Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 113.3 (112.3, 114.4) N/A 8,401 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Montour County 6 150.6 (118.1, 189.1) 1 (1, 60) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.8)
Elk County 6 139.9 (115.1, 168.4) 2 (1, 60) 23 stable stable trend -1.9 (-16.9, 3.2)
Venango County 6 136.2 (117.1, 157.5) 3 (1, 53) 37 stable stable trend 0.4 (-12.0, 2.3)
Greene County 6 133.0 (112.0, 156.9) 4 (1, 59) 29 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.0)
Pike County 6 132.7 (114.6, 152.9) 5 (1, 57) 39 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.8)
Wyoming County 6 131.7 (106.7, 160.7) 7 (1, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5)
McKean County 6 131.2 (111.2, 153.8) 6 (1, 61) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Bedford County 6 129.7 (110.7, 150.9) 10 (1, 61) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-11.7, 4.3)
Northampton County 6 129.6 (122.1, 137.4) 9 (2, 32) 227 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.7)
Lackawanna County 6 129.3 (120.2, 138.8) 8 (2, 37) 153 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.4)
Somerset County 6 128.4 (113.4, 144.8) 11 (1, 56) 54 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Mifflin County 6 127.6 (108.4, 149.2) 12 (1, 63) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.8)
Bradford County 6 127.4 (110.3, 146.2) 14 (1, 60) 41 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.1, 3.7)
Susquehanna County 6 127.1 (106.2, 151.0) 16 (1, 63) 27 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 4.1)
Potter County 6 127.1 (94.7, 166.7) 17 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 3.7)
Washington County 6 126.9 (117.8, 136.4) 13 (3, 43) 148 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 2.0)
Beaver County 6 126.8 (116.5, 137.7) 15 (2, 48) 114 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 2.9)
Lycoming County 6 125.9 (113.8, 138.9) 18 (2, 52) 80 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.9, 0.5)
Luzerne County 6 125.7 (118.5, 133.2) 19 (4, 39) 230 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Blair County 6 125.5 (113.8, 137.9) 20 (2, 55) 86 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Sullivan County 6 125.0 (73.1, 201.3) 22 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend 2.9 (-3.5, 9.5)
Armstrong County 6 124.6 (108.7, 142.2) 21 (1, 61) 45 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 3.8)
Lawrence County 6 124.4 (110.3, 139.7) 23 (2, 58) 58 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Warren County 6 123.7 (102.9, 147.4) 24 (1, 64) 25 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 3.9)
Butler County 6 120.4 (111.3, 130.1) 26 (5, 55) 131 stable stable trend -0.2 (-6.7, 1.3)
Columbia County 6 119.9 (104.1, 137.4) 28 (2, 64) 43 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.8)
Crawford County 6 119.8 (106.0, 134.9) 27 (3, 61) 56 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.1)
Juniata County 6 118.6 (94.2, 147.4) 30 (1, 66) 16 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 5.9)
Allegheny County 6 118.4 (114.8, 122.1) 29 (18, 42) 830 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 0.2)
Fayette County 6 117.8 (107.0, 129.4) 31 (6, 60) 88 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.1)
Northumberland County 6 116.7 (103.8, 130.7) 36 (5, 63) 60 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Cambria County 6 116.4 (105.3, 128.3) 34 (6, 62) 82 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Erie County 6 116.4 (108.8, 124.3) 32 (12, 57) 180 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Monroe County 6 116.2 (106.6, 126.5) 35 (9, 60) 110 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Carbon County 6 115.8 (100.6, 132.6) 33 (3, 64) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Jefferson County 6 115.7 (97.0, 136.9) 37 (2, 66) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.0)
Lehigh County 6 114.9 (108.6, 121.4) 38 (18, 56) 252 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Lancaster County 6 114.6 (109.3, 120.2) 39 (19, 55) 351 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Berks County 6 113.6 (107.7, 119.8) 40 (20, 58) 276 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.2, 0.9)
Perry County 6 113.0 (95.6, 132.7) 43 (3, 66) 30 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.2)
Indiana County 6 112.8 (98.9, 128.1) 41 (6, 65) 49 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.1)
Westmoreland County 6 112.7 (106.0, 119.7) 42 (19, 59) 216 falling falling trend -4.1 (-8.3, -1.2)
Delaware County 6 112.3 (107.2, 117.5) 44 (23, 58) 370 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
York County 6 112.2 (106.5, 118.0) 46 (23, 58) 298 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Bucks County 6 111.9 (107.0, 116.9) 45 (24, 57) 407 falling falling trend -3.8 (-8.3, -0.1)
Schuylkill County 6 111.6 (101.6, 122.3) 47 (12, 63) 93 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Dauphin County 6 111.4 (104.2, 119.0) 48 (18, 61) 182 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Chester County 6 110.8 (105.6, 116.2) 50 (26, 58) 346 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Mercer County 6 110.6 (98.9, 123.3) 51 (11, 65) 66 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Montgomery County 6 110.4 (106.3, 114.6) 49 (28, 58) 548 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.5, 0.2)
Snyder County 6 109.3 (90.6, 130.7) 52 (3, 66) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.3)
Cumberland County 6 106.8 (99.5, 114.5) 54 (27, 64) 160 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.1, 0.2)
Clinton County 6 106.5 (87.1, 128.8) 53 (4, 66) 21 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.2)
Franklin County 6 105.9 (96.5, 116.0) 55 (22, 65) 94 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.0, 0.2)
Tioga County 6 105.6 (86.9, 127.1) 56 (5, 66) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.6)
Lebanon County 6 103.8 (94.0, 114.4) 57 (23, 66) 83 falling falling trend -6.7 (-13.6, -0.2)
Adams County 6 103.6 (91.8, 116.4) 58 (21, 66) 58 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Clarion County 6 103.3 (84.3, 125.2) 60 (7, 66) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.2)
Clearfield County 6 102.7 (90.1, 116.6) 59 (17, 66) 49 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Huntingdon County 6 102.1 (85.3, 121.1) 61 (10, 66) 27 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.3)
Philadelphia County 6 100.8 (97.9, 103.7) 62 (52, 65) 976 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.3, -1.2)
Centre County 6 98.1 (88.8, 108.0) 63 (43, 66) 87 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Union County 6 97.3 (81.4, 115.5) 64 (16, 66) 27 falling falling trend -12.5 (-22.3, -1.0)
Forest County 6 94.9 (58.3, 169.9) 25 (1, 66) 4 rising rising trend 5.7 (0.1, 13.1)
Fulton County 6 92.3 (65.7, 126.4) 65 (4, 66) 8 falling falling trend -12.9 (-27.6, -0.4)
Wayne County 6 89.8 (74.7, 107.1) 66 (36, 66) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Cameron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/14/2024 7:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cameron

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top