Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Leukemia, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 6,10 *** 13.9 (13.4, 14.5) 585 stable stable trend -0.0 (-7.3, 7.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 13.6 (13.6, 13.7) 47,270 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Noble County 6,10 *** 23.8 (13.3, 39.6) 3
*
*
Hughes County 6,10 *** 23.0 (14.1, 36.0) 4
*
*
Pontotoc County 6,10 *** 19.1 (13.7, 26.0) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-29.8, 50.3)
Pawnee County 6,10 *** 17.9 (10.7, 28.7) 4 stable stable trend -6.3 (-37.4, 40.3)
Marshall County 6,10 *** 17.9 (10.5, 28.8) 4 rising rising trend 36.3 (6.4, 74.7)
Muskogee County 6,10 *** 17.4 (13.6, 22.0) 15 stable stable trend 16.9 (-12.4, 55.9)
Canadian County 6,10 *** 16.5 (13.4, 20.1) 20 falling falling trend -24.4 (-40.2, -4.3)
Garvin County 6,10 *** 16.4 (10.5, 24.4) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-51.7, 98.8)
Tulsa County 6,10 *** 15.8 (14.5, 17.3) 103 stable stable trend -3.2 (-15.0, 10.3)
Wagoner County 6,10 *** 15.7 (12.0, 20.4) 12 stable stable trend -3.4 (-31.5, 36.2)
Okmulgee County 6,10 *** 15.7 (11.0, 21.9) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-31.7, 49.1)
Cherokee County 6,10 *** 15.5 (11.0, 21.1) 8 stable stable trend -6.8 (-31.6, 27.2)
Oklahoma County 6,10 *** 15.4 (14.2, 16.7) 118 stable stable trend -3.3 (-16.0, 11.4)
McClain County 6,10 *** 15.3 (10.1, 22.2) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-28.2, 49.0)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 15.2 (9.2, 23.7) 4 stable stable trend 5.8 (-36.4, 76.0)
McCurtain County 6,10 *** 15.1 (9.9, 22.1) 6 stable stable trend 17.1 (-22.7, 77.4)
Grady County 6,10 *** 15.1 (10.9, 20.3) 9 stable stable trend -5.3 (-28.4, 25.2)
Garfield County 6,10 *** 15.0 (11.2, 19.8) 11 stable stable trend 12.9 (-15.3, 50.4)
Adair County 6,10 *** 14.4 (8.1, 23.6) 3
*
*
Beckham County 6,10 *** 13.8 (7.8, 22.4) 3
*
*
Cleveland County 6,10 *** 13.8 (11.7, 16.0) 34 stable stable trend 2.8 (-22.6, 36.5)
Rogers County 6,10 *** 13.4 (10.3, 17.2) 13 stable stable trend 15.1 (-25.8, 78.4)
Delaware County 6,10 *** 13.3 (9.1, 18.9) 7 stable stable trend 7.1 (-39.4, 89.0)
Washington County 6,10 *** 13.3 (9.5, 18.0) 9 stable stable trend -14.6 (-56.6, 68.0)
Comanche County 6,10 *** 13.1 (10.3, 16.4) 15 stable stable trend 4.7 (-29.6, 55.9)
Custer County 6,10 *** 12.4 (7.3, 19.6) 4 stable stable trend -9.4 (-49.0, 60.7)
Lincoln County 6,10 *** 12.1 (7.7, 18.4) 5 falling falling trend -12.9 (-22.9, -1.7)
McIntosh County 6,10 *** 12.1 (6.7, 20.4) 4 stable stable trend 11.7 (-16.2, 49.0)
Kay County 6,10 *** 11.6 (8.0, 16.4) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-36.3, 58.8)
Carter County 6,10 *** 11.5 (7.9, 16.3) 7 stable stable trend -13.6 (-40.4, 25.4)
Pottawatomie County 6,10 *** 11.3 (8.2, 15.3) 9 stable stable trend -11.5 (-24.5, 3.8)
Ottawa County 6,10 *** 11.2 (7.0, 17.2) 5 stable stable trend 21.1 (-11.3, 65.4)
Le Flore County 6,10 *** 11.1 (7.5, 15.7) 7 stable stable trend -5.8 (-18.7, 9.1)
Pittsburg County 6,10 *** 11.0 (7.4, 15.8) 6 stable stable trend 31.5 (-30.0, 147.1)
Creek County 6,10 *** 10.9 (8.0, 14.7) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-25.0, 40.7)
Seminole County 6,10 *** 10.7 (6.3, 17.3) 4 stable stable trend 9.0 (-14.9, 39.7)
Payne County 6,10 *** 10.7 (7.5, 14.9) 7 stable stable trend -7.1 (-14.1, 0.5)
Osage County 6,10 *** 10.7 (7.1, 15.5) 6 stable stable trend 22.9 (-39.9, 151.6)
Stephens County 6,10 *** 10.5 (7.1, 15.2) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-41.2, 78.4)
Caddo County 6,10 *** 10.1 (5.8, 16.5) 3
*
*
Sequoyah County 6,10 *** 10.1 (6.5, 15.2) 5 stable stable trend 16.1 (-16.9, 62.1)
Bryan County 6,10 *** 9.7 (6.2, 14.4) 5 stable stable trend 12.8 (-34.7, 94.9)
Logan County 6,10 *** 9.0 (5.7, 13.6) 5 stable stable trend 12.5 (-48.6, 146.5)
Mayes County 6,10 *** 8.2 (4.8, 13.0) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-28.9, 49.9)
Alfalfa County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Atoka County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beaver County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cotton County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Craig County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ellis County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnston County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kingfisher County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Latimer County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Love County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Major County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nowata County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Okfuskee County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pushmataha County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Texas County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tillman County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washita County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woods County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodward County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/22/2019 2:38 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top