Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 70.8 (69.7, 72.0) 3,064 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 61.2 (61.1, 61.3) 215,604 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Adair County 6,10 *** 66.1 (52.3, 82.5) 16 stable stable trend -11.2 (-34.6, 20.7)
Alfalfa County 6,10 *** 70.7 (47.7, 103.0) 6 stable stable trend -4.6 (-43.1, 59.7)
Atoka County 6,10 *** 84.5 (66.5, 106.3) 15 stable stable trend 7.5 (-7.9, 25.4)
Beaver County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beckham County 6,10 *** 58.5 (45.5, 74.1) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-29.1, 38.7)
Blaine County 6,10 *** 67.0 (48.6, 90.7) 9 stable stable trend -3.3 (-24.4, 23.7)
Bryan County 6,10 *** 80.0 (69.7, 91.4) 45 stable stable trend -3.9 (-31.9, 35.6)
Caddo County 6,10 *** 83.0 (70.0, 97.8) 30 stable stable trend -5.0 (-28.0, 25.4)
Canadian County 6,10 *** 72.2 (65.4, 79.6) 85 stable stable trend -3.0 (-10.6, 5.4)
Carter County 6,10 *** 77.3 (67.5, 88.2) 46 stable stable trend -2.2 (-12.4, 9.2)
Cherokee County 6,10 *** 78.7 (68.3, 90.3) 42 stable stable trend -4.5 (-17.6, 10.7)
Choctaw County 6,10 *** 77.1 (61.3, 96.3) 17 stable stable trend -12.9 (-33.0, 13.2)
Cimarron County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County 6,10 *** 64.8 (60.2, 69.5) 159 stable stable trend -3.4 (-15.0, 9.8)
Coal County 6,10 *** 75.5 (52.2, 107.5) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-16.6, 23.9)
Comanche County 6,10 *** 74.1 (67.0, 81.6) 83 stable stable trend 6.4 (-8.3, 23.5)
Cotton County 6,10 *** 67.3 (45.0, 98.3) 6 stable stable trend 13.0 (-11.5, 44.3)
Craig County 6,10 *** 81.2 (64.8, 101.1) 17 stable stable trend -9.4 (-33.2, 22.7)
Creek County 6,10 *** 89.1 (80.5, 98.4) 82 stable stable trend -2.5 (-13.2, 9.7)
Custer County 6,10 *** 68.1 (55.2, 83.0) 20 stable stable trend -3.4 (-22.5, 20.4)
Delaware County 6,10 *** 70.9 (61.9, 81.0) 47 stable stable trend -4.1 (-22.3, 18.2)
Dewey County 6,10 *** 46.1 (26.7, 76.4) 3
*
*
Ellis County 6,10 *** 58.8 (34.3, 96.8) 4 stable stable trend 11.6 (-35.6, 93.4)
Garfield County 6,10 *** 62.2 (54.3, 70.9) 46 stable stable trend 5.8 (-0.2, 12.1)
Garvin County 6,10 *** 80.0 (67.3, 94.5) 29 stable stable trend 6.5 (-19.7, 41.1)
Grady County 6,10 *** 66.9 (58.0, 76.9) 42 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.2, 8.0)
Grant County 6,10 *** 57.4 (34.0, 92.9) 4 stable stable trend -15.4 (-47.4, 35.9)
Greer County 6,10 *** 92.6 (64.9, 129.1) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-25.4, 32.3)
Harmon County 6,10 *** 79.6 (44.9, 133.4) 3
*
*
Harper County 6,10 *** 64.0 (36.3, 106.7) 3
*
*
Haskell County 6,10 *** 70.2 (53.6, 90.7) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-12.4, 9.7)
Hughes County 6,10 *** 99.7 (80.7, 122.4) 19 stable stable trend 1.7 (-11.4, 16.8)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 64.7 (52.2, 79.4) 19 stable stable trend -3.0 (-16.5, 12.8)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 79.7 (55.0, 112.7) 7 stable stable trend -12.0 (-38.7, 26.3)
Johnston County 6,10 *** 59.3 (42.9, 80.5) 9 stable stable trend -4.8 (-28.1, 26.0)
Kay County 6,10 *** 72.9 (63.6, 83.2) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-20.6, 24.1)
Kingfisher County 6,10 *** 62.8 (47.4, 81.8) 11 stable stable trend -4.6 (-24.9, 21.2)
Kiowa County 6,10 *** 87.6 (66.6, 114.1) 12 stable stable trend 8.2 (-12.5, 33.7)
Latimer County 6,10 *** 60.7 (44.1, 82.0) 9 stable stable trend 15.0 (-15.9, 57.2)
Le Flore County 6,10 *** 61.7 (53.2, 71.2) 39 stable stable trend -6.9 (-26.0, 17.3)
Lincoln County 6,10 *** 71.3 (60.6, 83.5) 32 stable stable trend 2.5 (-19.5, 30.4)
Logan County 6,10 *** 72.6 (62.2, 84.3) 36 rising rising trend 10.8 (0.8, 21.8)
Love County 6,10 *** 56.2 (39.4, 78.6) 7 stable stable trend -5.1 (-24.2, 18.8)
Major County 6,10 *** 67.2 (46.8, 94.4) 7 stable stable trend 5.8 (-31.3, 63.0)
Marshall County 6,10 *** 69.0 (55.2, 86.0) 17 stable stable trend -12.0 (-24.1, 1.9)
Mayes County 6,10 *** 81.3 (70.7, 93.2) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-9.2, 8.4)
McClain County 6,10 *** 81.7 (69.4, 95.5) 33 stable stable trend -6.9 (-21.0, 9.8)
McCurtain County 6,10 *** 88.4 (76.0, 102.4) 38 stable stable trend 4.6 (-27.9, 51.9)
McIntosh County 6,10 *** 75.9 (63.3, 90.9) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-14.2, 18.0)
Murray County 6,10 *** 91.3 (73.1, 113.2) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-13.7, 14.3)
Muskogee County 6,10 *** 96.3 (87.2, 106.2) 83 stable stable trend 3.1 (-14.6, 24.4)
Noble County 6,10 *** 59.6 (43.5, 80.2) 9 stable stable trend -14.8 (-37.6, 16.4)
Nowata County 6,10 *** 69.0 (51.4, 91.4) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-27.5, 43.9)
Okfuskee County 6,10 *** 70.8 (53.4, 92.6) 11 stable stable trend 6.5 (-36.8, 79.7)
Oklahoma County 6,10 *** 69.3 (66.6, 72.1) 520 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.7)
Okmulgee County 6,10 *** 94.2 (82.5, 107.1) 48 falling falling trend -9.2 (-17.2, -0.5)
Osage County 6,10 *** 57.9 (49.8, 67.0) 39 stable stable trend 1.6 (-15.7, 22.5)
Ottawa County 6,10 *** 79.1 (67.5, 92.3) 34 stable stable trend 4.8 (-5.3, 16.1)
Pawnee County 6,10 *** 69.5 (54.7, 87.3) 16 stable stable trend 5.7 (-43.0, 95.9)
Payne County 6,10 *** 61.9 (53.7, 70.9) 42 stable stable trend 5.8 (-6.6, 19.9)
Pittsburg County 6,10 *** 79.3 (69.6, 90.1) 49 stable stable trend 3.1 (-7.2, 14.6)
Pontotoc County 6,10 *** 69.5 (59.0, 81.3) 32 stable stable trend 2.6 (-12.7, 20.5)
Pottawatomie County 6,10 *** 82.8 (74.3, 92.1) 70 stable stable trend -1.9 (-15.3, 13.8)
Pushmataha County 6,10 *** 60.4 (45.0, 80.3) 11 stable stable trend -10.9 (-31.5, 15.9)
Roger Mills County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rogers County 6,10 *** 63.0 (56.3, 70.2) 66 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.1, 5.5)
Seminole County 6,10 *** 83.4 (70.1, 98.7) 28 stable stable trend -3.3 (-12.1, 6.4)
Sequoyah County 6,10 *** 66.6 (57.0, 77.5) 35 stable stable trend 4.9 (-35.0, 69.4)
Stephens County 6,10 *** 72.0 (62.7, 82.5) 44 rising rising trend 6.8 (0.2, 13.7)
Texas County 6,10 *** 49.1 (35.9, 65.5) 9 stable stable trend -12.8 (-42.3, 31.9)
Tillman County 6,10 *** 60.6 (41.6, 86.3) 7 stable stable trend 12.8 (-14.9, 49.5)
Tulsa County 6,10 *** 66.9 (64.1, 69.9) 429 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Wagoner County 6,10 *** 68.8 (60.8, 77.5) 57 stable stable trend 5.9 (-10.3, 25.0)
Washington County 6,10 *** 77.7 (68.8, 87.6) 56 stable stable trend -3.3 (-18.9, 15.3)
Washita County 6,10 *** 48.5 (33.8, 67.8) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-21.5, 23.5)
Woods County 6,10 *** 53.0 (35.4, 77.0) 6 stable stable trend -7.9 (-41.5, 45.1)
Woodward County 6,10 *** 39.2 (28.7, 52.4) 9 stable stable trend 21.4 (-14.2, 71.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/16/2017 11:51 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top