Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma 6 N/A 17.3 (16.8, 17.9) N/A 796 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 71,542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Jackson County 6 Rural 24.0 (16.2, 34.3) 2 (1, 43) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.1, 7.1)
Osage County 6 Urban 17.5 (13.1, 23.1) 19 (2, 45) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 4.0)
Comanche County 6 Urban 18.1 (14.8, 21.9) 16 (3, 40) 22 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.4, 4.0)
Okmulgee County 6 Urban 16.5 (11.6, 23.0) 31 (2, 46) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.6, 5.7)
Woodward County 6 Rural 14.0 (8.2, 22.5) 42 (2, 46) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.0, 6.2)
Murray County 6 Rural 20.7 (12.1, 33.4) 5 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.8)
Sequoyah County 6 Urban 19.5 (14.4, 25.9) 9 (1, 44) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 3.0)
Pontotoc County 6 Rural 19.5 (14.2, 26.3) 8 (1, 44) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.9)
Seminole County 6 Rural 15.3 (9.8, 23.1) 36 (2, 46) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.5, 4.2)
Washington County 6 Rural 17.2 (13.0, 22.5) 23 (2, 44) 12 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.9)
Kay County 6 Rural 20.0 (14.9, 26.3) 6 (1, 41) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 2.7)
Lincoln County 6 Urban 15.4 (10.9, 21.5) 33 (3, 46) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.4, 5.2)
Grady County 6 Urban 20.0 (15.5, 25.5) 7 (1, 40) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.8)
Mayes County 6 Rural 23.1 (17.5, 30.0) 3 (1, 36) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 3.0)
McClain County 6 Urban 19.3 (13.9, 26.0) 11 (1, 44) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.5)
Le Flore County 6 Rural 16.7 (12.4, 22.1) 30 (3, 46) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.8)
Caddo County 6 Rural 17.6 (11.6, 25.7) 18 (1, 46) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.7, 4.4)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 19.5 (14.5, 25.6) 10 (1, 43) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.0, 4.8)
Garfield County 6 Urban 17.9 (13.7, 23.0) 17 (2, 44) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.7)
Oklahoma County 6 Urban 18.4 (17.1, 19.8) 14 (7, 30) 154 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Stephens County 6 Rural 22.9 (17.5, 29.5) 4 (1, 35) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 2.8)
Muskogee County 6 Rural 17.1 (13.3, 21.7) 24 (3, 44) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.5)
Tulsa County 6 Urban 17.3 (15.9, 18.7) 22 (11, 36) 127 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Canadian County 6 Urban 16.7 (13.9, 19.9) 29 (6, 43) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.0)
Cleveland County 6 Urban 15.0 (13.1, 17.2) 39 (16, 44) 45 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.8)
Creek County 6 Urban 16.9 (13.2, 21.3) 26 (3, 44) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 2.0)
Payne County 6 Rural 14.5 (11.0, 18.9) 40 (8, 46) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 1.9)
Pawnee County 6 Urban 15.3 (8.7, 25.5) 35 (1, 46) 3 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 2.8)
Bryan County 6 Rural 16.8 (12.4, 22.4) 27 (2, 45) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.5)
Kingfisher County 6 Rural 16.7 (9.6, 27.5) 28 (1, 46) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.5, 3.8)
Delaware County 6 Rural 17.0 (12.4, 23.0) 25 (2, 46) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 2.0)
Logan County 6 Urban 16.4 (12.0, 22.1) 32 (2, 46) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.2, 4.6)
Garvin County 6 Rural 17.5 (11.3, 25.9) 20 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.2, 1.6)
McCurtain County 6 Rural 18.4 (12.8, 25.9) 13 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 1.8)
Beckham County 6 Rural 15.3 (9.2, 24.1) 34 (2, 46) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.8)
Pottawatomie County 6 Rural 17.4 (13.6, 22.1) 21 (2, 44) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.1)
Wagoner County 6 Urban 13.4 (10.3, 17.2) 43 (16, 46) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.4)
Rogers County 6 Urban 19.2 (15.7, 23.3) 12 (2, 39) 22 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.2)
McIntosh County 6 Rural 11.5 (6.8, 19.0) 46 (10, 46) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-9.1, 3.8)
Custer County 6 Rural 12.5 (7.4, 19.7) 44 (5, 46) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.8, -0.3)
Pittsburg County 6 Rural 14.4 (10.3, 19.6) 41 (7, 46) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.7, -0.3)
Carter County 6 Rural 11.7 (8.0, 16.6) 45 (17, 46) 7 stable stable trend -10.1 (-29.4, 6.9)
Ottawa County 6 Rural 15.2 (10.1, 22.1) 37 (3, 46) 6 falling falling trend -16.5 (-48.3, -0.6)
Craig County 6 Rural 18.3 (10.8, 29.7) 15 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Marshall County 6 Rural 15.1 (8.4, 25.5) 38 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Nowata County 6 Rural 24.4 (13.9, 40.7) 1 (1, 46) 3
*
*
Adair County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alfalfa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 10:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adair, Alfalfa, Atoka, Beaver, Blaine, Choctaw, Cimarron, Coal, Cotton, Dewey, Ellis, Grant, Greer, Harmon, Harper, Haskell, Hughes, Jefferson, Johnston, Kiowa, Latimer, Love, Major, Noble, Okfuskee, Pushmataha, Roger Mills, Texas, Tillman, Washita, Woods

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top