Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County
All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50
Sorted by Recentaapc
Explanation of Column HeadersObjective - The objective of *** is from the Healthy People 2020 project done by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.
Other Notes
- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Oregon6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 100.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.5 to 102.0 and 2,553 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 0.4.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- Rate : The incidence rate is 106.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 106.3 to 106.7 and 208,914 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to -0.2.
Jefferson County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 107.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 83.4 to 135.8 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 9 (1, 31)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 5.8.
Crook County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 127.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 100.2 to 159.8 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 1 (1, 24)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 5.3.
Clatsop County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 110.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 91.4 to 132.5 and 24 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 5 (1, 27)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.6 to 3.7.
Wallowa County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 105.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 60.0 to 171.0 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 11 (1, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.0 to 4.5.
Klamath County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 109.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 94.7 to 126.2 and 39 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 8 (1, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.3 to 2.5.
Clackamas County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 115.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 109.3 to 121.3 and 290 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 2 (1, 11)
- Recent Trend : The trend is rising
because the trend is 0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 0.1 to 1.7.
Polk County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 111.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 98.0 to 125.7 and 52 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 6 (1, 23)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.8 to 2.3.
Washington County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 96.6 to 105.5 and 407 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 14 (7, 23)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.1 to 1.3.
Union County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 110.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 86.8 to 138.9 and 15 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 7 (1, 30)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 3.4.
Yamhill County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 98.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 88.2 to 110.4 and 63 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 18 (4, 28)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.5 to 1.3.
Douglas County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 112.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 100.1 to 125.7 and 62 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 4 (1, 21)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.1 to 1.6.
Josephine County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 100.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 87.8 to 115.2 and 44 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 15 (2, 28)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.4 to 2.1.
Tillamook County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 104.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 81.5 to 132.9 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 10 (1, 31)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.3 to 3.1.
Multnomah County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 103.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 99.4 to 106.9 and 602 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 12 (6, 20)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.2 to 0.6.
Umatilla County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 94.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 82.0 to 107.6 and 44 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 19 (5, 30)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.2 to 1.6.
Benton County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 89.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 77.6 to 102.9 and 42 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 27 (8, 31)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.6 to 1.9.
Harney County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 86.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 49.3 to 140.0 and 3 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 28 (1, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to 4.9.
Marion County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 99.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.4 to 105.8 and 203 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 17 (7, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is 0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 1.0.
Columbia County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 92.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 77.4 to 108.8 and 28 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 24 (4, 31)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.3 to 0.8.
Coos County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 94.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 80.0 to 111.1 and 30 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 21 (4, 31)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 1.5.
Curry County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 65.9 to 122.4 and 9 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 26 (1, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.6 to 3.0.
Hood River County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 114.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 90.7 to 141.6 and 16 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 3 (1, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to 2.0.
Jackson County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 100.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 92.2 to 108.5 and 120 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 16 (6, 26)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 0.3.
Deschutes County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 101.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 93.5 to 110.4 and 116 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 13 (4, 25)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.9 to 0.5.
Malheur County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 77.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 59.7 to 97.6 and 14 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 31 (11, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.7 to 2.5.
Lincoln County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 92.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 75.6 to 111.3 and 22 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 22 (3, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.0 to 0.2.
Baker County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 67.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 44.4 to 98.4 and 5 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 32 (9, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.3 to 2.3.
Lane County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 78.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 72.7 to 83.5 and 165 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 30 (24, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling
because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to -1.0.
Linn County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 93.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 84.2 to 104.5 and 68 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 20 (7, 29)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.9 to 0.0.
Lake County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 82.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 48.7 to 130.8 and 4 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 29 (1, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.6 to 2.7.
Wasco County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 69.6 to 115.4 and 13 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 25 (2, 32)
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable
because the trend is -2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.5 to 0.1.
Morrow County6
- Rate : The incidence rate is 90.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 60.6 to 130.0 and 6 average annual cases over 2015-2019.
- CI*Rank⋔ : 23 (1, 32)
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- Rate : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
- CI*Rank⋔ : *
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/05/2023 4:25 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Gilliam, Grant, Sherman, Wheeler
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.