Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oregon by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon 6,10 *** 27.0 (26.4, 27.8) 1,211 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.2, 5.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 20.7 (20.6, 20.8) 71,035 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.0, 2.6)
Deschutes County 6,10 *** 39.9 (35.9, 44.2) 78 stable stable trend 1.2 (-10.1, 13.9)
Grant County 6,10 *** 37.5 (20.2, 64.2) 3
*
*
Benton County 6,10 *** 36.0 (30.4, 42.4) 32 stable stable trend 0.3 (-16.3, 20.1)
Polk County 6,10 *** 34.8 (29.2, 41.3) 29 stable stable trend -8.8 (-21.5, 5.9)
Clackamas County 6,10 *** 34.7 (32.3, 37.4) 157 rising rising trend 9.2 (2.2, 16.5)
Tillamook County 6,10 *** 31.3 (23.4, 41.3) 12 stable stable trend -14.0 (-40.0, 23.2)
Washington County 6,10 *** 31.2 (29.1, 33.5) 170 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.8, 4.1)
Klamath County 6,10 *** 30.1 (24.8, 36.2) 25 rising rising trend 18.2 (2.9, 35.7)
Multnomah County 6,10 *** 28.1 (26.5, 29.9) 219 stable stable trend -0.5 (-7.3, 6.9)
Columbia County 6,10 *** 27.3 (21.4, 34.2) 16 stable stable trend -3.5 (-19.7, 15.9)
Douglas County 6,10 *** 26.9 (23.0, 31.4) 39 stable stable trend -4.2 (-17.7, 11.6)
Marion County 6,10 *** 26.2 (23.8, 28.8) 90 stable stable trend -6.8 (-18.8, 6.9)
Baker County 6,10 *** 25.5 (15.9, 39.1) 6 stable stable trend -22.3 (-52.1, 26.0)
Hood River County 6,10 *** 24.6 (16.7, 35.1) 6 stable stable trend 17.4 (-34.9, 111.9)
Lincoln County 6,10 *** 24.5 (19.1, 31.2) 17 stable stable trend -15.7 (-32.6, 5.3)
Clatsop County 6,10 *** 24.3 (18.1, 32.0) 12 stable stable trend 5.8 (-16.9, 34.6)
Crook County 6,10 *** 23.5 (15.7, 34.1) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-45.9, 86.7)
Yamhill County 6,10 *** 22.8 (18.9, 27.2) 25 stable stable trend 2.5 (-13.6, 21.7)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 22.3 (14.5, 32.8) 6 stable stable trend 23.0 (-52.4, 217.9)
Lane County 6,10 *** 20.9 (18.9, 23.0) 90 stable stable trend -4.8 (-23.3, 18.2)
Linn County 6,10 *** 20.9 (17.6, 24.6) 30 stable stable trend -5.3 (-21.7, 14.4)
Wasco County 6,10 *** 20.7 (14.0, 29.7) 7 stable stable trend -19.5 (-37.8, 4.2)
Josephine County 6,10 *** 19.7 (15.8, 24.2) 23 stable stable trend -2.3 (-40.2, 59.5)
Umatilla County 6,10 *** 19.7 (15.5, 24.6) 16 falling falling trend -17.2 (-28.2, -4.6)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 19.4 (17.0, 22.0) 52 stable stable trend 0.8 (-19.3, 25.8)
Coos County 6,10 *** 17.6 (13.7, 22.4) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-32.0, 41.9)
Union County 6,10 *** 15.9 (10.2, 23.7) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-64.3, 169.7)
Malheur County 6,10 *** 15.7 (10.4, 22.9) 6 stable stable trend -12.9 (-45.1, 38.2)
Curry County 6,10 *** 15.4 (10.5, 22.8) 7 stable stable trend 25.0 (-10.2, 74.0)
Gilliam County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harney County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrow County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wallowa County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 6,10 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/20/2017 10:16 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top