52.7 (36.4, 74.4) 13 (1, 69) 8
*
*
Alfalfa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/28/2022 5:48 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alfalfa, Cimarron, Ellis, Grant, Harmon, Major, Roger Mills

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top