Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Liver & Bile Duct (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 9.2 (8.8, 9.6) N/A 458 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.8, 4.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 8.6 (8.6, 8.7) N/A 35,841 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.6)
Washington County 6 Rural 6.3 (4.1, 9.5) 36 (15, 38) 5 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.4, 12.9)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 5.6 (3.7, 8.2) 38 (22, 38) 6
*
*
Tulsa County 6 Urban 9.1 (8.1, 10.1) 24 (12, 32) 72 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.7, 5.1)
Stephens County 6 Rural 8.7 (5.6, 13.0) 26 (4, 38) 5 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.9, 10.9)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 13.5 (9.3, 19.0) 3 (1, 31) 7
*
*
Rogers County 6 Urban 7.5 (5.6, 10.0) 33 (12, 38) 10
*
*
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 10.3 (7.5, 13.8) 16 (2, 35) 9 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.7, 9.4)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 8.4 (5.2, 13.1) 28 (3, 38) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.4, 8.2)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 8.9 (5.7, 13.3) 25 (3, 38) 5
*
*
Payne County 6 Rural 7.6 (5.1, 11.0) 32 (8, 38) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.0, 7.8)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 9.6 (5.7, 15.3) 18 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Osage County 6 Urban 11.2 (7.9, 15.7) 10 (1, 35) 8 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.0, 8.9)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 10.8 (7.0, 16.0) 13 (1, 37) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.4, 7.3)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 9.6 (8.7, 10.6) 17 (10, 28) 87 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.1, 4.5)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 11.7 (8.7, 15.5) 9 (1, 32) 10 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.7, 8.6)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 13.5 (8.0, 21.9) 4 (1, 36) 4
*
*
McCurtain County 6 Rural 12.2 (7.7, 18.5) 7 (1, 36) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.3)
McClain County 6 Urban 6.9 (4.1, 11.2) 34 (7, 38) 4
*
*
Mayes County 6 Rural 9.4 (6.2, 13.8) 21 (3, 38) 6
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural 14.2 (8.1, 23.8) 2 (1, 36) 3
*
*
Logan County 6 Urban 8.1 (5.2, 12.0) 31 (6, 38) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 5.6)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 8.5 (5.1, 13.6) 27 (3, 38) 4 falling falling trend -13.6 (-30.8, -0.6)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 10.5 (7.1, 15.0) 15 (1, 37) 7 rising rising trend 6.0 (0.1, 14.8)
Kay County 6 Rural 11.7 (8.1, 16.6) 8 (1, 35) 7 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.1, 10.7)
Grady County 6 Urban 6.6 (4.1, 10.1) 35 (11, 38) 5
*
*
Garvin County 6 Rural 9.2 (5.3, 15.1) 23 (2, 38) 3
*
*
Garfield County 6 Urban 5.6 (3.5, 8.6) 37 (20, 38) 5
*
*
Delaware County 6 Rural 10.5 (7.3, 14.9) 14 (1, 36) 8
*
*
Custer County 6 Rural 11.1 (6.5, 17.8) 12 (1, 38) 4
*
*
Creek County 6 Urban 8.4 (6.0, 11.5) 29 (7, 38) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.0, 6.8)
Comanche County 6 Urban 9.4 (7.1, 12.1) 22 (5, 36) 12 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.6, 7.8)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 8.2 (6.9, 9.8) 30 (13, 36) 27 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.8)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 12.6 (8.8, 17.6) 6 (1, 33) 7
*
*
Carter County 6 Rural 9.4 (6.4, 13.5) 20 (3, 37) 6
*
*
Canadian County 6 Urban 9.6 (7.5, 12.0) 19 (5, 34) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.5, 7.9)
Caddo County 6 Rural 15.3 (9.9, 22.8) 1 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Bryan County 6 Rural 11.2 (7.8, 15.8) 11 (1, 35) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.6, 8.6)
Adair County 6 Rural 13.4 (7.9, 21.8) 5 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beckham County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 8:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alfalfa, Atoka, Beaver, Beckham, Blaine, Choctaw, Cimarron, Coal, Cotton, Craig, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Haskell, Hughes, Jackson, Jefferson, Johnston, Kingfisher, Kiowa, Latimer, Love, Major, Murray, Noble, Nowata, Okfuskee, Pawnee, Pushmataha, Roger Mills, Seminole, Texas, Tillman, Washita, Woods, Woodward

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top