Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 *** 95.7 (93.8, 97.5) N/A 2,148 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.2, 6.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Harper County 6 *** 170.7 (104.5, 266.5) 1 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.4, 3.9)
Blaine County 6 *** 135.7 (98.3, 184.1) 2 (1, 50) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.6)
Alfalfa County 6 *** 122.1 (80.6, 179.9) 3 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.3, 3.5)
Beaver County 6 *** 122.0 (76.8, 187.3) 4 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Love County 6 *** 121.6 (86.0, 168.1) 5 (1, 61) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.5, 6.2)
Ellis County 6 *** 119.6 (69.5, 197.1) 6 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 1.9)
Jackson County 6 *** 115.5 (90.9, 145.0) 7 (1, 51) 15 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 1.1)
Tulsa County 6 *** 113.9 (108.6, 119.3) 8 (3, 18) 374 stable stable trend 8.7 (-1.9, 20.5)
Oklahoma County 6 *** 110.3 (105.6, 115.2) 9 (4, 21) 436 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.6, -2.7)
Kiowa County 6 *** 106.8 (74.6, 150.6) 10 (1, 68) 7 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -1.5)
Texas County 6 *** 105.6 (78.0, 139.5) 11 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.1)
Kingfisher County 6 *** 104.3 (76.2, 139.7) 12 (1, 65) 9 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.9, 0.4)
Logan County 6 *** 102.8 (86.8, 121.1) 13 (3, 51) 31 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.8, -2.5)
Canadian County 6 *** 102.7 (92.0, 114.3) 14 (4, 39) 72 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.4, -1.9)
Pontotoc County 6 *** 102.6 (84.6, 123.6) 15 (2, 55) 23 falling falling trend -5.9 (-7.9, -3.9)
Wagoner County 6 *** 101.8 (89.0, 116.0) 16 (4, 48) 48 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.6, -0.1)
Greer County 6 *** 101.5 (61.0, 160.0) 17 (1, 70) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.7, 0.8)
McClain County 6 *** 101.3 (83.5, 122.1) 18 (3, 56) 24 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.5, -2.2)
Grady County 6 *** 101.2 (86.6, 117.7) 19 (4, 50) 36 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.0)
Carter County 6 *** 99.5 (83.5, 117.8) 20 (4, 55) 29 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Comanche County 6 *** 99.1 (87.6, 111.7) 21 (5, 47) 56 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Okmulgee County 6 *** 96.8 (80.1, 116.1) 22 (3, 59) 24 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.1)
Tillman County 6 *** 96.1 (62.2, 144.4) 23 (1, 70) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.5, 4.1)
Kay County 6 *** 96.0 (80.5, 113.8) 24 (4, 58) 28 rising rising trend 17.2 (1.7, 35.1)
Custer County 6 *** 95.4 (73.8, 121.3) 25 (3, 65) 14 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.4, -2.8)
Caddo County 6 *** 95.2 (75.4, 118.8) 26 (3, 65) 16 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.6)
McCurtain County 6 *** 95.0 (77.4, 115.7) 27 (4, 62) 21 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.3)
Cleveland County 6 *** 94.5 (87.3, 102.3) 28 (12, 46) 133 stable stable trend -1.6 (-8.1, 5.5)
Washita County 6 *** 94.0 (65.1, 132.5) 29 (2, 69) 7 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.3, -3.2)
Woods County 6 *** 93.9 (61.8, 138.1) 30 (1, 70) 5 falling falling trend -9.6 (-15.0, -3.8)
Muskogee County 6 *** 91.9 (79.0, 106.5) 31 (8, 59) 38 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.3, -2.5)
Latimer County 6 *** 90.3 (63.7, 126.2) 32 (2, 69) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.3, 3.0)
Marshall County 6 *** 90.2 (68.4, 118.0) 33 (3, 68) 12 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.1, -0.2)
Sequoyah County 6 *** 89.5 (74.0, 107.6) 34 (7, 63) 24 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.3, 0.2)
Major County 6 *** 89.3 (57.4, 135.0) 35 (2, 70) 5 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.8, -0.1)
Craig County 6 *** 89.0 (64.6, 120.6) 36 (3, 69) 9 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.8, 0.7)
Beckham County 6 *** 88.8 (65.6, 117.4) 37 (3, 69) 10 falling falling trend -6.4 (-8.4, -4.3)
Stephens County 6 *** 88.7 (74.1, 105.8) 38 (7, 64) 27 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Le Flore County 6 *** 88.2 (73.9, 104.7) 39 (8, 63) 28 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.8)
Creek County 6 *** 87.2 (75.4, 100.3) 40 (12, 60) 41 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -0.6)
Hughes County 6 *** 86.2 (60.4, 119.9) 41 (3, 70) 7 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.8, -3.1)
Rogers County 6 *** 85.6 (74.8, 97.5) 42 (16, 61) 48 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.4)
Pawnee County 6 *** 85.4 (63.6, 113.4) 43 (4, 69) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.3, 2.2)
Cherokee County 6 *** 84.3 (69.4, 101.5) 44 (11, 67) 24 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.2, -2.5)
Garfield County 6 *** 84.2 (71.1, 99.1) 45 (13, 65) 30 falling falling trend -10.8 (-12.7, -8.7)
Noble County 6 *** 81.7 (55.8, 116.9) 46 (3, 70) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.8, -0.5)
Garvin County 6 *** 81.2 (63.2, 103.1) 47 (10, 68) 14 falling falling trend -5.7 (-7.6, -3.8)
Washington County 6 *** 80.1 (67.2, 95.0) 48 (17, 67) 28 stable stable trend 11.8 (-0.7, 25.9)
Choctaw County 6 *** 79.5 (56.8, 109.6) 49 (5, 70) 8 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.4, -2.1)
Payne County 6 *** 79.3 (66.7, 93.5) 50 (18, 67) 29 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.0, -3.1)
Pittsburg County 6 *** 78.8 (65.0, 94.9) 51 (17, 68) 24 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -2.2)
Pottawatomie County 6 *** 77.0 (65.4, 90.2) 52 (24, 67) 33 stable stable trend -1.6 (-9.0, 6.4)
Mayes County 6 *** 76.9 (62.5, 93.9) 53 (17, 69) 21 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.1, -2.1)
Okfuskee County 6 *** 76.4 (51.4, 110.0) 54 (4, 70) 6 falling falling trend -7.3 (-11.5, -2.9)
Woodward County 6 *** 75.5 (55.1, 101.1) 55 (9, 70) 9 falling falling trend -8.2 (-11.4, -4.9)
Delaware County 6 *** 75.3 (63.0, 89.7) 56 (25, 68) 28 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.8, 1.5)
Johnston County 6 *** 74.5 (49.5, 109.2) 57 (5, 70) 6 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.6, -0.3)
Murray County 6 *** 74.2 (51.5, 104.5) 58 (6, 70) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.7, -0.6)
Seminole County 6 *** 74.1 (56.1, 96.4) 59 (13, 70) 12 falling falling trend -8.9 (-11.5, -6.3)
Ottawa County 6 *** 73.1 (56.8, 92.8) 60 (16, 70) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.8)
Pushmataha County 6 *** 69.6 (46.7, 101.7) 61 (10, 70) 6 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.2, 1.2)
Bryan County 6 *** 69.0 (55.8, 84.7) 62 (31, 70) 20 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.4, -3.4)
Haskell County 6 *** 67.1 (44.7, 98.0) 63 (11, 70) 6 stable stable trend 21.7 (-5.4, 56.6)
Osage County 6 *** 67.1 (55.1, 81.3) 64 (35, 70) 23 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.3, -2.2)
Lincoln County 6 *** 66.4 (52.4, 83.4) 65 (32, 70) 16 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.1, -3.1)
Jefferson County 6 *** 64.2 (36.5, 108.8) 66 (6, 70) 3 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.1, -1.0)
Adair County 6 *** 63.5 (45.3, 87.0) 67 (20, 70) 8 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.0, -1.0)
Nowata County 6 *** 62.0 (39.1, 95.0) 68 (14, 70) 5 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.1, -0.5)
McIntosh County 6 *** 56.9 (42.1, 76.7) 69 (42, 70) 10 falling falling trend -7.9 (-10.0, -5.8)
Atoka County 6 *** 49.3 (32.1, 73.7) 70 (40, 70) 5 stable stable trend 15.8 (-22.8, 73.8)
Cimarron County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2021 2:26 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top