Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 21.3 (20.7, 21.9) N/A 975 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Craig County 6 Rural 34.3 (22.8, 49.8) 1 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.4, 7.6)
Okfuskee County 6 Rural 33.4 (21.1, 50.8) 2 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Adair County 6 Rural 32.3 (22.0, 45.7) 3 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.3, 11.0)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 30.1 (23.4, 38.0) 4 (1, 39) 15 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.5, 6.2)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 29.6 (22.2, 38.8) 5 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.7, 4.5)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 29.3 (22.7, 37.3) 6 (1, 42) 15 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.2, 5.6)
Mayes County 6 Rural 29.2 (22.5, 37.4) 7 (1, 43) 14 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.1, 8.8)
Hughes County 6 Rural 29.1 (18.2, 44.5) 8 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.8, 6.3)
Seminole County 6 Rural 29.0 (20.5, 40.0) 9 (1, 50) 8 stable stable trend 15.5 (-1.0, 49.3)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 28.7 (21.8, 37.3) 10 (1, 47) 13 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.7, 8.3)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 27.1 (18.4, 39.0) 11 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.1, 6.4)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 26.7 (17.6, 39.4) 12 (1, 52) 6 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.5, 8.5)
Caddo County 6 Rural 26.5 (19.1, 36.0) 13 (1, 51) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.6, 8.2)
Marshall County 6 Rural 26.5 (17.3, 39.3) 14 (1, 52) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-4.1, 11.3)
Creek County 6 Urban 25.8 (21.2, 31.3) 15 (3, 45) 23 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.8, 6.7)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 25.7 (19.1, 33.9) 16 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.3, 6.1)
Haskell County 6 Rural 25.3 (14.7, 40.8) 17 (1, 52) 4 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.4, 9.1)
Delaware County 6 Rural 25.1 (19.1, 32.6) 18 (2, 50) 14 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.1, 9.5)
Atoka County 6 Rural 24.8 (15.4, 38.1) 19 (1, 52) 5
*
*
Garvin County 6 Rural 24.6 (17.2, 34.3) 20 (1, 52) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.0, 5.3)
Choctaw County 6 Rural 24.5 (15.7, 37.1) 21 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-6.0, 8.9)
McClain County 6 Urban 24.2 (18.4, 31.4) 22 (3, 51) 12 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.0, 7.9)
Stephens County 6 Rural 24.2 (18.6, 31.0) 23 (3, 50) 14 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 5.6)
Noble County 6 Rural 24.1 (14.2, 39.1) 24 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Kay County 6 Rural 23.6 (18.1, 30.5) 25 (3, 51) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-10.0, 2.5)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 23.5 (19.0, 28.8) 26 (6, 49) 20 rising rising trend 15.1 (0.5, 26.7)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 23.4 (18.0, 30.2) 27 (3, 51) 14 rising rising trend 4.2 (2.0, 6.8)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 23.4 (14.2, 36.4) 28 (1, 52) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.5, 7.1)
Grady County 6 Urban 23.0 (18.1, 29.0) 29 (5, 50) 16 stable stable trend 5.3 (-17.1, 22.6)
Rogers County 6 Urban 22.6 (18.9, 27.0) 30 (9, 49) 27 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 4.4)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 22.6 (18.0, 28.0) 31 (7, 50) 18 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.8, 6.3)
Custer County 6 Rural 22.5 (15.4, 31.9) 32 (2, 52) 7 rising rising trend 12.3 (0.2, 40.1)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 22.3 (18.1, 27.1) 33 (9, 50) 21 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.6, 7.7)
Washington County 6 Rural 22.2 (17.1, 28.3) 34 (6, 51) 14 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 6.3)
Beckham County 6 Rural 22.2 (14.7, 32.3) 35 (2, 52) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.5, 3.2)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 21.6 (20.1, 23.2) 36 (21, 44) 161 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.4)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 21.5 (16.2, 28.2) 37 (5, 52) 12 stable stable trend 6.7 (-6.8, 25.3)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 21.4 (16.1, 27.9) 38 (6, 52) 12 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.2, 7.5)
Carter County 6 Rural 21.4 (16.2, 27.8) 39 (7, 52) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.5)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 21.3 (14.9, 29.6) 40 (4, 52) 8 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.6, 11.4)
Payne County 6 Rural 21.0 (16.5, 26.5) 41 (9, 52) 15 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 21.0 (14.1, 30.2) 42 (4, 52) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.4, 5.4)
Woodward County 6 Rural 20.4 (12.9, 30.7) 43 (2, 52) 5
*
*
Murray County 6 Rural 20.2 (11.8, 32.8) 44 (2, 52) 4
*
*
Canadian County 6 Urban 19.7 (16.7, 23.1) 45 (20, 51) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.1, 2.1)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 19.7 (17.5, 22.1) 46 (25, 50) 61 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.5)
Logan County 6 Urban 19.7 (15.0, 25.4) 47 (12, 52) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 5.8)
Bryan County 6 Rural 19.5 (14.4, 25.9) 48 (10, 52) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.6)
Comanche County 6 Urban 19.1 (15.7, 23.0) 49 (20, 52) 24 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.4, 3.2)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 17.3 (16.1, 18.7) 50 (40, 52) 149 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Osage County 6 Urban 16.0 (11.9, 21.3) 51 (27, 52) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.7, 4.4)
Garfield County 6 Urban 13.7 (10.1, 18.2) 52 (40, 52) 10 falling falling trend -9.0 (-34.5, -1.7)
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 6:04 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alfalfa, Beaver, Blaine, Cimarron, Coal, Cotton, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Jefferson, Johnston, Kiowa, Latimer, Love, Major, Nowata, Pushmataha, Roger Mills, Texas, Tillman, Washita, Woods

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top