Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon 6 N/A 1,876.5 (1,862.2, 1,890.9) N/A 13,678 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 1,975.2 (1,973.5, 1,977.0) N/A 1,010,129 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Baker County 6 Rural 1,320.5 (1,168.9, 1,486.3) 34 (29, 36) 56 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.7)
Clatsop County 6 Rural 2,132.3 (1,994.6, 2,277.1) 1 (1, 13) 191 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Coos County 6 Rural 1,806.8 (1,715.7, 1,901.5) 20 (10, 27) 302 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Curry County 6 Rural 1,622.6 (1,497.4, 1,755.6) 29 (18, 33) 128 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Douglas County 6 Rural 1,663.8 (1,596.2, 1,733.5) 27 (20, 30) 463 falling falling trend -8.3 (-15.8, -1.1)
Gilliam County 6 Rural 1,177.9 (795.0, 1,678.2) 36 (18, 36) 6 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.5, -2.3)
Grant County 6 Rural 1,631.8 (1,400.0, 1,891.1) 28 (7, 35) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Harney County 6 Rural 1,447.9 (1,211.7, 1,716.9) 33 (19, 36) 27 stable stable trend 11.2 (-2.9, 20.9)
Hood River County 6 Rural 1,910.8 (1,716.9, 2,120.8) 14 (1, 28) 74 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Klamath County 6 Rural 1,949.6 (1,846.1, 2,057.3) 10 (3, 21) 278 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Lake County 6 Rural 1,825.9 (1,571.1, 2,110.8) 18 (1, 33) 38 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 1,755.7 (1,656.1, 1,859.9) 21 (13, 29) 249 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Malheur County 6 Rural 1,510.6 (1,363.3, 1,669.6) 31 (23, 35) 78 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.1)
Morrow County 6 Rural 1,708.3 (1,449.7, 2,000.0) 25 (2, 35) 32 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.5)
Sherman County 6 Rural 1,234.9 (824.4, 1,778.0) 35 (11, 36) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.6, 5.7)
Tillamook County 6 Rural 1,715.4 (1,576.9, 1,863.0) 24 (12, 31) 119 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.2)
Umatilla County 6 Rural 1,723.3 (1,620.0, 1,831.5) 23 (14, 30) 213 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Union County 6 Rural 1,809.2 (1,648.3, 1,981.6) 19 (4, 29) 95 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Wallowa County 6 Rural 1,699.2 (1,451.3, 1,977.5) 26 (3, 34) 35 stable stable trend 2.0 (-3.0, 11.3)
Wasco County 6 Rural 1,923.4 (1,757.8, 2,100.3) 13 (1, 26) 102 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Wheeler County 6 Rural 1,746.6 (1,267.2, 2,348.7) 22 (1, 36) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 3.0)
Benton County 6 Urban 1,527.0 (1,438.4, 1,619.6) 30 (25, 34) 232 falling falling trend -2.8 (-7.4, -2.0)
Clackamas County 6 Urban 1,949.9 (1,904.5, 1,996.1) 9 (6, 17) 1,454 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Columbia County 6 Urban 2,101.5 (1,971.2, 2,238.2) 2 (1, 14) 203 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Crook County 6 Urban 2,055.8 (1,889.9, 2,232.5) 5 (1, 20) 119 stable stable trend -6.5 (-13.9, 0.7)
Deschutes County 6 Urban 1,925.1 (1,860.9, 1,990.9) 12 (6, 19) 719 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Jackson County 6 Urban 1,980.5 (1,923.8, 2,038.5) 7 (4, 15) 947 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 1,838.8 (1,663.3, 2,028.1) 17 (3, 29) 84 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.4, 0.1)
Josephine County 6 Urban 2,076.6 (1,992.9, 2,162.9) 4 (1, 11) 471 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Lane County 6 Urban 1,454.9 (1,415.2, 1,495.4) 32 (29, 35) 1,056 falling falling trend -14.6 (-20.1, -9.5)
Linn County 6 Urban 1,872.1 (1,793.3, 1,953.6) 15 (7, 23) 436 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Marion County 6 Urban 2,031.4 (1,976.6, 2,087.2) 6 (2, 12) 1,072 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.6, -0.8)
Multnomah County 6 Urban 2,094.2 (2,054.2, 2,134.8) 3 (1, 7) 2,224 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Polk County 6 Urban 1,926.2 (1,828.3, 2,027.9) 11 (4, 22) 295 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Washington County 6 Urban 1,852.4 (1,809.0, 1,896.5) 16 (12, 22) 1,446 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.2)
Yamhill County 6 Urban 1,975.8 (1,884.4, 2,070.5) 8 (2, 18) 360 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.9, -0.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 1:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top