Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 No 41.2 (40.3, 42.0) N/A 1,839 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 Yes 38.0 (37.9, 38.1) N/A 143,200 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Coal County 6 No 72.6 (47.5, 107.5) 1 (1, 60) 6
*
*
Kiowa County 6 No 67.4 (46.9, 94.3) 2 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 1.9)
Latimer County 6 No 62.0 (43.8, 85.5) 3 (1, 65) 9
*
*
Dewey County 6 No 59.6 (34.2, 97.0) 4 (1, 71) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.8, 3.0)
Harper County 6 No 56.3 (33.1, 93.0) 5 (1, 71) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.2, 3.7)
Pontotoc County 6 No 54.4 (44.8, 65.5) 6 (1, 48) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.3)
Choctaw County 6 No 54.2 (40.6, 71.3) 7 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.3)
Kingfisher County 6 No 52.7 (38.7, 70.2) 8 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.4, 1.3)
Woods County 6 No 52.6 (34.5, 77.2) 9 (1, 71) 6 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.5, 2.5)
Kay County 6 No 52.3 (43.9, 61.9) 10 (2, 52) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Okmulgee County 6 No 52.2 (43.4, 62.4) 11 (2, 53) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Haskell County 6 No 52.2 (37.8, 70.9) 12 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 3.9)
Nowata County 6 No 52.2 (36.7, 72.7) 13 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.9, 7.2)
McCurtain County 6 No 50.5 (40.7, 62.1) 14 (2, 62) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.8)
Craig County 6 No 49.8 (36.8, 66.4) 15 (1, 69) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 3.7)
Cotton County 6 No 48.7 (29.9, 76.6) 16 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Creek County 6 No 48.7 (42.3, 55.8) 17 (5, 52) 44 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Adair County 6 No 48.5 (37.0, 62.7) 18 (2, 68) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 2.0)
Washita County 6 No 48.5 (32.7, 69.5) 19 (1, 71) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 3.9)
Osage County 6 No 48.3 (40.9, 56.8) 20 (4, 59) 32 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.1)
Greer County 6 No 47.7 (27.9, 77.2) 21 (1, 71) 4 stable stable trend -5.2 (-11.1, 1.1)
Atoka County 6 No 46.7 (33.4, 63.9) 22 (2, 71) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 3.2)
Comanche County 6 No 46.7 (41.3, 52.6) 23 (6, 54) 55 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Sequoyah County 6 No 46.1 (38.0, 55.5) 24 (4, 65) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.7, 4.5)
Delaware County 6 No 46.1 (38.4, 55.1) 25 (5, 64) 30 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Noble County 6 No 45.8 (31.8, 64.5) 26 (2, 71) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.9)
Bryan County 6 No 45.5 (37.7, 54.6) 27 (5, 65) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Logan County 6 No 44.9 (36.9, 54.2) 28 (5, 67) 23 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.1)
Beckham County 6 No 44.7 (33.4, 58.7) 29 (3, 70) 11 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 5.7)
Garvin County 6 No 44.5 (35.1, 55.8) 30 (4, 69) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 1.2)
Le Flore County 6 No 43.9 (36.7, 52.2) 31 (7, 66) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 2.2)
Caddo County 6 No 43.8 (34.7, 54.8) 32 (4, 69) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.2)
Texas County 6 No 43.6 (30.7, 59.8) 33 (2, 71) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.3)
Mayes County 6 No 43.2 (35.3, 52.4) 34 (6, 68) 22 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Washington County 6 No 42.8 (35.7, 51.1) 35 (8, 67) 28 rising rising trend 13.0 (1.5, 25.8)
Marshall County 6 No 42.5 (30.8, 57.5) 36 (3, 71) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.3)
Lincoln County 6 No 42.3 (34.2, 52.0) 37 (7, 69) 20 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -0.9)
Rogers County 6 No 42.2 (36.9, 48.1) 38 (13, 65) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Murray County 6 No 42.0 (29.6, 58.4) 39 (2, 71) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 1.0)
Jackson County 6 No 41.9 (31.6, 54.6) 40 (4, 71) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.4)
Payne County 6 No 41.7 (35.1, 49.1) 41 (11, 68) 30 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.3)
Cherokee County 6 No 41.4 (34.0, 50.1) 42 (9, 69) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.2)
Muskogee County 6 No 41.4 (35.4, 48.2) 43 (12, 67) 35 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Jefferson County 6 No 41.3 (23.2, 68.8) 44 (1, 71) 3
*
*
Stephens County 6 No 40.9 (33.5, 49.6) 45 (8, 69) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.9)
Custer County 6 No 40.7 (30.8, 52.8) 46 (6, 71) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.0)
Alfalfa County 6 No 40.5 (23.4, 66.9) 47 (1, 71) 3 stable stable trend -4.2 (-8.2, 0.0)
Tulsa County 6 No 40.4 (38.2, 42.6) 48 (29, 59) 276 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.8)
Pawnee County 6 No 40.1 (29.0, 54.4) 49 (5, 71) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.3, 0.8)
Pushmataha County 6 Yes 39.7 (27.0, 57.1) 50 (3, 71) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.5)
Ottawa County 6 Yes 39.6 (31.1, 49.9) 51 (9, 71) 16 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.6, -1.9)
Carter County 6 Yes 39.4 (32.4, 47.6) 52 (13, 70) 23 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.4)
Garfield County 6 Yes 39.4 (33.0, 46.8) 53 (13, 69) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Seminole County 6 Yes 39.2 (29.9, 50.5) 54 (8, 71) 13 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.2, -1.1)
Grady County 6 Yes 38.9 (32.3, 46.5) 55 (16, 70) 26 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.3)
Pottawatomie County 6 Yes 38.8 (33.1, 45.3) 56 (19, 69) 34 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
McClain County 6 Yes 38.8 (31.0, 48.0) 57 (10, 71) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.2)
Johnston County 6 Yes 38.1 (25.0, 56.2) 58 (4, 71) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.4, 1.5)
Oklahoma County 6 Yes 37.8 (35.9, 39.8) 59 (40, 65) 304 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Cleveland County 6 Yes 37.5 (34.2, 40.9) 60 (34, 67) 104 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Okfuskee County 6 Yes 37.3 (24.8, 54.4) 61 (4, 71) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.0, 2.1)
Love County 6 Yes 37.2 (23.6, 56.4) 62 (4, 71) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.2, 3.3)
Tillman County 6 Yes 37.1 (21.5, 60.4) 63 (2, 71) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.0, 5.8)
Woodward County 6 Yes 36.1 (26.1, 48.7) 64 (10, 71) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -1.0)
Blaine County 6 Yes 35.3 (22.2, 54.1) 65 (4, 71) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.0, 2.4)
Hughes County 6 Yes 34.9 (23.2, 50.8) 66 (7, 71) 6 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.1, -0.1)
Canadian County 6 Yes 34.9 (30.5, 39.7) 67 (37, 71) 48 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.1)
Wagoner County 6 Yes 34.6 (29.4, 40.6) 68 (31, 71) 33 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.1)
Pittsburg County 6 Yes 32.1 (25.9, 39.5) 69 (38, 71) 20 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.5, 0.1)
Major County 6 Yes 31.6 (17.4, 53.3) 70 (5, 71) 3 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.4, -0.5)
McIntosh County 6 Yes 29.5 (21.9, 39.6) 71 (34, 71) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.7, 0.0)
Beaver County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2021 9:42 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top