Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Oklahoma 6,10 38.1 (37.0, 39.3) 865 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.8, 2.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Blaine County 6,10 68.1 (41.4, 106.3) 4 stable stable trend -4.9 (-45.0, 64.8)
Kiowa County 6,10 61.9 (36.3, 99.8) 4
*
*
Caddo County 6,10 59.3 (43.7, 79.0) 10 stable stable trend -9.9 (-37.7, 30.3)
Choctaw County 6,10 55.3 (35.6, 82.4) 6 stable stable trend -15.8 (-52.3, 48.8)
Noble County 6,10 54.5 (33.1, 85.5) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-45.9, 95.1)
Craig County 6,10 53.1 (34.7, 78.9) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-37.4, 59.4)
Texas County 6,10 51.6 (33.5, 75.9) 5 rising rising trend 31.5 (8.5, 59.3)
Garvin County 6,10 49.7 (35.8, 67.5) 9 stable stable trend 15.8 (-8.4, 46.5)
Payne County 6,10 46.7 (36.9, 58.3) 16 stable stable trend -13.2 (-35.5, 16.8)
Jackson County 6,10 46.4 (31.8, 65.5) 7 stable stable trend -11.8 (-39.2, 27.9)
Canadian County 6,10 45.4 (38.1, 53.7) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-21.5, 24.1)
Johnston County 6,10 45.3 (26.2, 74.3) 3
*
*
McIntosh County 6,10 44.9 (31.7, 63.2) 8 stable stable trend -3.2 (-29.4, 32.8)
Pontotoc County 6,10 44.8 (33.4, 59.1) 11 stable stable trend 10.2 (-13.0, 39.7)
Comanche County 6,10 44.3 (37.1, 52.6) 27 stable stable trend 1.1 (-25.4, 37.2)
Washington County 6,10 43.9 (34.9, 54.8) 17 stable stable trend 3.8 (-11.3, 21.4)
Custer County 6,10 43.3 (29.5, 61.3) 7 stable stable trend 4.2 (-26.0, 46.9)
Creek County 6,10 42.4 (34.5, 51.8) 20 stable stable trend 6.2 (-20.4, 41.6)
Kingfisher County 6,10 41.8 (24.7, 66.4) 4
*
*
Delaware County 6,10 41.2 (31.4, 53.5) 13 falling falling trend -24.1 (-39.2, -5.2)
Rogers County 6,10 40.9 (33.3, 49.9) 21 stable stable trend -10.1 (-33.7, 22.0)
Logan County 6,10 40.6 (29.9, 54.0) 10 rising rising trend 34.3 (3.5, 74.3)
Muskogee County 6,10 39.6 (31.7, 49.0) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-24.5, 30.3)
Stephens County 6,10 39.1 (29.6, 50.9) 12 stable stable trend -23.3 (-48.6, 14.4)
Mayes County 6,10 39.0 (29.0, 51.6) 10 stable stable trend -7.5 (-27.7, 18.3)
Tulsa County 6,10 38.5 (35.6, 41.6) 138 stable stable trend -1.3 (-17.0, 17.3)
Ottawa County 6,10 38.5 (27.3, 52.9) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-24.0, 24.6)
Haskell County 6,10 37.9 (21.5, 63.0) 3
*
*
Woodward County 6,10 37.9 (23.5, 58.2) 4 stable stable trend -17.5 (-63.7, 87.5)
Okmulgee County 6,10 37.8 (27.8, 50.5) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-22.0, 34.3)
Garfield County 6,10 37.7 (29.5, 47.5) 15 stable stable trend 3.1 (-19.5, 32.1)
Adair County 6,10 37.6 (23.7, 56.9) 5 stable stable trend 8.0 (-32.0, 71.5)
McCurtain County 6,10 37.4 (26.6, 51.3) 8 stable stable trend -7.8 (-29.3, 20.3)
Marshall County 6,10 36.9 (22.1, 58.8) 4 stable stable trend -20.0 (-55.1, 42.3)
Murray County 6,10 36.8 (21.4, 60.3) 4 stable stable trend -21.8 (-58.7, 48.0)
Sequoyah County 6,10 36.8 (26.9, 49.2) 10 stable stable trend -13.6 (-41.4, 27.3)
Pottawatomie County 6,10 36.6 (28.9, 45.8) 16 stable stable trend 5.8 (-18.1, 36.7)
McClain County 6,10 36.5 (25.6, 50.7) 8 stable stable trend 5.3 (-22.3, 42.6)
Oklahoma County 6,10 35.7 (33.1, 38.5) 147 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.6, 3.6)
Washita County 6,10 35.7 (20.2, 60.3) 3
*
*
Cleveland County 6,10 35.7 (31.1, 40.7) 45 stable stable trend -5.1 (-18.3, 10.4)
Pittsburg County 6,10 35.2 (26.5, 46.1) 12 stable stable trend -3.3 (-19.9, 16.7)
Wagoner County 6,10 34.7 (26.9, 44.0) 14 stable stable trend -6.0 (-29.4, 25.2)
Beckham County 6,10 34.3 (21.6, 52.2) 5 stable stable trend 3.5 (-35.8, 66.7)
Carter County 6,10 33.5 (25.1, 44.0) 11 stable stable trend -8.9 (-27.8, 15.0)
Kay County 6,10 33.3 (24.5, 44.5) 10 stable stable trend 12.9 (-14.3, 48.5)
Bryan County 6,10 32.8 (23.9, 44.2) 9 stable stable trend -10.4 (-40.3, 34.3)
Cherokee County 6,10 31.9 (22.9, 43.4) 9 stable stable trend 4.4 (-5.9, 15.7)
Le Flore County 6,10 31.8 (23.5, 42.3) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-32.5, 46.3)
Seminole County 6,10 29.3 (18.9, 43.8) 5 stable stable trend -10.4 (-44.4, 44.6)
Osage County 6,10 28.0 (20.2, 38.2) 9 stable stable trend 3.9 (-23.8, 41.7)
Grady County 6,10 28.0 (20.4, 37.6) 9 stable stable trend -7.8 (-25.8, 14.4)
Lincoln County 6,10 26.9 (17.9, 39.1) 6 stable stable trend 12.6 (-25.6, 70.2)
Pawnee County 6,10 26.8 (15.2, 44.9) 3
*
*
Alfalfa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hughes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/23/2016 5:04 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top