Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma 6 | 100.5 (98.7, 102.4) | N/A | 2,342 |
stable 
|
3.7 (-0.6, 9.4) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) | N/A | 212,734 |
rising 
|
2.5 (1.0, 4.1) |
| Adair County 6 | 57.1 (40.0, 79.4) | 69 (39, 70) | 8 |
falling 
|
-4.6 (-7.7, -1.7) |
| Alfalfa County 6 | 120.0 (77.9, 179.1) | 6 (1, 69) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-8.5, 5.2) |
| Atoka County 6 | 55.1 (36.4, 81.1) | 70 (36, 70) | 6 |
falling
|
-7.4 (-13.1, -2.7) |
| Beaver County 6 | 142.9 (94.3, 211.1) | 1 (1, 64) | 6 |
|
|
| Beckham County 6 | 82.5 (60.6, 109.8) | 53 (6, 70) | 10 |
falling
|
-6.0 (-8.7, -3.7) |
| Blaine County 6 | 141.6 (103.8, 190.4) | 2 (1, 53) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-5.0, 2.0) |
| Bryan County 6 | 65.9 (53.3, 80.7) | 68 (43, 70) | 20 |
falling
|
-5.1 (-8.0, -2.3) |
| Caddo County 6 | 97.7 (77.8, 121.2) | 25 (3, 66) | 17 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-3.6, 0.3) |
| Canadian County 6 | 105.3 (94.9, 116.6) | 14 (5, 43) | 80 |
falling
|
-4.4 (-6.7, -2.1) |
| Carter County 6 | 88.5 (73.7, 105.7) | 44 (10, 66) | 26 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.0, 0.6) |
| Cherokee County 6 | 84.0 (69.6, 100.8) | 51 (14, 68) | 25 |
stable
|
1.6 (-4.0, 13.1) |
| Choctaw County 6 | 91.9 (67.3, 123.6) | 39 (2, 69) | 10 |
stable
|
12.5 (-4.9, 29.2) |
| Cleveland County 6 | 90.1 (83.3, 97.4) | 42 (20, 55) | 136 |
stable
|
0.1 (-3.1, 5.0) |
| Comanche County 6 | 115.2 (103.0, 128.4) | 8 (2, 32) | 68 |
rising
|
8.2 (0.8, 15.8) |
| Craig County 6 | 101.7 (75.1, 135.6) | 18 (1, 68) | 10 |
stable
|
-2.9 (-6.4, 0.5) |
| Creek County 6 | 104.1 (91.3, 118.2) | 15 (5, 50) | 50 |
stable
|
11.9 (-4.0, 27.9) |
| Custer County 6 | 99.7 (77.9, 125.9) | 22 (3, 64) | 15 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-7.0, -1.6) |
| Delaware County 6 | 75.7 (63.4, 90.2) | 61 (28, 69) | 29 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-4.6, 2.1) |
| Dewey County 6 | 96.8 (56.1, 160.4) | 26 (1, 70) | 3 |
stable
|
-5.4 (-11.8, 0.0) |
| Ellis County 6 | 123.4 (72.4, 202.2) | 5 (1, 70) | 4 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-6.9, 1.9) |
| Garfield County 6 | 100.1 (85.9, 116.2) | 20 (5, 56) | 36 |
stable
|
6.9 (-1.8, 13.4) |
| Garvin County 6 | 72.5 (55.8, 93.1) | 62 (21, 70) | 13 |
falling
|
-9.5 (-21.8, -6.6) |
| Grady County 6 | 92.5 (78.9, 107.9) | 37 (8, 63) | 35 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-5.1, 0.0) |
| Greer County 6 | 95.9 (55.8, 155.1) | 31 (1, 70) | 3 |
stable
|
-3.6 (-8.0, 0.1) |
| Harper County 6 | 125.9 (70.7, 211.4) | 4 (1, 70) | 3 |
stable
|
-2.0 (-7.8, 4.2) |
| Haskell County 6 | 76.2 (52.9, 107.7) | 60 (7, 70) | 7 |
stable
|
22.3 (-5.4, 74.8) |
| Hughes County 6 | 91.6 (65.0, 126.0) | 40 (2, 70) | 8 |
falling
|
-4.7 (-6.7, -2.9) |
| Jackson County 6 | 88.2 (66.7, 114.6) | 45 (5, 70) | 12 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-7.2, 2.0) |
| Johnston County 6 | 87.8 (60.3, 125.0) | 47 (3, 70) | 7 |
stable
|
-2.5 (-8.2, 3.3) |
| Kay County 6 | 100.1 (84.4, 118.1) | 21 (4, 58) | 30 |
falling
|
-6.3 (-8.6, -4.5) |
| Kingfisher County 6 | 105.4 (77.9, 140.1) | 13 (1, 68) | 10 |
stable
|
-3.4 (-7.7, 0.8) |
| Kiowa County 6 | 96.6 (65.8, 139.2) | 28 (1, 70) | 7 |
falling
|
-3.8 (-6.9, -1.0) |
| Latimer County 6 | 96.4 (68.6, 133.7) | 29 (1, 70) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-6.1, 3.9) |
| Le Flore County 6 | 78.5 (65.3, 93.8) | 59 (22, 69) | 26 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-4.6, -1.0) |
| Lincoln County 6 | 93.1 (76.5, 112.7) | 35 (6, 65) | 23 |
falling
|
-3.7 (-7.0, -0.4) |
| Logan County 6 | 81.2 (67.5, 97.1) | 56 (18, 68) | 26 |
falling
|
-4.0 (-5.5, -2.5) |
| Love County 6 | 94.7 (64.4, 135.6) | 33 (1, 70) | 7 |
stable
|
0.5 (-5.1, 7.8) |
| Major County 6 | 95.2 (61.9, 142.6) | 32 (1, 70) | 5 |
stable
|
-4.1 (-9.1, 0.3) |
| Marshall County 6 | 69.7 (50.5, 95.0) | 66 (18, 70) | 9 |
stable
|
-3.7 (-7.2, 0.0) |
| Mayes County 6 | 92.7 (77.0, 110.9) | 36 (7, 64) | 26 |
stable
|
13.0 (-4.0, 27.3) |
| McClain County 6 | 113.5 (95.2, 134.5) | 9 (1, 48) | 28 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-6.0, -0.6) |
| McCurtain County 6 | 103.9 (85.6, 125.3) | 16 (3, 58) | 23 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-4.5, 1.2) |
| McIntosh County 6 | 72.2 (55.0, 94.4) | 63 (23, 70) | 13 |
falling
|
-7.0 (-9.7, -4.8) |
| Murray County 6 | 86.3 (61.9, 118.2) | 48 (3, 70) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-5.0, 1.6) |
| Muskogee County 6 | 94.4 (81.3, 109.1) | 34 (8, 60) | 39 |
falling
|
-4.4 (-6.8, -2.3) |
| Noble County 6 | 99.1 (70.3, 137.3) | 23 (1, 69) | 8 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-6.6, -0.2) |
| Nowata County 6 | 81.8 (55.3, 118.4) | 54 (3, 70) | 6 |
stable
|
-4.1 (-8.8, 0.0) |
| Okfuskee County 6 | 71.4 (47.4, 104.1) | 64 (9, 70) | 6 |
falling
|
-7.0 (-11.4, -3.2) |
| Oklahoma County 6 | 109.4 (104.8, 114.2) | 12 (6, 25) | 452 |
falling
|
-3.4 (-4.6, -2.2) |
| Okmulgee County 6 | 109.9 (92.2, 130.3) | 11 (2, 53) | 28 |
stable
|
-2.7 (-5.7, 0.3) |
| Osage County 6 | 68.4 (56.7, 82.2) | 67 (40, 70) | 25 |
falling
|
-4.5 (-7.9, -1.2) |
| Ottawa County 6 | 84.6 (67.8, 104.8) | 50 (9, 68) | 18 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-4.6, 3.2) |
| Pawnee County 6 | 101.7 (77.7, 131.9) | 19 (2, 67) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-5.1, 3.7) |
| Payne County 6 | 91.2 (77.8, 106.2) | 41 (10, 62) | 34 |
rising
|
12.1 (2.7, 19.2) |
| Pittsburg County 6 | 88.0 (73.6, 104.6) | 46 (11, 66) | 27 |
falling
|
-3.6 (-5.6, -1.7) |
| Pontotoc County 6 | 96.0 (78.7, 116.0) | 30 (4, 63) | 22 |
falling
|
-5.7 (-7.9, -3.6) |
| Pottawatomie County 6 | 85.4 (73.4, 99.0) | 49 (16, 65) | 38 |
stable
|
4.5 (-1.6, 16.3) |
| Pushmataha County 6 | 92.3 (66.0, 127.8) | 38 (2, 70) | 8 |
stable
|
-3.4 (-10.4, 2.7) |
| Rogers County 6 | 98.8 (87.5, 111.2) | 24 (7, 52) | 58 |
rising
|
11.2 (3.2, 22.6) |
| Seminole County 6 | 80.0 (62.1, 102.2) | 57 (11, 70) | 14 |
rising
|
12.4 (5.2, 19.0) |
| Sequoyah County 6 | 81.3 (66.9, 98.3) | 55 (17, 69) | 23 |
falling
|
-3.1 (-6.1, -0.1) |
| Stephens County 6 | 70.9 (57.9, 86.2) | 65 (32, 70) | 22 |
falling
|
-12.4 (-25.0, -2.5) |
| Texas County 6 | 111.3 (83.5, 145.4) | 10 (1, 65) | 11 |
stable
|
13.4 (-1.0, 35.0) |
| Tillman County 6 | 78.6 (47.4, 124.7) | 58 (2, 70) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-7.3, 4.9) |
| Tulsa County 6 | 130.6 (125.1, 136.2) | 3 (1, 10) | 452 |
rising
|
7.6 (0.2, 17.2) |
| Wagoner County 6 | 103.6 (91.2, 117.3) | 17 (4, 49) | 53 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-5.5, 0.5) |
| Washington County 6 | 96.8 (82.6, 113.0) | 27 (6, 59) | 34 |
rising
|
14.1 (7.8, 22.4) |
| Washita County 6 | 83.7 (56.4, 121.0) | 52 (3, 70) | 6 |
falling
|
-6.6 (-10.6, -3.4) |
| Woods County 6 | 117.7 (81.4, 166.2) | 7 (1, 68) | 7 |
stable
|
15.1 (-5.5, 38.2) |
| Woodward County 6 | 89.2 (66.8, 116.9) | 43 (4, 69) | 11 |
stable
|
15.6 (-7.6, 39.3) |
| Cimarron County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Coal County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cotton County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Grant County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Harmon County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Jefferson County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Roger Mills County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 9:51 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cimarron, Coal, Cotton, Grant, Harmon, Jefferson, Roger Mills
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/18/2024 9:51 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cimarron, Coal, Cotton, Grant, Harmon, Jefferson, Roger Mills
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.