Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 *** 104.3 (103.3, 105.3) N/A 8,698 stable stable trend 0.8 (-6.2, 8.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 106.2 (106.0, 106.4) N/A 200,677 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.3)
Philadelphia County 6 *** 138.0 (134.2, 141.9) 1 (1, 5) 1,053 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.6, 5.3)
Allegheny County 6 *** 95.3 (92.2, 98.5) 36 (25, 46) 761 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.0)
Montgomery County 6 *** 116.1 (111.9, 120.4) 11 (4, 20) 606 stable stable trend 1.1 (-7.6, 10.7)
Bucks County 6 *** 121.8 (117.1, 126.6) 6 (2, 15) 536 stable stable trend 3.1 (-2.4, 9.0)
Delaware County 6 *** 120.3 (114.9, 125.8) 7 (2, 17) 401 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.9)
Chester County 6 *** 101.8 (96.8, 106.9) 25 (16, 39) 333 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.2, -3.2)
Lancaster County 6 *** 93.1 (88.5, 97.9) 41 (25, 50) 315 stable stable trend 7.1 (-3.0, 18.3)
Berks County 6 *** 117.2 (111.2, 123.4) 10 (3, 21) 303 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.4)
Westmoreland County 6 *** 94.8 (89.7, 100.2) 39 (23, 49) 265 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.0, -2.7)
Luzerne County 6 *** 117.2 (110.8, 124.0) 9 (3, 21) 255 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Lehigh County 6 *** 114.0 (107.6, 120.6) 13 (4, 25) 250 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.2, -2.3)
Northampton County 6 *** 121.9 (115.0, 129.0) 5 (2, 17) 246 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.1, -2.9)
York County 6 *** 85.5 (80.7, 90.6) 50 (37, 57) 244 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.6, -3.9)
Erie County 6 *** 105.8 (99.0, 113.0) 21 (11, 37) 189 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.2)
Dauphin County 6 *** 92.4 (85.8, 99.4) 42 (22, 54) 154 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -0.9)
Washington County 6 *** 96.1 (89.0, 103.5) 34 (18, 51) 146 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.8)
Butler County 6 *** 111.2 (102.9, 120.0) 16 (4, 32) 141 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.1, -2.7)
Monroe County 6 *** 98.9 (90.7, 107.7) 29 (14, 50) 115 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.2, -3.0)
Cumberland County 6 *** 70.3 (64.5, 76.5) 63 (52, 66) 114 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.1, -3.7)
Beaver County 6 *** 89.7 (82.2, 97.8) 44 (24, 57) 110 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.9, -2.2)
Cambria County 6 *** 107.0 (98.0, 116.7) 20 (6, 42) 109 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.7, -2.8)
Schuylkill County 6 *** 99.7 (91.2, 108.9) 27 (14, 50) 105 stable stable trend 2.2 (-4.0, 8.8)
Lackawanna County 6 *** 72.9 (66.7, 79.6) 60 (50, 65) 105 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.8)
Mercer County 6 *** 124.2 (113.5, 135.7) 4 (1, 21) 104 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.7, -2.4)
Lebanon County 6 *** 95.3 (86.6, 104.8) 37 (16, 54) 90 stable stable trend 7.4 (-3.0, 18.9)
Blair County 6 *** 96.7 (87.5, 106.6) 33 (16, 52) 86 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Centre County 6 *** 97.2 (87.9, 107.3) 31 (15, 53) 84 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.8)
Franklin County 6 *** 72.7 (65.5, 80.6) 61 (49, 66) 76 stable stable trend 13.2 (-3.8, 33.2)
Adams County 6 *** 98.1 (88.1, 109.1) 30 (13, 54) 73 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.7)
Fayette County 6 *** 71.7 (64.3, 79.9) 62 (50, 66) 72 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.0, -4.6)
Lawrence County 6 *** 98.9 (88.3, 110.7) 28 (10, 53) 66 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.1, -2.5)
Somerset County 6 *** 110.6 (98.7, 123.7) 17 (3, 44) 65 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.6, -3.1)
Clearfield County 6 *** 108.8 (97.1, 121.6) 18 (3, 45) 65 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.4)
Lycoming County 6 *** 80.0 (71.2, 89.8) 56 (34, 65) 63 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.1, -3.0)
Crawford County 6 *** 95.3 (84.7, 107.1) 38 (13, 56) 62 falling falling trend -7.4 (-9.6, -5.0)
Northumberland County 6 *** 86.5 (76.9, 97.1) 49 (23, 62) 61 falling falling trend -6.5 (-8.6, -4.3)
Armstrong County 6 *** 113.5 (100.6, 127.8) 14 (2, 39) 59 stable stable trend -4.6 (-12.1, 3.5)
Carbon County 6 *** 97.0 (85.0, 110.5) 32 (10, 56) 50 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.2)
Venango County 6 *** 111.5 (97.2, 127.5) 15 (2, 48) 47 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Columbia County 6 *** 104.5 (91.2, 119.5) 22 (3, 52) 46 stable stable trend 10.7 (-1.3, 24.2)
Bradford County 6 *** 95.8 (83.6, 109.7) 35 (11, 57) 45 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.9)
Indiana County 6 *** 76.5 (66.7, 87.6) 58 (36, 66) 45 falling falling trend -7.4 (-9.4, -5.4)
Jefferson County 6 *** 119.4 (103.2, 137.8) 8 (1, 39) 40 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
Pike County 6 *** 81.3 (70.0, 94.3) 54 (26, 65) 38 stable stable trend 0.5 (-11.9, 14.7)
Tioga County 6 *** 115.1 (99.0, 133.5) 12 (1, 45) 38 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.5)
Bedford County 6 *** 91.5 (78.5, 106.5) 43 (13, 62) 36 falling falling trend -6.9 (-9.0, -4.8)
Elk County 6 *** 134.9 (114.9, 158.0) 3 (1, 25) 34 falling falling trend -6.9 (-11.8, -1.7)
Warren County 6 *** 102.0 (86.8, 119.7) 24 (3, 57) 33 falling falling trend -8.2 (-11.3, -5.0)
Wayne County 6 *** 74.2 (63.1, 87.2) 59 (35, 66) 33 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.1, -1.3)
Susquehanna County 6 *** 88.3 (74.9, 104.1) 45 (15, 63) 32 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.3, -2.9)
Huntingdon County 6 *** 87.7 (74.0, 103.5) 46 (16, 64) 30 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.5)
Union County 6 *** 100.2 (84.3, 118.4) 26 (3, 59) 29 stable stable trend 10.9 (-6.4, 31.5)
Mifflin County 6 *** 83.0 (69.7, 98.5) 52 (20, 66) 28 falling falling trend -5.8 (-10.2, -1.2)
Snyder County 6 *** 87.1 (72.2, 104.5) 47 (16, 65) 25 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.2, -0.9)
McKean County 6 *** 80.0 (65.9, 96.5) 57 (22, 66) 24 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.4)
Perry County 6 *** 65.9 (53.8, 80.3) 64 (45, 67) 23 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.7, -2.0)
Clarion County 6 *** 82.1 (67.2, 99.7) 53 (18, 66) 22 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.3, -4.2)
Clinton County 6 *** 80.1 (65.2, 97.7) 55 (21, 67) 21 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.5, -1.9)
Wyoming County 6 *** 94.1 (76.1, 115.7) 40 (4, 64) 20 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.8, -3.2)
Greene County 6 *** 60.3 (47.1, 76.3) 65 (49, 67) 15 falling falling trend -6.9 (-9.3, -4.4)
Montour County 6 *** 108.5 (84.1, 138.7) 19 (1, 63) 14 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.4, 0.1)
Potter County 6 *** 86.9 (66.5, 113.2) 48 (4, 67) 13 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.4, -0.8)
Fulton County 6 *** 85.1 (62.9, 114.1) 51 (4, 67) 10 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.4, 0.7)
Juniata County 6 *** 56.1 (41.3, 75.0) 66 (49, 67) 10 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.6, -1.9)
Sullivan County 6 *** 138.0 (96.4, 197.7) 2 (1, 60) 8 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.1)
Cameron County 6 *** 104.5 (65.6, 166.2) 23 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.1, 1.9)
Forest County 6 *** 55.0 (32.3, 95.5) 67 (22, 67) 4 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.7, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/25/2021 8:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top