Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6 20.9 (20.3, 21.6) N/A 953 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.9, 2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.3 (17.3, 17.4) N/A 66,203 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Adair County 6 33.8 (23.8, 46.7) 1 (1, 46) 8 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.9, 8.8)
Okfuskee County 6 33.6 (21.3, 50.7) 2 (1, 54) 5
*
*
Noble County 6 30.8 (19.5, 46.9) 3 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Craig County 6 28.8 (18.9, 42.5) 4 (1, 55) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.6, 7.0)
Mayes County 6 28.6 (22.0, 36.5) 5 (1, 42) 14 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.7, 7.9)
Love County 6 28.4 (16.1, 46.8) 6 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Okmulgee County 6 28.4 (21.9, 36.3) 7 (1, 44) 14 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.9, 5.3)
Cherokee County 6 28.3 (22.0, 35.8) 8 (1, 42) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.3)
Ottawa County 6 28.0 (20.5, 37.5) 9 (1, 51) 10 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.5, 9.2)
Kingfisher County 6 27.4 (17.7, 40.8) 10 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.4, 8.0)
Choctaw County 6 25.6 (16.9, 37.8) 11 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.1, 6.9)
McCurtain County 6 25.2 (18.6, 33.4) 12 (1, 53) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.1, 4.2)
Lincoln County 6 25.0 (18.6, 33.0) 13 (1, 53) 11 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.3, 7.2)
Seminole County 6 24.8 (17.0, 35.1) 14 (1, 55) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.7, 8.2)
Kiowa County 6 24.7 (13.4, 42.4) 15 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Haskell County 6 24.6 (14.4, 39.6) 16 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.0, 8.1)
Pittsburg County 6 24.5 (19.0, 31.3) 17 (2, 51) 14 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.3, 6.8)
Woodward County 6 24.0 (16.0, 34.9) 18 (1, 56) 6
*
*
Caddo County 6 23.9 (17.0, 32.9) 19 (1, 55) 8 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.1, 7.1)
Muskogee County 6 23.9 (19.3, 29.3) 20 (3, 50) 20 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.5, 6.6)
Marshall County 6 23.7 (15.7, 34.9) 21 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.3, 8.3)
Creek County 6 23.7 (19.3, 28.8) 22 (4, 49) 21 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.6, 5.5)
Rogers County 6 23.5 (19.6, 28.0) 23 (5, 48) 26 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.2)
McIntosh County 6 23.4 (15.6, 34.1) 24 (1, 56) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.5, 6.0)
Pawnee County 6 23.1 (14.6, 35.1) 25 (1, 56) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.3, 6.2)
Hughes County 6 23.0 (13.8, 36.3) 26 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.7, 5.5)
Pontotoc County 6 22.8 (16.7, 30.5) 27 (3, 55) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.2)
Sequoyah County 6 22.8 (17.5, 29.4) 28 (4, 54) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.8, 5.3)
Tulsa County 6 22.6 (21.1, 24.3) 29 (14, 40) 163 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.7, 4.1)
Beckham County 6 22.4 (15.0, 32.3) 30 (1, 56) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.7)
Stephens County 6 22.2 (16.9, 28.7) 31 (5, 54) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.0)
Carter County 6 22.2 (16.9, 28.6) 32 (4, 54) 13 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 4.7)
Kay County 6 21.7 (16.4, 28.1) 33 (5, 55) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.0, 6.6)
Delaware County 6 21.6 (16.1, 28.5) 34 (4, 56) 12 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.1, 7.9)
Grady County 6 21.5 (16.7, 27.4) 35 (6, 54) 14 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.7, 6.0)
Pottawatomie County 6 21.3 (17.1, 26.3) 36 (8, 53) 19 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Wagoner County 6 21.3 (17.2, 26.1) 37 (8, 53) 20 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.9, 6.4)
Atoka County 6 21.1 (12.3, 34.1) 38 (1, 56) 4
*
*
Jackson County 6 21.0 (14.1, 30.3) 39 (3, 56) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.6, 4.6)
McClain County 6 21.0 (15.6, 27.8) 40 (5, 56) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 6.7)
Pushmataha County 6 20.4 (11.7, 34.0) 41 (2, 56) 4
*
*
Texas County 6 19.5 (11.6, 30.7) 42 (2, 56) 4
*
*
Cleveland County 6 19.5 (17.3, 22.0) 43 (22, 52) 57 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 2.6)
Comanche County 6 19.2 (15.8, 23.0) 44 (17, 55) 24 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.4)
Garvin County 6 19.0 (12.8, 27.3) 45 (5, 56) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 3.8)
Canadian County 6 18.8 (15.8, 22.3) 46 (21, 55) 28 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 4.7)
Logan County 6 18.7 (14.1, 24.6) 47 (11, 56) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.5, 4.2)
Bryan County 6 18.5 (13.6, 24.8) 48 (9, 56) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.0)
Washington County 6 18.5 (13.9, 24.1) 49 (13, 56) 12 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.6, 5.6)
Le Flore County 6 18.3 (13.7, 24.0) 50 (12, 56) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.8, 6.7)
Murray County 6 18.0 (10.4, 29.7) 51 (4, 56) 4
*
*
Custer County 6 17.5 (11.2, 26.1) 52 (7, 56) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.0, 1.8)
Oklahoma County 6 17.3 (16.0, 18.6) 53 (38, 55) 146 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.3)
Osage County 6 15.9 (11.7, 21.2) 54 (23, 56) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.1)
Payne County 6 14.8 (11.1, 19.4) 55 (32, 56) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.8)
Garfield County 6 14.1 (10.4, 18.7) 56 (34, 56) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.8)
Alfalfa County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 4:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alfalfa, Beaver, Blaine, Cimarron, Coal, Cotton, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Jefferson, Johnston, Latimer, Major, Nowata, Roger Mills, Tillman, Washita, Woods

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top