Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6,8 No 41.7 (40.9, 42.6) 1,842 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,8 Yes 38.4 (38.3, 38.5) 142,225 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Coal County 6 No 67.2 (43.8, 100.1) 6
*
*
Kiowa County 6,8 No 66.8 (46.8, 93.0) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 2.2)
Greer County 6,8 No 60.4 (37.4, 92.9) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.3, 4.3)
Kingfisher County 6,8 No 58.7 (43.5, 77.7) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.3)
Garvin County 6,8 No 56.9 (46.2, 69.4) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 2.2)
Kay County 6,8 No 55.0 (46.3, 64.8) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Choctaw County 6,8 No 53.7 (40.1, 70.8) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.2)
Craig County 6,8 No 52.9 (39.7, 69.6) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.8, 4.6)
Haskell County 6,8 No 52.4 (38.0, 71.0) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.7)
Noble County 6,8 No 51.7 (36.3, 71.9) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.7, 2.1)
Blaine County 6,8 No 51.0 (34.9, 72.6) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.2, 3.7)
Pontotoc County 6,8 No 50.7 (41.5, 61.4) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.1)
Adair County 6,8 No 50.7 (38.8, 65.1) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.8, 2.4)
McCurtain County 6,8 No 50.1 (40.5, 61.4) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.6)
Dewey County 6,8 No 49.8 (27.6, 83.9) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.5, 1.6)
Alfalfa County 6,8 No 49.8 (30.0, 79.1) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.9, 1.0)
Okmulgee County 6,8 No 49.3 (40.8, 59.1) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Creek County 6,8 No 49.3 (42.8, 56.5) 44 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Beckham County 6,8 No 48.7 (36.9, 63.1) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.5, 6.7)
Nowata County 6,8 No 48.4 (33.6, 68.4) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.7, 6.7)
Bryan County 6,8 No 48.4 (40.4, 57.6) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.8)
Mayes County 6,8 No 47.8 (39.4, 57.5) 24 stable stable trend 10.3 (-4.3, 27.1)
Texas County 6,8 No 46.7 (33.7, 63.0) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.4)
Love County 6,8 No 46.2 (30.9, 67.0) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.6, 4.3)
Muskogee County 6,8 No 46.0 (39.6, 53.1) 39 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Pushmataha County 6,8 No 46.0 (31.6, 65.3) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.2, -0.3)
Caddo County 6,8 No 45.5 (36.1, 56.7) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.4)
Tillman County 6,8 No 45.4 (28.0, 70.2) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.8, 6.5)
Woods County 6,8 No 45.2 (28.7, 68.4) 5 stable stable trend -4.3 (-10.0, 1.9)
Murray County 6,8 No 44.5 (31.6, 61.2) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.0)
Custer County 6,8 No 44.3 (33.9, 56.9) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.2, 4.0)
Carter County 6,8 No 44.3 (36.9, 52.8) 26 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Atoka County 6,8 No 44.0 (31.1, 60.8) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.3, 3.9)
Seminole County 6,8 No 43.9 (34.1, 55.9) 14 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.4, -0.6)
Comanche County 6,8 No 43.8 (38.6, 49.6) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Cotton County 6 No 43.8 (26.2, 70.3) 4
*
*
Marshall County 6,8 No 43.7 (31.8, 58.9) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.3)
Latimer County 6 No 42.7 (28.5, 62.1) 6
*
*
Ottawa County 6,8 No 42.4 (33.7, 52.9) 17 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.3, -1.1)
Tulsa County 6,8 No 42.2 (40.0, 44.5) 285 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Washita County 6,8 No 41.7 (27.4, 61.2) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.5)
Osage County 6,8 No 41.2 (34.3, 49.2) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.2)
Rogers County 6,8 No 40.7 (35.5, 46.6) 45 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.7)
Cherokee County 6,8 No 40.5 (33.0, 49.2) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Oklahoma County 6,8 No 40.5 (38.5, 42.6) 319 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Hughes County 6,8 No 40.1 (27.6, 56.7) 7 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.6, 1.0)
Jackson County 6,8 No 40.0 (29.9, 52.4) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.3, 0.2)
Logan County 6,8 Yes 39.9 (32.2, 48.8) 20 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.9, -0.2)
Stephens County 6,8 Yes 39.8 (32.7, 48.0) 24 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Lincoln County 6,8 Yes 39.7 (31.8, 49.1) 18 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.5, -1.3)
Sequoyah County 6,8 Yes 39.6 (32.2, 48.2) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.8)
Garfield County 6,8 Yes 39.4 (33.0, 46.7) 28 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Pottawatomie County 6,8 Yes 39.1 (33.3, 45.6) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Delaware County 6,8 Yes 38.6 (31.8, 46.7) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.5)
Payne County 6,8 Yes 38.3 (31.9, 45.5) 27 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.7)
McClain County 6,8 Yes 38.3 (30.3, 47.7) 17 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.2, -1.6)
Canadian County 6,8 Yes 37.7 (33.1, 42.8) 51 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.5)
Washington County 6,8 Yes 37.6 (31.0, 45.2) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Cleveland County 6,8 Yes 37.5 (34.3, 41.0) 101 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.8)
Woodward County 6,8 Yes 36.9 (26.7, 49.8) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -1.0)
Major County 6,8 Yes 36.6 (21.5, 59.2) 4 stable stable trend -4.9 (-10.0, 0.5)
Le Flore County 6,8 Yes 36.4 (29.9, 43.9) 23 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -0.9)
Pittsburg County 6,8 Yes 35.9 (29.3, 43.8) 22 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.5)
Okfuskee County 6,8 Yes 34.8 (23.0, 51.0) 6 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.8, 2.5)
Pawnee County 6,8 Yes 34.5 (24.1, 48.2) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.4, 1.6)
McIntosh County 6,8 Yes 32.9 (24.8, 43.3) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.7)
Wagoner County 6,8 Yes 32.4 (27.2, 38.3) 29 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.1)
Grady County 6,8 Yes 32.2 (26.2, 39.1) 21 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.9, 0.6)
Johnston County 6,8 Yes 29.4 (18.2, 45.7) 4 stable stable trend -4.2 (-8.5, 0.3)
Beaver County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/19/2020 6:17 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top